On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:07:03 -, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, somehow I knew this was going to become a trac ticket. It is
> also my suspicion that it is an optimization issue with number
> fields. It seems really bizarre that it should be calling a
> polynomial ring const
gt;>> [20, 160, 200, 340]
> > > >>> sage: [x for x in R if x^2 == 40] # Brute force
> > > >>> verification
> > > >>> [20, 160, 200, 340]
> > > >>> sage: R(1).sqrt(all=True)
>
Hi everybody,
The slides of Martin and my talk are available at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/tmp/talk/.
An accompanying SAGE worksheet can be found at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/malb/SAGE_Demo.sws
. Feedback is very welcome :-)
William
--
William Stein
Associate
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:27:45 -, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, I didn't know I was going to get quoted! (That's fine, of
> course.)
>
> Are we suppose to write "SAGE" since it's an acronym or "Sage" like
> you do?
Write "Sage". There used to be an acronym, but the acronym no l
> while p % 4 != 1:
> p = next_prime(p+1)
>
> for i in range(0,n):
> A[i] = GF(p).random_element()
>
> #print 'Original:'
> #time X = go1(p)
> #analyseResult(A,X,p)
>
> print 'Tonelli:'
> time X = go2(p)
> analyseResult(
function).
>
> If I change this line to
>
> import sage.rings as rings
>
> then Sage gives me a Unhandled SIGSEGV.
>
> Help, JV
>
>
>
> >
>
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-
On Nov 11, 2007 9:06 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on a new .pyx file, and everything has been working okay,
> but something strange is now happening, and I can't quite get to the
> bottom of it.
>
> Some side notes- I am running on OS X 10.5, a fresh install of
> sage
gs=0xbf8f6b88) at Python/pythonrun.c:1271
> #27 0x080e2fa9 in PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags (fp=,
> filename=0xbf8f739a ".doctest_binary_code.py", closeit=1,
> flags=0xbf8f6b88) at Python/pythonrun.c:877
> #28 0x08056d0f in Py_Main (argc=1, argv=0xbf8f6c24) at Modules/main.c
On Nov 13, 2007 12:32 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Questions: Should inheriting __hash__ implementations in a cython class work?
Just a trivial remark, yes, it actually does work as the following
simple example shows:
{{{
%cython
cdef class A:
def __hash__(self):
On Nov 13, 2007 1:35 AM, Téragone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm also working on a GUI for pari/gp. I started with mathGuide from which I
> removed the Python plugin
Wow, thanks for pointing out mathGuide, which I had never heard about before.
Since this is in English, I translation of the web
Perhaps a
German speaker could look at
http://www.math.uni-siegen.de/ring/mathGUIde
and confirm this.
William
>
> ++++++++
>
>
> On Nov 12, 2007 9:33 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 13, 2007 1:35 AM, Téragone &
http://sagemath.org/talks/20071114-sage_bristol/
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group
On Nov 15, 2007 1:45 AM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I discovered Sage recently and am very excited about it. In grad school,
> I came to be very good with Mathematica, and am now doing a postdoc
> where I only have access to (an old copy of) Maple. I like the idea of
> having my math
On Nov 15, 2007 7:49 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > f := x -> integrate(exp(t^2), t=0..x); (Maple)
> > evalf(f(2));
...
>
> You can define that function and compute the integral in Sage as
> follows:
>
> sage: assume(x > 0)
&g
Hi,
I've created a page on the wiki for photos from Sage Days 6:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/days6/pictures
If anybody posts photos online from the workshop, please put a link
there. There
are already hundreds of photos that Jaap Spies posted.
-- William
--~--~-~--~~--
has no inverse if we require the exponents of x and y
> > to be bounded away from negative infinity.
> > David
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> John Cremona
>
>
> >
>
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wst
On Nov 16, 2007 9:05 AM, Paul Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way I started translating my program to extend aliquot sequences from
> MuPAD to SAGE. I figured out that the ECM.find_factor() and ECM.factor()
> functions perform a full factorization.
>
> What I need is a function that
e-trial:
> > trial: not found
> > However, an ERROR occurred in the Distributed SAGE unit tests.
