gher
number of developers committed to symbolics (of course) rather than
SAGE. At the same time, I think that SAGE can make a big step forward,
once its community focuses on this task!
Thanks a lot
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email
he worksheet was not there anymore. By pressing "Discard
and quit", it was moved to the "Active" folder.
Is this desirable? I don't think so. I was actually very afraid I
could have lost it, but then I just found it in Active.
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~--
rting points of the new CAS. I'm
sure you can give a lot of good (potentially constructive) advices,
and I'm sure people here are really willing to listen for them.
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@goo
t we can start working on
building something on top of it. I am not even sure if something in
Pynac engine is not going under some rewriting or development. But I
think that 4.0 is coming soon!
I would be glad to hear your impressions and to be updated on your
work :)
Regards
Maurizio
On 2 Mag, 20:53,
could help people to fall into
SAGE by looking for something else in google :)
I know this looks pretty useless, since nowadays everybody should
speak English, yet I know universities are still full of people not
necessarily fluent in English.
Regards
files. Is there any guideline for Sphinx syntax?
If the current documentation is not there, which is the most updated
source?
Moreover, how are the available translations made public? I don't see
any advertisement.
Thanks
Regards
Maurizio
On 22 Mag, 09:10, Franco Saliola wrote:
> On Thu,
ction, with the name
"solve_numerical" or something like that, so that when I do "sol[Tab]"
I get all the functions related to solving an equation, whatever the
domain.
Regards
Maurizio
On 15 Giu, 17:08, Jason Grout wrote:
> paramaniac wrote:
> > Dear Sage Developers,
x27;s still pending, or it has been done, so that
some documentation to new design could be helpful, given that Dirac
delta implementation should rely on that.
Thanks
Maurizio
On 17 Giu, 13:56, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi Golam,
>
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:38:16 -0300
> Golam Mortu
uch of them,
but I'm sure there are many similar physical problems, that would take
advantage of plotting deltas.
Thanks again
Maurizio
On 23 Giu, 19:02, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
> Thanks David, Tim, Burcin!
>
> Correct me if I have missed your points. With your suggestions
>
As a clarification of what I was talking about, see this:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ImpulsePair.html
Regards
Maurizio
On 23 Giu, 23:45, Maurizio wrote:
> Many kudos for this!
>
> Honestly, I don't actually know whether it means that much, but at
> this point I think
I agree. We could do something like plotting all the deltas with a
stem plot and then superimposing the rest of the plot
Maurizio
On 24 Giu, 04:21, David Roe wrote:
> One way would be to have a vertical ray that doesn't change the scaling of
> the rest of the graph (just goes to the
everybody.
Regards
Maurizio
On Jul 18, 2:57 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Golam,
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Golam Mortuza
>
> Hossain wrote:
>
>
>
> > I could implement above rather easily by exposing underlying Ginac
> > feature. However, I am not
the
> above issue to keep working with fderivative of pynac?
>
> Or should we just restore old "diff" by simply sub-classing it
> from SFunction like what is being done for "integration"
> and others?
>
> Cheers,
> Golam
At the very end, my personal opi
ch an appreciable initiative. I hope that it relies on well
spread standards like SPICE or SPECTRE netlist
Thanks for focusing on this as well :)
Maurizio
On Jul 26, 10:24 pm, David Joyner wrote:
> This seems interesting.
>
> I teach circuits and networks every semester as an application of
>
that is wonderful!!
by the way, I am looking forward to see those LTI and Fourier
Transform features applied to our powerful symbolic system :D
Maurizio
On Jul 26, 9:23 pm, Rafael Cardoso Dias Costa
wrote:
> The problem is solved!
>
> http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/677/
>
>
That's great! Congratulations!
maurizio
On 4 Ago, 18:09, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> > Can you pattern match on it? It's really irritating to do subs/
> > pattern matching on the existing derivatives.
&g
hCAD,
since it supports units, and has proven pretty handful in the past.
