[sage-devel] Re: (cy)PARI in Parallel, Heisenbugs, and Merging Policy

2022-05-14 Thread dwb...@gmail.com
A bit more information: as far as we know there are problems only on Linux: the logs badlog, badlog1, badlog2 and badlog3 are made by one machine (a Xeon box running Ubuntu 18.04) and badlog-match is another machne (an i7 also running Ubuntu 18.04). In all the logs except badlog, there is a seg

[sage-devel] Segmentation Fault

2023-05-29 Thread dwb...@gmail.com
I was shown the following way of getting a segmentation fault in Sage. sage: var("q A") sage: p = A*(1+1/A)-A-1 sage: (q^p).full_simplify() This consistently causes a crash. The person who found it was doing some actual work, got a crash, and boiled it down to a minimal example. Daniel Bump --

[sage-devel] Re: Unable to build develop branch

2021-01-22 Thread dwb...@gmail.com
sday, January 21, 2021 at 8:03:55 PM UTC-8 dwb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> I'm unable to build the develop branch since upgrading my iMac to Big >> Sur. I have python3 and scipy installed through homebrew. In /usr/local/bin >> I have a symbolic link from python to pyth

[sage-devel] Re: Unable to build develop branch

2021-01-22 Thread dwb...@gmail.com
not just use the branch from #31183. The develop > branch has some crucial pieces for building Sage in Big Sur. > > John > > On Friday, January 22, 2021 at 11:30:57 AM UTC-8 dwb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Thanks! >> >> But it didn't fix it

[sage-devel] Re: Unable to build develop branch

2021-01-23 Thread dwb...@gmail.com
er SAGEPKGCONFIG then it works, but I shouldn't need to do that. Dan On Friday, January 22, 2021 at 5:16:28 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote: > Great, I'm glad to hear it! > > Have you run doctests? If so, are there many failures? > > > On Friday, January 22, 2021 at

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Problems with 9.3.beta6 + OS X Big Sur

2021-02-07 Thread dwb...@gmail.com
Even after applying the fix in #31344 I still get a similar crash building the documentation. I am attaching my dochtml.log. Daniel Bump On Friday, February 5, 2021 at 11:24:59 AM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > Fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31344 > > On Thursday, February 4, 2021 at

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Problems with 9.3.beta6 + OS X Big Sur

2021-02-08 Thread dwb...@gmail.com
With this, I can now build the documentation. (Thanks!) On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 1:16:38 PM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > Please try the current branch on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31344, > we have added another fix. > > On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 6:11:55

[sage-devel] Re: question about weyl_dimension

2021-02-12 Thread dwb...@gmail.com
It looks like Sage is constructing the wrong crystals for the two spin weights. D5 does have two irreducible representations of dimensions 210 and 126 but their highest weights are not the spin weights s1=(1/2,1/2,1/2,1/2,1/2) and s2=(1/2,1/2,1/2,1/2,-1/2) which are the two fundamental weights.

[sage-devel] Re: question about weyl_dimension

2021-02-12 Thread dwb...@gmail.com
er be returning CrystalOfSpins, > CrystalOfSpinsPlus, CrystalOfSpinsMinus. > > So, maybe we should use dominant.to_ambient? > > Martin > dwb...@gmail.com schrieb am Freitag, 12. Februar 2021 um 16:52:02 UTC+1: > >> It looks like Sage is constructing the wrong crystals for the two spin &

[sage-devel] Pynac problem with Big Sur

2021-02-13 Thread dwb...@gmail.com
Last week I was able to build sage, and the documentation on Big Sur (MacOS 11.2.1) after the fixes in Trac tickets #31183 and #31344. There was another update to Xcode last week. When I first went to rebuild sage, it failed building cython. I updated homebrew and then I was able to build cytho

Re: [sage-devel] Pynac problem with Big Sur

2021-02-13 Thread dwb...@gmail.com
> source .homebrew-build-env Thank you, after that I was able to build sage. Dan On Saturday, February 13, 2021 at 9:30:57 AM UTC-8 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 1:35 PM dwb...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > Last week I was able to build sage, and the docume