On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 7:55:12 AM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> thanks for a short example, it is helpful.
> now someone needs to dig into pynac code to understand where the memory
> leak is coming from.
>
> I've commented on the ticket -- I have a pretty good candidate for where
the l
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 9:42 AM Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 7:55:12 AM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> thanks for a short example, it is helpful.
>> now someone needs to dig into pynac code to understand where the memory leak
>> is coming from.
>>
> I've commented on t
This concerns the missing openssl for python3, which prevents the jupyter
server from starting under macOS Catalina 10.15.7.
How/where report this as a bug?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
2020-11-10 15:46:13 UTC, Murray Eisenberg:
>
> This concerns the missing openssl for python3,
> which prevents the jupyter server from starting
> under macOS Catalina 10.15.7.
>
> How/where report this as a bug?
The current licence of OpenSSL prevents us from shipping it.
OpenSSL is changing its
I can only lament about the sorry state of macOS binaries support for
9.2 on macOS 10.15.7.
I get
“python3.8” cannot be opened because the developer cannot be verified.
already in a terminal session.
What works for me, totally hassle-free, is Conda. See
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installa
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 5:12 PM Samuel Lelievre
wrote:
>
> 2020-11-10 15:46:13 UTC, Murray Eisenberg:
> >
> > This concerns the missing openssl for python3,
> > which prevents the jupyter server from starting
> > under macOS Catalina 10.15.7.
> >
> > How/where report this as a bug?
>
> The current
On Tuesday, November 10, 2020 at 9:15:26 AM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> I'd just stop recommending the use of our macOS binaries until the
> signing issue is solved.
> Use Conda.
>
>
+1.
In fact, I would suggest that we stop publishing macOS binaries until then.
--
You received t
How does one use the conda binaries instead?
> On 10 Nov2020, at 12:15 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 5:12 PM Samuel Lelievre
> mailto:samuel.lelie...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> 2020-11-10 15:46:13 UTC, Murray Eisenberg:
>>>
>>> This concerns the missing openssl for python
I get an unexpected error doing that (with conda/anaconda already installed):
# >> ERROR REPORT <<
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/anaconda3/lib/python3.8/site-packages/conda/exceptions.py",
line 1079, in __call__
return fun
Is your firewall blocking
https://conda.anaconda.org/conda-forge/noarch/_r-mutex-1.0.1-anacondar_1.tar.bz2
?
Isuru
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 1:09 PM Murray Eisenberg
wrote:
> I get an unexpected error doing that (with conda/anaconda already
> installed):
>
> # >> ERROR REPORT
Anaconda is a different serpent :-)
I don't think it was tested, no idea if it would work.
If you install miniconda, it will go to /opt/miniconda3/ - so it's a
different tree.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:09 PM Murray Eisenberg
wrote:
>
> How does one use the conda binaries instead?
>
> On 10 Nov202
I would suggest that we aim for a much shorter release cycle for Sage 9.3
with a focus on the following issues:
- macOS 11 Big Sur
- critical fixes that were not merged in 9.2
- package upgrades that did not make it into 9.2
- fixing broken optional packages
Perhaps a release date at the end of t
On Tuesday, November 10, 2020 at 2:14:29 PM UTC-8, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> I would suggest that we aim for a much shorter release cycle for Sage 9.3
> with a focus on the following issues:
> - macOS 11 Big Sur
> - critical fixes that were not merged in 9.2
> - package upgrades that did not make
Dear all,
Among the "package upgrades", I want to emphasize the one
to pari 2.13 (see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30801).
The debian freeze is happening soon and the pari ticket
is somehow blocking the SageMath update. Would make sense
to have Sage 9.3 released by then.
Le 10/11/2020 à 23:1
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020, 07:38 Vincent Delecroix, <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Among the "package upgrades", I want to emphasize the one
> to pari 2.13 (see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30801).
>
is anyone working to fix the remaining issues there?
The debian freeze is happ
Le 11/11/2020 à 08:41, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020, 07:38 Vincent Delecroix, <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Dear all,
Among the "package upgrades", I want to emphasize the one
to pari 2.13 (see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30801).
is anyone working to fix the rem
16 matches
Mail list logo