I would like very much to have units supported in symbolic equations:
eq1 = x^2 + 2m * x + 1 m^2 = 0
solve(eq1) -> x = -1 m
:)
Regards
Maurizio
PS: that will result very useful, I appreciate that you accept
suggest
this useful, but if that doesn't
require too much work (as I hope), I think this could help a lot
people coming from MatLab.
Thanks
Maurizio
On 28 Ago, 00:38, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
>
> > The Sage not
On 29 Ago, 19:21, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Maurizio wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi!
> > I have a question.
> > Would you please consider adding a feature in the notebook, if you
> > happen to work on this?
>
> > My desire wou
ing to me (will I be able to look
at typeset output as well?)
Anyway, if that's so useful (as I hope) it looks reasonable to me to
make this more accessible to other people, or at least more
advertised! :)
Thanks and regards
Maurizio
On 30 Ago, 12:32, Pierre wrote:
> Maurizio, you shou
thanks guys :)
it was just an issue with missing environmental variables like
SAGE_ROOT I think, in the .emacs file.
now I hardcoded the directory where SAGE is, and I'm (slowly) going to
try sage-mode
thanks everybody!
maurizio
On 31 Ago, 10:51, Pierre wrote:
> maurizio, you should
needed for the units package.
>
> E.g.,
>
> meter = var('meter', docstring="A meter is...", latex_name="m")
>
By the way, which is the status of the units package? Is the code
somewhere on the net? I'm quite curious! :)
Regards
Maurizio
>
&g
Why don't we close this ticket?
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4566
There seems to be already a quite reasonable explanation to do this in
its comments
Maurizio
On 4 Set, 15:34, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi Jason and anybody interested in symbolics in Sage,
>
> On Fri,
ation teams! For example:
the number of elements of the Italian translation team of Ubuntu is
just 16.
Otherwise, I think that the translation process can become VERY
frustrating
My 2 cents
Maurizio
On Sep 9, 9:50 am, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
> John
he word "solve"?
I don't know whether this is generally a good thing to do, but I just
keep finding it so easy if I do "solve[Tab]" so that ALL the functions
related to solving equations are shown (both exact and numerical)
cheers
maurizio
On Sep 17, 4:52 pm, Burcin
Wouldn't be better if there was some sort of triangular end which
points to the exact thick (when they are plotted)? Without them, the
slider look a bit "approximate" or "inexact" :)
On Sep 18, 6:14 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> > I've attache
nts, I hope you can catch the usefulness
of this (if any) :P
Thanks, and regards
Maurizio
PS: feel free to ask me for many more insights, if I've not been clear
enough
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To u
>
After all, I'd be glad to see if any interest is shown in this
direction, since there is a reasonable amount of work around the
notebook now. Otherwise, thank you for the discussion :)
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to
Can't we take advantage of inheritance for this issue? I don't know
how far that can go, though, I'm not a programmer...
Thanks
Maurizio
On Sep 28, 9:40 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> > First of all, thank you
hat I wouldn't like to switch back to an old maxima,
so we should at least wait for them fixing it... maybe we can help on
that
regards
Maurizio
On 16 Ott, 22:55, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> On 16 říj, 22:44, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:> I am. I will
> write
gards
Maurizio
On 17 Ott, 00:04, Dorian Raymer wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> We have merged a big development effort into the master
> repository<http://github.com/codenode/codenode>
> !
>
> This represents a milestone in the ongoing effort to bring the whole design
> to a new s
tools out there, but maybe providing a service like this could
improve the translation process a lot.
Think about that
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an
tation for netlists. Maybe you could introduce the mechanical
equivalent of those :)
Regards
Maurizio
On 23 Ott, 22:05, kstueve wrote:
> Have any of you heard of Erik Neumann? He published some excellent
> Java physics demos athttp://www.myphysicslab.com/ He is in Seatle,
> and has atte
(or any other vastly widespread
distribution) to me is much less prone to problems, in the sense that
there is also much more support on Internet, because of the wide
adoption.
My 2 cents
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-d
ease, rather than fearing
that something goes wrong because of a simple bug, and discovering it
just one day before the deadline (if not worse!).
