Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

2024-08-12 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Le lundi 12 août 2024 à 02:45:03 UTC+2, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : I think it would be be valuable to prepare a checklist for making such updates and add it to our developer documentation. I think Eric Gourgoulhon has some Jupyter notebooks that are a good test of graphics and typesetting, some

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheels

2024-08-12 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Thursday, August 8, 2024 at 5:57:12 AM UTC-7 Marc Culler wrote: I think it would be possible to use a single spkg for all of the additional binary wheels, where the main content of that spkg is a requirements.txt file listing versions and hashes. I did initially look into using requirements

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

2024-08-12 Thread Matthias Koeppe
Thanks, Eric, for the link. I've opened https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38503 for mentioning it in our review checklist. On Monday, August 12, 2024 at 1:01:35 AM UTC-7 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > Le lundi 12 août 2024 à 02:45:03 UTC+2, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : > > > I think it would be be

[sage-devel] Re: Making the package jmol optional

2024-08-12 Thread Matthias Koeppe
PR to make jmol optional: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38504 (needs review). On Sunday, December 6, 2020 at 9:11:31 PM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > In https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30315 I propose to make jmol > optional. To my understanding it has been replaced by generally bette