On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:15:57 -0800
Benjamin Jones wrote:
> > It's hard to tell from the implementation if this behavior is
> > intentional, unintentional, or a bug. The implementation is just
> > that multiplication maps over relational operators like ==, <, <=,
> > etc. But I think it's not poss
Could somebody please review this optional package? I think it's a
useful improvement over the old autotools spkg.
On 2012-10-03 21:27, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I have made a lot of fixes to my autotools spkg, essentially improving
> it from a "proof of concept" to a "real" spkg. For this reason,
Hi all,
There seems to be an inconsistency between the docstrings and the actual
behavior of some module-related methods. For instance, I am surprised by the
behavior of the coordinates() method :
sage: A = ZZ^3
sage: A.coordinates?
…
Definition: A.coordinates(self, v, check=True)
Docstrin
The Cygwin port is being resurrected, and there is good work afoot. What
we now need is (among other things) an update to the prereq spkg so that we
can think about closing #6743.
We need to somehow check for the following things on Cygwin:
* `file`
* `patch`
* `liblapack`, `liblapack0`, `
On 12/19/2012 12:28 AM, Charles Bouillaguet wrote:
Hi all,
There seems to be an inconsistency between the docstrings and the actual
behavior of some module-related methods. For instance, I am surprised by the
behavior of the coordinates() method :
sage: A = ZZ^3
sage: A.coordinates?
…
Definit
See
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/2079/a-place-to-advertise-sage?answer=2986#2986
Feel free to comment if you like it!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsu
