[sage-devel] symbolic logic code

2008-03-03 Thread Chris Gorecki
of a good open source package for converting logical statements to conjunctive or disjunctive normal form (preferably in C[++] or python)? My implementation is effective, but I'm guessing their are heuristic methods available that can be faster. Thanks. -Chris Gorecki [EMAIL

[sage-devel] Re: symbolic logic code

2008-03-07 Thread Chris Gorecki
Wow, I had no idea that was even a possibility:) Thanks for pointing that out to me. -Chris Gorecki --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more

[sage-devel] symbolic logic code

2008-04-14 Thread Chris Gorecki
ested that would be great. -Chris Gorecki --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-

[sage-devel] symbolic logic statement equivalence

2008-07-14 Thread Chris Gorecki
a('(x&y) | z') sage: a.equivlant(b) True One way to do this would be to examine the truth tables of each for every possible mapping of the variable, but the run time would be exponential plus some. Does anyone know of a better way to implement

[sage-devel] Re: symbolic logic statement equivalence

2008-07-15 Thread Chris Gorecki
> Btw. shouldn't that be >>sage: a == b >not for *formulas*, since say also involve the syntax. Currently '==' compares parse trees. Is this the desired behavior? -Chris Gorecki --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to