> > Testing SAGE documentation
> > Testing SAGE tutorial
> > /afs/nada.kth.se/pkg/sage/src/sage-2.8.12/local/bin/sage-maketest:
> > /afs/nada.kth.se/pkg/sage/src/
On Nov 15, 2007 4:31 PM, Michael Abshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > sgray:sage-2.8.12>./sage -testall
> > This script will run the unit tests for DSage
> > /afs/nada.kth.se/pkg/sage/src/sage-2.8.12/local/bin/sage-dsage-trial:
> > line 17: trial: command not found
> > However, an ERROR occu
On Nov 16, 2007 1:57 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is the Thanksgiving weekend, and as such is probably
> > significantly better or significantly worse for people living in
> > America. For me, I will be traveling and not able to participate.
> >
>
> Yep, Thanksgiving is cert
information in one place instead of
> having to crawl over sagemath.org to find them all.
>
> Fixing up sagemath.org, especially pages that are not the main
> index.html, and updating information on the wiki is also something I
> would consider to be part of marketing. We ca
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:29:27 -0800, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been thinking about how to implement interactive widgets in the
> notebook. Things like sliders, buttons, etc., that allow interactivity
> like Maplets in Maple or the Manipulate command in Mathematica 6.
> Here's a
omething that
> > makes sense and is good for SAGE.
> >
>
> Yep. It might even make it possible to ship some "Sage not so light"
> version specifically targeted at the high school/educational market if
> we ever decide to do such a thing.
>
> > Ondrej
:-) Hey Tom Boothby, shouldn't you chime up about now?
William
> Can we just attach a "widget" property to any object in Sage? That way
> "a" could be, say, a number, but it would have a "a.widget" which would
> encapsulate the necessary wi
Hi,
The top article on slashdot *right now* is about "Open Source Math
Software" and my opinion piece
in the Notices of the AMS:
http://science.slashdot.org/science/07/11/18/1341232.shtml
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washi
On Nov 18, 2007 12:59 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Joyner and William Stein published an opinion piece in the
> AMS Notices raising (yet again) the issue of mathematical results
> that depend on closed source symbolic mathematics. They would like
> to see open sou
On Nov 18, 2007 3:49 PM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One possible other source for funding is NIST (although the year that
> I thought to apply they only had funding for prior project, no new
> money available).
>
> An outstanding problem is that we have many different computer algebra
> and
On Nov 18, 2007 6:06 PM, Ted Kosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William wrote:
>
> > The top article on slashdot *right now* is about "Open Source Math
> > Software" and my opinion piece
> > in the Notices of the AMS:
> >
> > http://science.slashdot.org/science/07/11/18/1341232.shtml
>
> Some
On Nov 19, 2007 3:46 AM, D.J. Keenan <> wrote:
> I just saw your opinion piece in Notices of the AMS.
> Naturally I am wondering about Maple, which is (a)
> Mathematica's main competitor and (b) very largely
> open source. What is your opinion about using Maple?
> (I use Maple, but have no affili
differences in that aspect between Mathematica, Maple, and Maxima
> (depending on the GUI) are no big enough to say that Maxima plays in another
> league.
>
> Best:
>
>
> Miguel Marco Buzunariz
> Departamento de Matematicas
> Universidad de Zaragoza.
>
> __
t; athttp://science.slashdot.org/science/07/11/18/1341232.shtml. I think
>
> > it'd be a good venue to get some Sage publicity in.
> >
> > --Mike
> >
>
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~
On Nov 18, 2007 9:37 AM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just noticed that there is an article on the front page of slashdot
> about William and David's AMS opinion piece at
> http://science.slashdot.org/science/07/11/18/1341232.shtml . I think
> it'd be a good venue to get some Sage p
On Nov 19, 2007 8:29 AM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
> > 3. Dumb question -- Where is the actual source code of anything in Maple?
> > I'm skimming through my Maple install to see some actual source code
> > and
&g
On Nov 19, 2007 8:57 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 3. Dumb question -- Where is the actual source code of anything in Maple?
