spin_weighted_spherical_harmonic(0, ell,emm, theta,phi), theta)
fails.
--
-- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove color- to reply]"
on the west coast of Canada, eh?
"There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched
at any given moment. How often, or on what sys
l
> harmonics, since this is standard in quantum mechanics and this would make
> Sage agree with Wikipedia and Mathematica.
+1 on this.
> I've opened
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33117
> for this.
--
-- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove color- to reply]"
on t
ot good.
To reproduce this problem, create the following 2 files:
% head error*
==> error1.sage <==
load('error2.sage')
print bad_function(2, 3)
==> error2.sage <==
def bad_function(x,y)
"""
Note the missing ':' at the end of the first line of this
loads
all the individual files. This works fine apart from the un-helpful
error messages when (not if, *when*) I have bugs in my code. Is there
a more idiomatic way?
--
-- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove color- to reply]"
on the west coast of Canada, eh?
"There was of course no
f):
TypeError: ECL says: Memory limit reached. Please jump to an outer pointer,
quit program and enlarge the
memory limits before executing the program again.
sage: Exiting Sage (CPU time 90m12.99s, Wall time 90m16.79s).
--- end full error traceback ---
thanks, keep safe and COVID-free,
--
-- "
ess-size limit.)
[[...]]
For the archives: On further investigation it's clear I was wrong.
I was indeed hitting an OS-level process-size limit, and increasing
that limit resolved my problems. I'm sorry for the false problem
report.
--
-- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove color- to re
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:58:26PM -0700, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> The branch of the ticket https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33117 has been
> merged in Sage 9.6.beta5, so in Sage 9.6 spherical harmonics will agree
> with those of SymPy, SciPy, Mathematica and Wikipedia, and will have
larity by that
veto. However, her caution was well founded, and she saved us from
making a bad mistake. Thanks! As we reexamined the problem after
the meeting, Doug McIlroy [[found a better solution]]
--
-- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]"
currently on the west c
^{3/2}_0
= (3/2) \lfloor (3/2) \rfloor^2 - 0 \lfloor 0 \rfloor^2
= 3/2$
But it seems to me that the correct result should be
$I = \int_0^{3/2} \lfloor x \rfloor^2 \, dx$
= \int_0^1 \lfloor x \rfloor^2 \, dx
+ \int_1^{3/2} \lfloor x \rfloor^2 \, dx
= \int_0^1 0 \, dx + \int_1^{3/2} 1
/25034
is unlikely to be fixed for 9.3, should we perhaps put a note in the
documentation for 9.3 that spherical harmonics are unreliable at present?
--
-- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]"
Dept of Astronomy & IUCSS, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
cur
10 matches
Mail list logo
