Re: [sage-devel] Re: error building barvinok (sage 8.9.beta8 + system NTL)

2019-09-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:21 PM Victor Shoup wrote: > > So, I'm willing to patch libtool using your patch, as you suggest. > Just to confirm: I just replace ltmain.sh in libtool-origin with the patched > version, > and that's it. yes. > > I have another question... > I've installed NTL on Linux

Re: [sage-devel] The opportunity of Python 3 migration

2019-09-04 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:14 PM Thierry wrote: > It should also take into account some deep changes in the logic. I agree in general. But in my opinion, it's mostly independent of porting Sage to Python 3. We could do those changes now or next year, it doesn't really matter. -- You received this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: error building barvinok (sage 8.9.beta8 + system NTL)

2019-09-04 Thread Victor Shoup
Please see comments/questions below... On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 6:04:42 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:21 PM Victor Shoup > wrote: > > > > > When I compile a program that uses NTL, I always pass -pthread to g++. > > Doesn't that automatically cause the n

Re: [sage-devel] Re: error building barvinok (sage 8.9.beta8 + system NTL)

2019-09-04 Thread Antonio Rojas
El jueves, 5 de septiembre de 2019, 6:07:13 (UTC+2), Victor Shoup escribió: > So, based on that comment, it seems that there is no problem if you link > with g++ > rather than libtool. But who or what uses libtool to link? > I would never have thought of doing that, as I thought libtool was

Re: [sage-devel] Re: error building barvinok (sage 8.9.beta8 + system NTL)

2019-09-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 05:07, Victor Shoup wrote: > Please see comments/questions below... > > On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 6:04:42 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:21 PM Victor Shoup wrote: >> > >> >> > When I compile a program that uses NTL, I always pass -pt