> > > I'm skimming through my Maple install to see some actual source code
> > > and
> > >
On Nov 19, 2007 9:20 AM, somebody defending Maple wrote:
> William,
>
> There are two ways to see the source code in Maple:
> eval(procname);
> and
> showstat(procname);
> Before doing that, it is usually necessary to change the
> interface setting for displaying library procedures:
>
On Nov 19, 2007 9:38 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2007 12:21 PM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > at Sage Days 6 Stefan Müller-Stach
> >
> >http://hodge.mathematik.uni-mainz.de/~stefan/index.html
> >
> > babelfish translation:
>
On Nov 19, 2007 9:49 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My suggestion for such a project is: compute all the S-integral
> points on an elliptic curve (which is a finite set, for any given
> finie set of primes S). First, over Q (assume that you are given a
> Mordell-Weil basis), whi
On Nov 19, 2007 10:44 AM, <> wrote:
> I wanted to commend you for leading Sage. I think it is a great idea
> to combine all the open source math apps out there into a unified whole.
Thanks!
> I'm curious about your integration component. I believe I read you
> were using Maxima but were inter
On Nov 19, 2007 10:52 AM, Stephen Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So you have to pay extra for the comments! Wow. That's truly bizarre.
>
> Hmm, I am a former Maplesoft employee, and I have never, ever heard of
> the source code being available for reading for an extra price. I am
> not
On Nov 19, 2007 11:02 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:49:52AM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> > > Perhaps making a syntax compatible with Mathematica's??
> >
> > No, that's definitely not planned.
> >
> > William
Hi,
On OSX ppc the sage alpha1 build fails with this. Unfortunately, I
can't work on fixing this since
I have committee work to do right now. If we can't fix this, a
reasonable option is to just comment
out building the cremona code in setup.py for now, and put some
nodoctests in the top
of th
e: g / f
> > > + sage: g // f
> > > 9 81 432 1404 2928 4486 4880 3900 2000 625
> > > sage: f^4
> > > 9 81 432 1404 2928 4486 4880 3900 2000 625
> >
> > > So, any idea why we need "//"
running OS X
10.5, i.e., bsd.math.washington.edu.
If you want to try building and testing FLINT on it, let me know off
list and I'll create an account for you.
>
> Bill.
>
> On 20 Nov, 02:38, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 19, 2007 5:13 PM, Bill Hart <
ally it returns the same thing as what Magma returns when
> you type f div g. It's a kind of normalised division, which just
> happens to be the quotient when the division is exact.
That's like integer division in python, where:
>>>
On Nov 19, 2007 7:46 PM, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some kind of compiler bug. I've made changes in rev 1072 of FLINT
> which should fix the problem. If not, we'll have to wait for Mabshoff
> to awaken. I've no other ideas, so there's no point in setting me up
> with an account on the
asily close trac #1005!!
NOTE - I also tested cvxopt building, and it works fine too.
-- Wiliam
On Nov 19, 2007 7:56 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 7:46 PM, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Some kind of compiler bug. I've ma
# Let rels = rels union I relations.
>
> /home/was/s/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/modular/modsym/relation_matrix.py
> in modS_relations(syms)
> 99 for i in xrange(len(syms)):
> 100 j, s = syms.apply_S(i)
> --> 101 assert j != -1
> 102
On Nov 20, 2007 11:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As to syntax, I think in Python we could use:
> > >>> integrate(cos(x), (x, -pi/2, pi/2))
> > Because then you can
> > use the syntax:
> >
> > integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi))
> >
> > for multiple integral
On Nov 21, 2007 8:17 AM, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, I needed some calculation period benchmark for pairings. I could
> not find anything build in, but the following implementation solved my
> problem:
>
> http://maths.straylight.co.uk/archives/104
Thanks! I've made adding this to
1784 return self.__torsion_subgroup
>1785
>
> /usr/local/sage-2.8.12/sage/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/rational_torsion.py
> in __init__(self, E, flag)
> 54 G = self.__E.pari_curve().elltors(flag)
> 55
On Nov 19, 2007 11:49 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 6:12 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just did a test and using the new version of g95 here:
> >
> >http://ftp.g95.org/g95-x86-osx
hange the title of the link to Sage on the
"python math lab" webpage from
" SAGE: System for Arithmetic Geometry Experimentation, a CAS
developed by William Stein et.al."
to
" SAGE: Open Source Mathematical Software, a Python-based CAS
developed by William Stein et al.&
tion. This will be straightened out soon.)"
