This proposal makes sense to me. Something like this is necessary for us
to upgrade Jupyter since it depends on rdps-py which needs Rust to build,
and this approach preserves the other features of current standard
packages: the version is pinned (including checksums on the binary wheels)
and a
On Tuesday, August 6, 2024 at 3:30:29 PM UTC+9 seb@gmail.com wrote:
This would replace something annoying for senior developers by something
annoying for new contributors. I'm not sure if this is a good idea.
Naturally, the volume of annoyance is much larger for senior developers.
Did you
On Saturday, August 3, 2024 at 11:41:37 PM UTC-7 Niranjana K M wrote:
I could build till sagelib with the patched flint.
Now I get an error in building doc.
[spkg-install] [reference] WARNING: unsupported theme option
'source_view_link' given
I am in `develop` branch 10.5.beta1 in Gentoo linux.
It is amusing that it is put forward as a new proposal. This is my proposal I
have been making in various forms during the past 10 months or so,
mainly in context of standardisation of a couple of packages, such as pytest.
And it is put forward by a very vocal opponent of my proposal.
At the ver
It is checking and apparently rejecting it.
(assuming we talk about a regular install with
./configure && make)
More info should be in config.log
On 4 August 2024 11:30:39 BST, anon notmyfault64 wrote:
>On Saturday, August 3, 2024 at 1:33:15 AM UTC+7 Gareth Ma wrote:
>
>My `conda list`:
>htt
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 11:15:13PM -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> Currently all "standard" packages of the Sage distribution, by policy
> (https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/packaging.html; recommended
> reading),
> - either can be installed from source ("normal" packages);
> - or they
Nathan,
this is essentially the proposal I put forward in Feb 2024:
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/5kmxaw105lg/m/QGShvy6-AAAJ
You didn't like it then.
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/5kmxaw105lg/m/N-eEEQTeAgAJ
Dima
PS. Nobody seems to remember that conversation? Is it forbidde
Dima,
As I understand it, while both proposals result in binary wheels being
pulled off PyPI for certain standard packages, they differ in that:
a) The current proposal requires the version of the package to be pinned
(with checksums).
b) The current proposal does not allow a package to pull i
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 9:45 PM Nathan Dunfield wrote:
> As I understand it, while both proposals result in binary wheels being pulled
> off PyPI for certain standard packages, they differ in that:
>
> a) The current proposal requires the version of the package to be pinned
> (with checksums).
Do
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 08:28:12PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 9:03 PM Matthias Koeppe
> wrote:
> >
>
> > In https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38219 (needs review), I propose
> > the following mild policy change:
> > - as a third option, a "standard" package is al
On 8/6/24 20:42, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
On Tuesday, August 6, 2024 at 3:30:29 PM UTC+9 seb@gmail.com wrote:
This would replace something annoying for senior developers by
something annoying for new contributors. I'm not sure if this is a
good idea.
Naturally, the volume of annoyanc
On Wed, 2024-08-07 at 06:41 +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>
> In Windows, that's quite common for people to have antivirus installed.
> But for people on Linux, they usually don't install one.
>
On Linux, people aren't usually dumb enough to download exes from
strangers. Yet here we are.
--
You
12 matches
Mail list logo