I hope this will be useful to the community.
Best regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an
ks correctly? Shouldn't it
come almost directly from checking the working upgrade of every single
current version?
Best regards
Maurizio
On 25 Ott, 15:48, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>
>
>
> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 24, 2009, a
Thank you Rob,
you seem to have caught my point 100%, I completely agree with your
comments
Maurizio
On Oct 26, 1:06 am, Rob Beezer wrote:
> We have a Sage server on our campus. We don't have departmental
> sysadmins, instead it is maintained by the same folks who do the
>
just some fine tuning. I hope
this amount of changes can be discussed openly, and that everybody can
help in this process.
Regards
Maurizio
On 26 Ott, 20:37, Nick Alexander wrote:
> On 26-Oct-09, at 11:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I wonder
lems are solved.
Thanks for discussing this
Regards
Maurizio
On 27 Ott, 17:54, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
>
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> >> Hi,
>
> >> I wonder
I have not taken any offense, on the contrary!
Thank you very much for your detailed answer.
Maurizio
On Oct 27, 10:41 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> > What about adopting a simpler strategy?
> > What do you think about this:
Hi,
let me give a quick reference for starting with ppa:
http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/launchpad-ppa-tips/
regards
Maurizio
On Oct 24, 5:30 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> The IRC logs show a recent conversation (again) about Sage packaging for
> Ubuntu. We all know it would be a massive
I honestly didn't get the chance to work with it, but when I installed
sage-mode in emacs, I found it very useful, because it does this
integration of a powerful editor (also sufficiently newbie friendly)
with a sage embedded terminal
Try sage-mode and emacs!! :)
Maurizio
On 17 Nov, 17:31
suggest improvements to achieve that, if needed.
Sorry for the long post, and keep up the good work!
Please, let me know if this post is unsuited for the sage-devel list,
so that I can address the support list.
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to th
01:03, David Joyner wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> ...
>
>
>
> > Example: it seems to me that there is no built-in implementation of
> > the "collect()" function in SAGE, though there is a (seemingly)
> > working one in Sym
work!
>
> Thanks.
>
> William
>
>
I hope I didn't seem you a jerk, even though I've raised a lot of
questions, I really find this a VERY good piece of software, and I use
it almost everyday!!
Thank you very much
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
do the substitution like this:
result = subList(expr, set)
Within the function, I just iterate the subs(expr, x = ) on the
number of list elements.
This seems to me much faster than using dictionaries, especially for
complex expressions.
Maurizio
> I'd do something like this:
>
>
or being so eager of improvements, but I
think that some good reference manuals, tutorials, and well indexed
WIKIs (I think wikis are hard to browse to catch what you're looking
for) are the very first step to get the most from your (developers)
efforts!
On 21 Feb, 12:59, Burcin Erocal wr
would it be so much additional work to put the results in a form that
a javascript or any other html-related language could digest?
I mean, I am still in the phase of getting information, but I don't
see how is it possible that Jmol makes possible to render complex 3d
structures, and make zoom an
ch package failing in doing its job?
thank you very much
PS: I still can't find any piece of information about pynac, is there
anything on the web?
Maurizio
On Feb 22, 7:25 am, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> > Hi Burcin,
>
= G_igr_d.subs(paramsd)
CPU time: 14.40 s, Wall time: 31.44 s
time G_id = subList(G_igr_d,params)
CPU time: 1.17 s, Wall time: 5.59 s
Why is it so? Please note that this has been done with SAGE : 'SAGE
Version 3.1.2, Release Date: 2008-09-19'
I've tried out this at home (but wit
#x27;d like to avoid passing through file saving and html() command (that
was the first try, but doesn't seem so polite).
Is there another way to do it? I mean, a way that could allow us to
make an spkg at the end, so something that doesn't need to modify the
no
uld go along by myself.
thanks
Maurizio
On Feb 23, 12:31 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Maurizio wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > sorry for kind of flooding this group, but I'm very eager to learn.