So is anybody interested in thinking through how this could perhaps be
made a standard and useful part of Sage? Let me know.
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~
On Nov 21, 2007 11:16 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a project that I have meant to tackle myself, but I doubt I
> will have time to do it for at least a year, so someone can beat me to
> it (just let me know!):
>
> Write a parallellized (DSage!) algorithm/implementation to com
Weinmann
- Robert Bradshaw
- William Stein
- Willem Jan Palenstijn
Sorry if I forgot anybody, it has been quite a turbulent release
cycle. Thanks to all the reviewers, all the testers, especially
Jaap Spies, and please send me patches for the doctest failures.
Cheers,
Michael Abshoff (release
re
> complicated to implement but the essence of what you want seems simple enough
> conceptually. Instead of creating the ParentWithOutGens, maybe just go back
> into
> sage.structure.parent.Parent?
>
> In your example of an elliptic curve, it is possible that you do have
>
On Nov 22, 2007 7:31 AM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You should make an AbstractAbelianGroup class that derives from
> > ParentWithBase.
>
> Hmmm but wouldn't it make more sense for AbelianGroup (i.e. the
> currently implemented one) to derive from AbstractAbelianGroup?
Yes, i
/ondra/ext/sage-2.8.13-i686-Linux/local/bin/sage-sage: line 149:
> 6136 Alarm clock "$SAGE_ROOT/local/bin/"sage-location
>
> Automatically updating the cached Gap workspace:
> /home/ondra/.sage//gap/workspace-468476148
> sage:
> Exiting SAGE (CPU time 0m0.01s,
On Nov 22, 2007 5:20 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > : libcsage.so: cannot open shared
> > object file: No such file or directory
> >
> >
> > So I think it's better to build it from source, right?
>
> libcsage.so is missing in the binary, "sage -b" fixes that.
That's very weird. In
ot; correctly
> returns 2.8.13.
>
> sage: version()
> 'SAGE Version 2.8.13, Release Date: 2007-11-21'
>
> Details: OS X, version 10.4.10/Core Duo 2/original version of sage
> 2.7.1, upgraded several times.
>
> Best,
>
On Nov 23, 2007 8:18 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is all really weird since I fully tested building Sage-2.8.13 on
> > OSX 10.4 intel and OSX 10.5 intel (both core duo and Xeon),
> > and didn't have any problems at all. So the problem could
> > be with...
...
> I repo
On Nov 22, 2007 11:16 AM, a concerned Maple user and AMS reader wrote:
> William,
>
> Most Maple source code is open for inspection, as well as modification and
> extension. Hence the code is "open source". Maplesoft sometimes uses that
> term, I and believe they are correct in doing so. Having
On Nov 23, 2007 2:41 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wall time: 0.02
> > sage: time w = tt.Factorization()
> > CPU times: user 0.00 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.00 s
> > Wall time: 0.01
> > sage: time w = tt.Factorization()
> > CPU times: user 0.00 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.00 s
> > Wa
On Nov 23, 2007 7:15 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:08:02AM -0800, mabshoff wrote:
> > Hello Joel,
> >
> > > I'm also posting this
> > > athttp://www.singular.uni-kl.de/forum/viewforum.php?f=10
> > > as soon as I get registered on the forum.
> > >
> >
On Nov 22, 2007 7:59 PM, Nathan Dunfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try doing
> >
> > sage: hg_scripts.merge()
> > sage: hg_scripts.commit()
> >
> > and answer any interactive questions.
...
