Re: [sage-devel] Unimodular transformation matrix of LLL algorithm

2020-10-02 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 7:38 AM 'Martin R. Albrecht' via sage-devel wrote: > > Seems like the cost of doing business, the entries of U are pretty big: Could it be mostly the overhead of treating U as a part of input? After all, LLL produces a sequence of (sparse?) linear transformations applied to

[sage-devel] 9.2 beta 14

2020-10-02 Thread Thierry Dumont
On Ubuntu 20-04 after a make distclean: -compilation ok. -make ptestlong: all tests passed. t.d. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsub

[sage-devel] Re: sage -i fricas broken ?

2020-10-02 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le jeudi 1 octobre 2020 21:28:58 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit : > > Hello, > it seems that "sage -i fricas" is currently not working. > Maybe the tarball is missing on the mirrors, > or maybe the tarball name is wrong ? > Frédéric > > [fricas-1.3.6] FileNotMirroredError: tarball does not exi

Re: [sage-devel] sage -i fricas broken ?

2020-10-02 Thread Dima Pasechnik
you need to run ./configure --enable-download-from-upstream-url before doing sage -i fricas On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 8:29 PM Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > > Hello, > it seems that "sage -i fricas" is currently not working. > Maybe the tarball is missing on the mirrors, > or maybe the tarball name is

[sage-devel] Polytope triangulation fails sometimes on polytopes with non-precise vertices

2020-10-02 Thread Günter Rote
Example 1. P1=Polyhedron(backend='cdd', base_ring=RDF, vertices=[(RDF(1), -RDF(1), RDF(0)), (RDF(1), -RDF(1), RDF(1)), (RDF(1), RDF(1), RDF(1)), (RDF(1), RDF(1), -RDF(1)), (RDF(0), RDF(1), -RDF(1)), (RDF(1), RDF(0.32998), -RDF(1)), (-RDF(1), RDF(1), RDF(1)), (-RDF(1), RDF(1), -RDF(

Re: [sage-devel] Polytope triangulation fails sometimes on polytopes with non-precise vertices

2020-10-02 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Sage 8.9 is old, and cdd was updated in Sage since then. Your best bet is to upgrade Sage, and most likely these bugs will go away (e.g. this works well in Sage 9.2.beta13). Having said that, as you most probably know, a much more robust way to compute with polyhedra in Sage is to use exact ration

Re: [sage-devel] Build of 9.2beta14 failing on Ubuntu - Python 3.8.5

2020-10-02 Thread Kiran Kedlaya
Thanks. I was trying to avoid the long compilation time, but I went ahead and redid the build after doing a 'make distclean' and that fixed the issue. On Thursday, October 1, 2020 at 11:34:05 PM UTC-7 tdumont wrote: > Yes, readline has changed since a recent upgrade of Ubuntu (20-04. > make dist