>
> > I'd like to understand how to add another javascript script to the
>
some example ASAP, so that you can judge yourself
and the decide what to do.
Regards
Maurizio
On Feb 23, 6:32 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 23, 9:00 am, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> > Kenny wrote:
> > > Is there any good reason for using flotr, protochart or any other
> > &
sibly taking the best from each backend (and in my
opinion using different packages even for the same area, such as
Pynac, Sympy, Maxima, etc for the symbolic calculus)
Regards
Maurizio
> The Sage symbolics is in a transitional state right now, but ideally
> a "normal user" shouldn
evious bode plot function relied on matplotlib), but I have some
doubts about whether the rendering time would be small enough to
provide a sufficiently satisfying user experience
I hope you will hear from us pretty soon
Regards
Maurizio
> As I understand it, matplotlib can do those sorts of
: "flot = 1" at the end of the bode() options.
Have fun!!!
Maurizio
On Feb 24, 5:13 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> kcrisman wrote:
> >> I think having a viewer='flot' would work well, so that you would do:
>
> >> p=plot(x^2, (x,0,10))
> >> show(p, v
ally scientists' job, but having a
good one is a real step ahead. And plot interactivity is a one million
dollar feature for people who deal with design and system performance
evaluation.
Maurizio
On 24 Feb, 20:43, Jason Grout wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb
Well, we honestly just hit F5 (that is reload in Firefox) to get the
original zoom. I know this is not really what you were looking for,
but for the first time, it should be more than enough ;)
I have no Mac, so I can't test it on Safari, sorry
Maurizio
On 24 Feb, 20:02, kcrisman
tions)?
thanks
Maurizio
On 23 Feb, 09:35, Maurizio wrote:
> People, please let me understand this! Let me give you my example so
> that you can help me recognizing where is my mistake
>
> I've this function:
>
> G_igr_d ( )
>
> (2*Iin*rCb/Lf + 2*Vb/Lf)*(s*rCf*(1/(Cf*rCf
e that the expression is coming from some matrix
combinations and then extraction
Regards
Maurizio
On Feb 25, 12:53 am, YannLC wrote:
> If I try your example at home with sage-3.3, I obtain:
>
> sage: time dizSub=G_igr_d.subs(paramsd)
> CPU times: user 0.03 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.
interfacing to any symbolic package different from the
ordinary maxima one? I don't exactly recall if I took advantage of
others.
Thanks
Maurizio
On Feb 25, 9:17 pm, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Maurizio wrote:
> > So I manually write down the same expression in a n
upting the process
Right now, I've saved into three .sobj the three key elements:
G_igr_d, paramsd, and the result of G_igr_d.subs(paramsd) (what you
called "bad_expr"), now can you show me a point where I can upload it
so that you can have a look?
I really appreciate
Regards
ance.
Anyway, FLOT is actively developed, so it could be a good idea to
later contact its developers to take advantage of their help, or at
least of their knowledge:
http://groups.google.com/group/flot-graphs
Regards
Kenny and Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To pos
You are certainly very kind.
I really appreciate your help. I'm going to email you the expressions.
Thank you
On 26 Feb, 18:15, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> > Carl,
> > I should thank you in advance for your great help.
&
another pleasantly impressed person interesting! :)
On 26 Feb, 16:48, kcrisman wrote:
> > I have no Mac, so I can't test it on Safari, sorry
>
> Sorry, I had popups disabled. Beautiful!
>
> - kcrisman
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
ibly) give comments
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_frm/thread/ae268923bcd768b8
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-deve
r
of points per decade)
Maurizio
On 26 Feb, 18:58, Tim Lahey wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Kenny wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I've done as you told me...
>
> >http://sagenb.org/home/pub/285/
>
> > this is the public worksheet. It launch a popup
k tends to
Infinity.
Is this feasible? Am I wrong when I interpret this way the Post's
formula?