> If I follow the suggestion of .merge() I get
>
> sage: hg_scripts.update()
> cd "/pkgs/sage-2.7.1/loc
On Nov 23, 2007 3:58 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > Sage 2.8.13 has been released. Sources are and binaries should soon be
> > available at
> >
> > http://sagemath.org/download.html
>
> I did a full build of 2.8.13 on two systems:
>
> Mac OS
On Nov 24, 2007 8:36 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 23 November 2007 22:46, mabshoff wrote:
> > Bill has fixed a couple of bugs in flint since r1072 that were corner
> > cases that only happened on Core Duos, so I have updated the spkg to
> > r1075. It is available at
z_poly.c:222: error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@~Y undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > fmpz_poly.c:222: error: expected [EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED] before
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@~Y
> > make: *** [fmpz_poly.o] Error 1
> > Error building flint shared library.
> >
On Nov 24, 2007 4:24 PM, Paul Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fortunately, it's close enough to the MIT license, that if you pointed
> > these flaws out to him, he might change.
>
> Yeah, I did fly by night thing. What I wanted was to put companies
> like SCO into legal trouble if they atte
On Nov 24, 2007 3:22 AM, Hans Fangohr <> wrote:
> I have just come across your SAGE project, and just wanted to
> congratulate on it (don't waste time to reply). I, too, believe that
> Python is the right interface for this kind of thing. (So we have
> developed a big numerical simulation (mostly
Ondrej:
> > Povray is not open source (so it has to be in Debian non-free), so I
> > don't think SAGE should depend on or use povray.
Ondrej, thanks for sharing your opinion.
Boothby:
> Sage doesn't need to distribute / depend upon non-free software.
> However, it does have interfaces to lots of
Thanks! And thanks again for a great Python library.
-- William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsu
On Nov 24, 2007 8:29 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2007 11:47 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps this is due to sys.path not containing Extensions yet for some
> > reason (I'm not aware why this is not a problem on my box).
> >
> > To get over i
On Nov 24, 2007 11:22 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 24, 2007 8:29 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Oct 17, 2007 11:47 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Perhaps this is due to sys.path
On Nov 25, 2007 4:06 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2007 5:19 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Some of the Sage developers are considering including Pyx
> > (http://pyx.sourceforge
On Nov 25, 2007 11:52 AM, David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have to agree. The slide where you list p-adic numbers, p-adic
> L-functions and p-adic height pairings kinda jumped out at me. While I'm
> obviously interested in that kind of stuff, it won't appeal as much to a
> non-specialist
On Nov 25, 2007 12:13 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> I've been thinking about
>
> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1135
>
> for about 2 days now. I can think of no obvious way to handle the
> following three cases:
>
> R. = PolynomialRing(ZZ) # names should be
On Nov 25, 2007 2:14 PM, C Y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Third, even if the NSF funded SAGE, how would those funds benefit the
> >> various subprojects like Axiom? Open source is mostly volunteer work
> >> done in "spare time". While it is amusing to daydream of being paid to
> >> develop open
On Nov 25, 2007 7:54 PM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> Third, even if the NSF funded SAGE, how would those funds benefit the
> >> >> various subprojects like Axiom? Open source is mostly volunteer work
> >> >> done in "spare time". While it is amusing to daydream of being paid to
> >> >>
On Nov 25, 2007 6:33 PM, David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Addition not commuting there bothers me. I can see why it's happening: a
> SymPy object doesn't call into the coercion system. One possible solution
> is to have coercion map sage objects into sympy, so both s+o and o+s (in
> line 1
Hi,
Willem Jan Palenstijn created a clever system for timing each and every doctest.
This is now trac #1276:
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1276
I hope somebody will try it out and perhaps make it so adding it to sage is as
simple as me or Michael applying a patch :-).
--
William
(nil)
(nil))
ZmodF_mul.c:656: internal compiler error: in get_attr_first_insn, at
config/ia64/itanium2.md:1839
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
make: *** [ZmodF_mul.o] Error 1
--
William Stein
Associate Profes
On Nov 25, 2007 9:52 PM, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is a compiler bug which we've seen before. On Itanium the build
> should not be using the -funroll-loops flag.
>
> I guess we need to check for ia64 when setting the compiler flags?
The culprit is this line, which is now in pa
r.t_test(range(100))
CPU times: user 1.97 s, sys: 0.12 s, total: 2.08 s
Wall time: 2.09
{'alternative': 'two.sided',
'conf.int': [499433.7061652476, 500565.2938347524],
'data.name': '0:99',
'estimate': {'mean of x&
On Nov 25, 2007 10:01 PM, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does uname -m yield ia64? If so I'll add this to the latest revision
> of FLINT. I think currently it only checks for AIX.
