We seem to be talking past each other.
Here is my experience.
My OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7.7 (Maipo)
My compiler: gcc 4.8.5 (yes, it's old!)
Here is how I built NTL:
$ ./configure SHARED=on PREFIX= /home/gid-shoupv/sw
$ make
$ make install
Then, in another directory, where I am usi
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:51 Victor Shoup, wrote:
> We seem to be talking past each other.
>
> Here is my experience.
> My OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7.7 (Maipo)
> My compiler: gcc 4.8.5 (yes, it's old!)
>
> Here is how I built NTL:
>
> $ ./configure SHARED=on PREFIX= /home/gid-shoupv/sw
> $
El jueves, 5 de septiembre de 2019, 15:51:34 (UTC+2), Victor Shoup escribió:
>
> We seem to be talking past each other.
>
Unfortunately it seems so.
It is also true that when I run ldd on libntl.so, I do not see anything
> related to pthread.
> From the comments I'm reading in https://trac.sa
Sigh.
"...a textbook case of underlinking..."
I guess I never read that textbook.
I guess I just didn't know there was a whole community of people and
projects who don't
like putting -pthread in their makefiles.
I feel like this is becoming a religious war.
If it will keep the peace, I will patch
I updated my PGFFT (Pretty Good FFT) library.
Details here: https://www.shoup.net/PGFFT/
It is now almost as fast or faster than FFTW on transforms up to 100K or so,
at least on AVX or AVX2 machines. I've posted some more timings.
If anyone is curious, the only reason I did this is that for anot
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:48 PM Victor Shoup wrote:
>
> Sigh.
> "...a textbook case of underlinking..."
> I guess I never read that textbook.
> I guess I just didn't know there was a whole community of people and projects
> who don't
> like putting -pthread in their makefiles.
>
> I feel like this
When is a linear system consistent?
This isn't helpful:
a,b,c=var('a b c')
A=matrix([[-4,5,9,a],[1, -2, 1, b],[-2,4,-2,c]])
A.echelon_form()
A.rref()
[1 0 -23/3 0]
[0 1 -13/3 0]
[0 0 0 1]
[1 0 -23/3 0]
[0 1 -13/3 0]
[0 0
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:29 PM David Guichard
wrote:
> When is a linear system consistent?
>
> This isn't helpful:
>
> a,b,c=var('a b c')
> A=matrix([[-4,5,9,a],[1, -2, 1, b],[-2,4,-2,c]])
> A.echelon_form()
> A.rref()
>
> [1 0 -23/3 0]
> [0 1 -13/3 0]
> [0 0 0
So NTL's configure script already provides a work-around.
Just pass LIBTOOL_LINKER_FLAGS=-lpthread to NTL's configure script,
and the problem goes away.
To the extent that NTL's configure interface is already a bit non-standard,
asking
package managers to do this is probably OK...at least, it's n
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 11:43 PM Victor Shoup wrote:
>
> So NTL's configure script already provides a work-around.
> Just pass LIBTOOL_LINKER_FLAGS=-lpthread to NTL's configure script,
> and the problem goes away.
No, it won'd magically go away, as one cannot blindly stick in this `-lpthread`
ther
I'm really just trying to understand what's going on.
So there is a good reason: my own education...although maybe you don't like
that reason :-)
In fact, I just tested my proposal, and it indeed doesn't work.
I am convinced that the patch is the way to go.
On Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 6:5
11 matches
Mail list logo
