"git trac config" sets up the trac remote, among other things. Its also the
second command in the docs.
Its unfortunate that you can't use Sage's git for http/https (unless you
had the soft dependencies at build time), but then its very unlikely to not
use the system git for the initial checko
leif wrote:
Elliot Findley wrote:
Hello. I tried to build sage-6.1.1 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. My laptop is an
Asus Ux31A notebook.
Note that Sage 6.2 has been released a couple of weeks ago (although
that presumably won't fix this particular issue).
Or it probably will. (Sage 6.2 includes the f
leif wrote:
leif wrote:
Elliot Findley wrote:
Hello. I tried to build sage-6.1.1 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. My laptop is an
Asus Ux31A notebook.
Note that Sage 6.2 has been released a couple of weeks ago (although
that presumably won't fix this particular issue).
Or it probably will. (Sage 6.2 i
This is a RFC for new packaging system for "sage-the-distribution". I've
already talked about this with a few of you at the last sage days, but
finally it managed to do something about it. The goal is to be:
* Git-aware: use SHA1 hashes instead of timestamps for dependency
calculations
* Unifie
Hi,
Le 15/06/2014 22:59, Volker Braun a écrit :
This is a RFC for new packaging system for "sage-the-distribution". I've
already talked about this with a few of you at the last sage days, but
finally it managed to do something about it. The goal is to be:
* Git-aware: use SHA1 hashes instead of
On Sunday, June 15, 2014 10:14:59 PM UTC+1, Snark wrote:
>
> (1) what is the relation between your work and Felix Salfelder's
None.
> which still hasn't been fully included as far as I know?
>
Because it doesn't work. There is always trac if you want to know the
details.
(2) does it allow
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:40:13 Volker Braun wrote:
> On Sunday, June 15, 2014 10:14:59 PM UTC+1, Snark wrote:
> > (1) what is the relation between your work and Felix Salfelder's
>
> None.
>
No surprise if a bit sad.
> > which still hasn't been fully included as far as I know?
>
> Because it doe
On Sunday, June 15, 2014 10:42:55 PM UTC+1, François wrote:
> So I guess you don't record files installed. Is it at least feasible?
>
Its definitely something that I want. But in the interest of keeping
manageable milestones I'm not going to change the spgk-install scripts for
now. Recording t
Volker Braun wrote:
This is a RFC for new packaging system for "sage-the-distribution". I've
already talked about this with a few of you at the last sage days, but
finally it managed to do something about it. The goal is to be:
* Git-aware: use SHA1 hashes instead of timestamps for dependency
ca
On Sunday, June 15, 2014 10:59:57 PM UTC+1, leif wrote:
>
> > * Git-aware: use SHA1 hashes instead of timestamps for dependency
> > calculations
>
> ? Hashs of what exactly? Modification / installation time of course
> matters...
>
No, modification times precisely does not matter. Git does n
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 15:29:58 Volker Braun wrote:
> On Sunday, June 15, 2014 10:59:57 PM UTC+1, leif wrote:
> > > * Git-aware: use SHA1 hashes instead of timestamps for dependency
> > > calculations
> >
> > ? Hashs of what exactly? Modification / installation time of course
> > matters...
>
> No
So how about naming them compile/hard/soft/test, is that clearer?
I don't think we need separate (only) run-time dependencies...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, se
HI Volker,
If you haven't already looked at it, you might be interested in the
hashdist project: https://github.com/hashdist/hashdist. I've included a
few more comments below. I will be at sage days this week.
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> This is a RFC for new pack
13 matches
Mail list logo