Yes, uname -m yields ia64.
But the problem is entirely in sloppiness with sage's packaging for
itanium (i.
On Nov 25, 2007 10:07 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Hansen and I have put some work into making it possible to very
> easily use R from Sage, and are
> even maybe considering including R in Sage.This is very likely
> definitely not ready yet
: Compiling sage-2.8.14 on Opensuse-10.2
To: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is just to let you know that compilation of sage fails on
OpenSuse-10.2 since version 2.8.13( version 2.8.12 compiles ok). Here is
the relevant part of install.log:
gcc -std=c99 -I/windows/C/apps/sage-2.
On Nov 26, 2007 12:20 AM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >> Third, even if the NSF funded SAGE, how would those funds benefit the
> ...[snip]...
> >> Either the initial grant had principal investigators at different
> >> schools (or one of the PIs moved), or a visiting scientist arrangemen
g gcc-4.2.3, which sage-2.8.13 doesn't support.
*Fortunately* we just released sage-2.8.14, which does support
gcc-4.2.x:
http://sagemath.org/dist/src
>
> >
>
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~--
On Nov 26, 2007 3:04 AM, Joerg Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 24.11.07, William Stein wrote:
> > Some of the Sage developers are considering including Pyx
> > (http://pyx.sourceforge.net/)
> > in Sage (http://sagemath.org).One issue is
On Nov 26, 2007 6:34 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, if I had to pick a nasty point to sage I would agree that it's huge-ness
> is seriously annoying. The slow import of "sage.all" really kills the
> pleasure for writing python programs which you want to use from bash, but I
On Nov 26, 2007 10:01 AM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ==> Ed Borasky writes:
> >> There is nothing particularly special about mathematics software that
> >> makes it winning in a similar sense impossible, as much as Wolfram
> >> would argue that (as he often used to do in interviews I've re
On Nov 26, 2007 1:11 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> exactly what I need, but fortnuately, this will improve,
> when SAGE becomes more famous, and more people like Michael Abshoff
> are going to join. I am looking forward to a time,
> when I do in Debian:
>
> $ apt-get install sage
On Nov 26, 2007 1:11 PM, fwc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dortmund.de> wrote:
> > this bothered me enough to finally investiagte. So far I found out:
> >
> > * this is an issue only on OSX 10.4, OSX 10.5 is not effected
> > * It isn't the gmp's fault, but libntl.dynlib hardcodes the path to
> >
On Nov 26, 2007 7:51 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 26, 2007, at 2:04 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> >>
> >> I still think _verify_canonical_coercion_c is the wrong thing to use
> >> here, there is no reason that x._sage_() and y._sage_() should have
> >> the same parent (
On Nov 26, 2007 8:06 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> root wrote:
> > The NSF, INRIA, and others cover it.
> > These are the same people who won't fund Axiom because "it competes
> > with commercial software". Which shows that they don't understand
> > that Axiom is NOT tryi
ical examples which can be
pasted into a notebook cell like above, you might want to post some to
this thread.
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFHS8G+r4V8SljC5LoRAiIyAKCU+DfZU/2NA2qUBrrjz/ohyHxWFACfTiEJ
> zwvYBTCUp0x/4nVpcfFViR4=
> =Q2Ew
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Was
5 924 315 70 21 0 1
> 14833 14832 7420 2464 630 112 28 0 1
> 133496 133497 66744 22260 5544 1134 168 36 0 1
> 1334961 1334960 667485 222480 55650 11088 1890 240 45 0 1
> 14684570 14684571 7342280 2447445 611820 122430 20328 2970 330 55 0 1
> }}}
>
> {{{id=4|
> derangements(0,0)
r(self._center),
> # >tostr(self._rotate),
> #tostr(self._scale))
> # new code:
> return """%s center %s rotate %s scale %s"""%(tostr(self._type),
> # <-- string
>
1 - 100 of 9558 matches
Mail list logo
