On 25 Oct 2014 05:07, "William Stein" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
> > And here's a public worksheet:
> >
https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/49a2531d-9d02-42c9-9db6-f9551fbfa59e/files/2014-10-24-212837.sagews
> >
> > (Thanks, William, for making public worksh
On 10/25/14, 0:07, William Stein wrote:
They are fun aren't they -- no login required.
It seems that often, though, the login page or the project settings page
flashes up for a second or less, which is confusing. Do you know why
the signup page or settings page might come up first, then be r
A fairly bogus article for AMS.
First of all, reporting a bug in the calculation of determinant in
Mathematica does not require several pages.
Secondly, if an algorithm for a problem has a flaw, and the same algorithm
is used in 2 CAS, it doesn't
support anything that the answers are the same.
On Saturday, October 25, 2014 6:44:06 PM UTC+1, rjf wrote:
>
> Indeed, bugs can be (dare I say-- are) introduced by allowing
> random people to modify code.
>
Flamebait or just hilariously wrong misconception of open source?
In any case, the real WTF of the article (besides the low information
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 10/25/14, 0:07, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> They are fun aren't they -- no login required.
>
>
> It seems that often, though, the login page or the project settings page
> flashes up for a second or less, which is confusing. Do you know why
On 2014-10-25, Volker Braun wrote:
> --=_Part_265_1870362412.1414262432518
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Saturday, October 25, 2014 6:44:06 PM UTC+1, rjf wrote:
>>
>> Indeed, bugs can be (dare I say-- are) introduced by allowing
>> random people to modify code.
>>
>
> Flame
On 25 Oct 2014 01:55, "Jason Grout" wrote:
>
> The AMS Notices has a column about using computers to do math, dwelling
on some problems they had with Mathematica:
>
> http://www.ams.org/notices/201410/rnoti-p1249.pdf
Somewhat related I see an example last week of where I think the use of
compute
On 25 Oct 2014 19:40, "Volker Braun" wrote:
> In any case, the real WTF of the article (besides the low information
density) is that Wolfram sat on the bug report for >1 year and did nothing
about it.
There must be tons of Sage bugs reported which don't get fixed. You can
argue about the serious
On Friday, October 24, 2014 6:39:45 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> I have a working Sage on OSX 10.10. I suggest to release that shortly, in
> case anybody else made the mistake of upgrading soon after the initial
> Yosemite release ;-) Please review
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/query?statu
See also what I wrote in http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17204#comment:7
I had already reported the flint one a while ago. Git works for me. I have
already made tickets for gsl and m4rie.
On Saturday, October 25, 2014 11:26:43 PM UTC+1, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, October 24, 201
In the case of iml, the upgrade to 1.0.4 should solve the failing test problem.
In 1.0.3 and under there was always something that was bound to fail on OS X.
At least that’s how I remember it.
Not sure when I will give the whole thing a spin. I do not see a window of
opportunity
before Wednesday
On 10/25/14, 15:04, William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
On 10/25/14, 0:07, William Stein wrote:
They are fun aren't they -- no login required.
It seems that often, though, the login page or the project settings page
flashes up for a second or less, whic
On Oct 25, 2014 5:53 PM, "Jason Grout" wrote:
>
> On 10/25/14, 15:04, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/25/14, 0:07, William Stein wrote:
They are fun aren't they -- no login required.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It seems that often
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:34 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Oct 25, 2014 5:53 PM, "Jason Grout" wrote:
>>
>> On 10/25/14, 15:04, William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Jason Grout
>>> wrote:
On 10/25/14, 0:07, William Stein wrote:
>
>
> They are fun
On 2014-10-24, Jakob Kroeker wrote:
> I'm doing this: since in the recent project I ran into many bugs in a
> well-known CAS, and now I do not trust any function I use and started
> to look actively for bugs (testing and code reviewing) and discovered
> about 100 bugs during the last year.
> So
On 2014-10-25, William Stein wrote:
> They are fun aren't they -- no login required. Here's one
> illustrating two of the integrals in that article that Mathematica
> gets wrong -- it has some 2d and 3d plots (!):
Is there a tl;dr somewhere which says what is the problem that Mma got
wrong? an
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Robert Dodier wrote:
> On 2014-10-24, Jakob Kroeker wrote:
>
>> I'm doing this: since in the recent project I ran into many bugs in a
>> well-known CAS, and now I do not trust any function I use and started
>> to look actively for bugs (testing and code reviewing)
On Saturday, October 25, 2014 7:35:06 PM UTC-7, Robert Dodier wrote:
>
> Is there a tl;dr somewhere which says what is the problem that Mma got
> wrong? and I gather there is an incorrect integral too?
>
Here's an integral maxima gets wrong with abs_integrate loaded:
integrate(integrate(abs(e
18 matches
Mail list logo