Thanks
Maurizio
On 26 Feb, 19:10, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 26, 10:01 am, Maurizio wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi Maurizio,
>
> > has any of you ever needed the kth der
I don't know whether this can be helpful to anyone, but in Wikipedia
they cite another reference for this kind of derivatives computation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grunwald-Letnikov_differintegral
Regards
Maurizio
On 26 Feb, 19:23, Maurizio wrote:
> Well,
> I'm glad
lic system. The functions I use are:
solve and subs, symplify and expand, matrix operations ( + * **(-1) ),
matrix augmentation (augment), and then matrix extraction of elements
(by column and row index)
Any other info is needed? Hopefully this can fix an undiscovered bug,
or at least fix my mistake
matplotlib).
What do you think?
In case you agree, we would really appreciate some feedback about how
to speedup a bit the SAGE functions.
Regards
Maurizio
On 26 Feb, 11:56, Jason Grout wrote:
> Maurizio wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> > as you know, Kenny and me recently worked on a n
eek
Enjoy!!
Maurizio
On 27 Feb, 21:05, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> I do know that matplotlib works with dynamic backends, so I would
> imagine it would be able to do the job without a constantly poling
> the server.
>
> On Feb 27, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Kenny wrote:
>
>
>
>
to address this bug, but it seems definitely something
worth it, don't you think?
Thank you
Maurizio
On 27 Feb, 10:35, Kenny wrote:
> Sorry... i forgot to display the results:
>
> + True
> + False
>
> That means thebugis in thedumpor the load function!
>
> On Feb
rt/browse_frm/thread/ae268923bcd768b8
I would love to have something like this or anything else (I mentioned
the Post integration formula) to enhance the laplace transform (which
is really important to me)
Thanks
Maurizio
On 7 Mar, 22:17, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2
Is anybody interested in looking at this?
Thank you very much
On 8 Mar, 20:14, Maurizio wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was able to reproduce this in Sage 3.3
>
> var('a b c')
> first = a + b + c
> first._operands[0]._operands[0] is a
>
> True
>
> second
this is really meaningful to me, and a very positive feedback from
this wonderful community
thanks!
On 10 Mar, 21:24, "Georg S. Weber" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> trac ticket #5466 now has a positive review.
>
> Cheers,
> gsw
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, sen
ld be
very useful
With this, I'm not proposing this package over others (for example,
Unum looks very mature, but outdated), I'm just asking if one of you
can spend some minutes to review our trac ticket about units of
measurement (#3852), and to take some other decision
just talking out of couple of minutes working on it, I admit it.
Anyway, I'll try to get the other packages installed as well, although
I am not sure when. Any other suggestion or comment is very well
accepted!
Final comment: should I have done any other sage command to let it
reload or synchr
theless I am wondering if the other opportunities
out there (there are at least three, as you can see in the trac
ticket) have been previously explored to take some advantage! There
are non-trivial issues like compound units management that may have
already been successfully faced.
Regards
Thank you Jason, I'll try it as soon as possible.
By the way, have you got any idea about where in the code should I
look at to let it work with SAGE numbers? Something like constructors
or stuff like that?
Thanks
Maurizio
On 15 Mar, 02:29, Jason Grout wrote:
> Maurizio wrote:
&
and to ask them if they are willing
to work with us on making quantities compatible with one of our
symbolic packages? They seem pretty experienced about this package,
seem willing to improve their work, and this is (in my opinion) going
to be a VER
eters (or feets, or anything else)...
Regards
Maurizio
On 16 Mar, 00:55, "fergusno...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for emailing me Nicolas.
>
> I had a quick play with writing a units extension really just to learn
> more about SAGE. I've only just started
x2 = 39.76 inches
x2.unlock()
x2 = 1.01 m
PS: locking property could also be specified when instantiating an
object
2) changing the standard metric system (imperial / SI / any other) so
that by default each value is scaled as previously proposed
Any comment?
Thanks
Maurizio
On 16 Mar,
t know about it.
Thanks
Maurizio
On 19 Mar, 22:05, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I implementing the feature in the notebook before where it lists all
> users when you click on "Share". I thought this was nice, since you
> could chose the ones you want. There are now
Mar 19, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> > I know this is not being polite from me, but would you also consider
> > implementing folders in SAGE notebook?
