Hello,
Here is the latest branch and the last commit was by David Lucas.
https://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/diff?id=32feb35840fab0ebd5a8957aed78d4c05d7e751c
The errors (there's numerous instances of each of these errors occurring.
Please find below one of each type):
(1)
sage: R. = QQ[]
sage: s
Hello,
I got the same error yesterday after commenting (and Cc'ing some people) on
#20908.
I don't know how to replicate this error though...
I worked on several tickets yesterday and only got this error with #20908.
David
Le vendredi 1 juillet 2016 05:48:37 UTC+2, Paul Masson a écrit :
>
> Jus
I've updated #18889, and did not get any errors (changed the type from task
to enhancement too...)
On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 4:48:37 AM UTC+1, Paul Masson wrote:
>
> Just got this error when saving changes to #18889:
>
> closeWarning: The change has been saved, but an error occurred while
> sen
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Viviane Pons wrote:
I'm with two new sage git users: eviatarbach and avenrias and they seem to
have a similar problem. They have put their ssh key on trac (I've checked),
but it keeps saying "Permission denied (publickey)" when they try
I got the same error.
(Not that it
Weird. I'll look in the Trac log and see if there's any more info on that.
"expected string or buffer" is a Python error that occurs when trying to
call str() on something that isn't string-like. Probably a bug in Trac (or
possibly the account manager plugin). There will probably be a full
traceba
Installing on yet another computer today. Same basic deal: everything
builds except dochtml. This time I did check the logs before running ./sage
-i jmol, and can confirm that no file with a name of the form
$SAGE_ROOT/logs/pkgs/jmol-*.log
was written on the initial build.
On Sunday, June 26
Are you having the same problem as me:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/WERLdTKfAho
For instance, do you have sympy installed? (if you don't, "./sage -t
src/sage/arith.py" will fail immediately due to uninstalled sympy).
Do you have Cremona's mini-database installed? Test by ru
Hi,
I've now recompiled Sage after rolling back llvm-libs to 3.7.1-1 (was
3.8.0.1). That fixed the GLIBCXX errors spewing out of ar and ranlib, but
it didn't fix the problem: my newly compiled version of Sage is still born
without most of the default spkgs, including sympy, jmol, palp,
cremona
Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've now recompiled Sage after rolling back llvm-libs to 3.7.1-1 (was
> 3.8.0.1). That fixed the GLIBCXX errors spewing out of ar and ranlib,
> but it didn't fix the problem: my newly compiled version of Sage is
> still born without most of the default spkgs, i
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:14 PM, leif wrote:
>>> Erik Bray wrote:
While we're tinkering with the workflow, I think we need to change the
workflow associated with testing change
> $ make --version
GNU Make 4.2.1
Built for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> Did you build in parallel, and if so, does probably building
> sequentially fix the problem (such that the missing packages then get
> built)?
I just did "make"; the default is still sequential build, right? I have
no suspect envir
Johan S. H. Rosenkilde wrote:
>> $ make --version
> GNU Make 4.2.1
> Built for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
>
>> Did you build in parallel, and if so, does probably building
>> sequentially fix the problem (such that the missing packages then get
>> built)?
>
> I just did "make"; the default is still sequ
> Except for the Sage library (and probably docbuilding, not sure), yes.
> If you explicitly use 'make -j1', then also the Sage library will be
> built sequentially, still using Python's multi-processing though, as
> does docbuilding.
I've done `make distclean && make -j1`. Let's see how that one
Hi,
I just noticed, in the very beginning when doing "make" after distclean,
the build process prints a list of packages:
checking package versions...
4ti2-1.6.7
alabaster-0.7.8
arb-2.8.1.p0
...
This list *does* contain the uninstalled packages:
database_cremona_ellcurve-20
It is now working for me! Not sure what happened.
Eviatar
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 23:34:49 UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> perhaps adding an invalid ssh key still breaks the communication between
> git server and trac...
> Can they still push changes to the git server?
>
> On Friday, July 1,
Hey Aprit,
The errors (there's numerous instances of each of these errors occurring.
> Please find below one of each type):
> (1)
> sage: R. = QQ[]
> sage: sigma = R.hom([t+1])
> sage: S. = R['x', sigma]
> sage: S.twist_map(-1)
>
>
>
> *Got - TypeError: bad operand type for unary ~:
> 'sage.rin
On Fri, 1 Jul 2016, Erik Bray wrote:
One thing that will help, which has already been discussed up-thread,
is having Trac help take care of the little nitty-gritty checks on
tickets.
True. It feels extremely stupid to get a message "You forgot reviewer's
name.", as this is exactly what comput
Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2016, Erik Bray wrote:
>
>> One thing that will help, which has already been discussed up-thread,
>> is having Trac help take care of the little nitty-gritty checks on
>> tickets.
>
> True. It feels extremely stupid to get a message "You forgot reviewer's
> n
On Fri, 1 Jul 2016, leif wrote:
True. It feels extremely stupid to get a message "You forgot reviewer's
name.", as this is exactly what computers should do instead of humans.
You cannot automatically add these names; all we could do is create some
plug-in such that when a ticket is set to "pos
The following article cites both Sage and Mathbook XML a fair amount. And
is definitely worth the read, persuasive but also realistic about open
texts.(One of the authors has written a Sage lab manual for his book.)
Rob, probably a link on the MBX site would not be amiss.
The Mathematical
>
>
> I think Jeroen *did* automate the posts regarding empty author and/or
> reviewer fields when he was release manager. :-)
>
I'm pretty sure that Volker automates this too...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe
https://moscow.sci-hub.cc/12ca465033b407001af9d921b2c7f5fa/hefferon2016.pdf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 10:00:34 AM UTC+2, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> The giac and giacpy packages are now one year optional (#12375). Since
> pynac-0.6.6 (#20742) has optional support for giac, and uses it to fix a
> bug,
> as well as a much faster GCD, I'm proposing to make the giac/giacpy
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
