Re: [sage-devel] Re: how to benefit from spkg-configure.m4 ?

2021-10-19 Thread Thierry
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 02:01:30PM -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > There's no such make target, but a ticket to add such > targets: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31501 Thanks for the pointer. Here is another request, in the same vein towards being able to build and test most things without hum

Re: [sage-devel] Re: how to benefit from spkg-configure.m4 ?

2021-10-19 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Tuesday, October 19, 2021 at 5:59:36 AM UTC-7 Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote: > Here is another request, in the same vein > towards being able to build and test most things without human > intervention, especially in order to maintain some pressure for 32bit > systems: Are you aware

[sage-devel] How to modularize for fun and profit, IV: Testing subset distributions in virtual envs

2021-10-19 Thread Matthias Koeppe
Of course, we need *tools for testing modularized distributions* of portions of the Sage library. *1. Modularized distributions must be testable separately!* *2. But we want to keep integration testing with other portions of Sage too!* Enter "# optional", the doctest annotation that we already

[sage-devel] Re: Bug computing kernel of ring homomorphism GCA

2021-10-19 Thread Markus Wageringel
Hi Trevor, thank you for reporting this bug. This is indeed a problem, as the implementation is written only with the commutative case in mind. We should make sure that it is called in that case only. As for your proposed fix, I am afraid I am not so familiar with the non-commutative theory my