>
> > I would really appreciate, since the number of my notebooks is growing
> > fast, and I'm wondering h
age about that! What do you think?
I would prefer to keep that package, and simply try to apply some
short differential patch to it to get a SAGE compatible version, but
I'm not sure if I'll be able to.
Thank you for your time
Maurizio
On 16 Mar, 19:29, Maurizio wrote:
> In fact my
about all the other facts?
Thanks
Maurizio
On 19 Mar, 23:48, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> > Hi
>
> > can anyone give an advice on how to adapt Quantities to let it be
> > compatible with SAGE? I don't know how S
nac???)
- NEW: labels in the notebook :) colors would be VERY nice as well!
I hope you don't ban me, but I can tell you I will come with many more
requests soon... I'm afraid to be to annoying, but I really enjoy this
stuff! Many thanks!
Regards
Maurizio
On 20 Mar, 00:20, Minh Nguyen wr
http://www.sagenb.org/pub/285/
Even though this has just a minor percentage of the whole lot of
possibility there, I'm still quite happy about that, I really hope you
guys have a look at that.
I hope your patience stays always this high, as you can see, I'm not
giving up so easily ;)
M
just probably end up losing a good occasion, because things
are not ready yet (although I hope that's not the case)!
Regards
Maurizio
On 20 Mar, 01:01, Jason Grout wrote:
> Maurizio wrote:
> > Hi
>
> > can anyone give an advice on how to adapt Quantities to let it be
>
But I think we need some effort to further develop
that... hopefully I'll push for that :)
Regards
Maurizio
Let me throw this stone, it's just something that pops into my mind
now: do you know what simulink is? That is a unique feature of MatLab
(actually it's a toolbox), which ha
ython-quantities-developers
Thanks
Maurizio
-- Forwarded message --
From: Maurizio Granato
Date: Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:39 PM
Subject: Quantities chance to spread
To: python-quantities-develop...@lists.launchpad.net
Hello guys,
I'm Maurizio, an electronic engineer w
I've opened a question on their launchpad project:
https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/python-quantities/+question/64894
I hope you guys share my feelings, so that I've been a good ambassador
Regards
Maurizio
On 21 Mar, 19:28, Jason Grout wrote:
> Maurizio wrote:
> > I
I agree... but what about magnitude and argument of the complex
number? I find this representation often more useful than real and
imaginary, so I think it's just a matter of the application.
+1 from me
Maurizio
On 21 Mar, 22:28, Henryk Trappmann wrote:
> As I see there are no speci
out there. I'm not saying we
should include REDUCE, also because I don't know whether maxima guys
at least made z transform available, but I think we should at least
consider taking some advantage from their open source code, especially
if we are now working so hard i
ngle version.
I still encourage you guys to at least give your comments
Regards and thanks everybody
Maurizio
On 23 Mar, 21:03, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 20, 10:31 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> >> Maurizio
share/contrib/
Thank you very much
Maurizio
On 23 Mar, 16:16, Robert Dodier wrote:
> Minh Nguyen wrote:
> > As regards a Maxima package for z transform, I think Alasdair McAndrew
> > has written such a package about 2 years ago.
>
> More recently I've written some z-
#x27;t get the point of removing stuff for engineers,
how could this help them (I should say, us)? I think good examples and
documentation would be SO MUCH better to have!
My 2 cents
Maurizio
On 25 Mar, 16:09, rjf wrote:
> I think that you probably miss the point. Most engineers are not
>
nsidered as a possible enhancement. This would be really useful to
improve notebook usability.
At the very end, I'm afraid we would be implementing something like
Notepad++ (just an example) within the browser... Isn't there any
firefox plugin or stuff like that to directly provide this?
Than
o get those improvements I was
talking about in the previous posts
Regards
Maurizio
On 29 Mar, 15:38, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Jason Grout wrote:
> > Maurizio wrote:
> >> Let me throw this stone, it's just something that pops into my mind
> >> now: do you know what sim
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
