[sage-devel] Created "plotting" component on Trac

2012-04-19 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
I created a new component "plotting" on Trac. If anybody would like to become owner of such tickets (meaning you will get all emails from tickets with this component), let me know. Currently, there is no owner. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscrib

[sage-devel] Re: Created "plotting" component on Trac

2012-04-19 Thread Jason Grout
On 4/19/12 2:18 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: I created a new component "plotting" on Trac. If anybody would like to become owner of such tickets (meaning you will get all emails from tickets with this component), let me know. Currently, there is no owner. How is this different than the graphics

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Created "plotting" component on Trac

2012-04-19 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-04-19 09:30, Jason Grout wrote: > On 4/19/12 2:18 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> I created a new component "plotting" on Trac. If anybody would like to >> become owner of such tickets (meaning you will get all emails from >> tickets with this component), let me know. Currently, there is no

[sage-devel] Re: Created "plotting" component on Trac

2012-04-19 Thread Jason Grout
On 4/19/12 3:39 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2012-04-19 09:30, Jason Grout wrote: On 4/19/12 2:18 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: I created a new component "plotting" on Trac. If anybody would like to become owner of such tickets (meaning you will get all emails from tickets with this component), le

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Created "plotting" component on Trac

2012-04-19 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-04-19 11:40, Jason Grout wrote: > On 4/19/12 3:39 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> On 2012-04-19 09:30, Jason Grout wrote: >>> On 4/19/12 2:18 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: I created a new component "plotting" on Trac. If anybody would like to become owner of such tickets (meaning you wi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Created "plotting" component on Trac

2012-04-19 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Also removed components: * debian_package * dsage (0 tickets) * msvc (0 tickets) * sage-mode (0 tickets) Then there are a few very specific components like "fractals" which have tickets but should probably be removed also and be recategorized in a different component. -- To post to this group, s

[sage-devel] #12849 (Sphinx HTML argspec) needs review

2012-04-19 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi, > > Forget about the critical ones. Here are the ones listed as blockers: > > > > #12849 The argspecs is broken in the Sphinx documentation > > > > [...] > > I put it myself as a blocker, since it impairs a large part of Sage > HTML doc. I'm currently investigating on

[sage-devel] bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread Rajeev Singh
Hi, I get the following error while trying to install git from sage-optional packages. The error seems to be in one of the python library files (os.py) and is a syntax error - File "/compute/imsc9/rajeev/bin/sage-4.8/local/lib/python/os.py", line 758 bs = b"" ^ SyntaxError: invali

[sage-devel] Split plot.py in two (#12857) needs review

2012-04-19 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Please review blocker ticket #12857: it splits the file sage/plot/plot.py in two files: graphics.py containing the Graphics and GraphicsArray classes, plot.py containing the actual plot() commands. This split was needed because doctesting plot.py took much longer than any other file and doctest ti

[sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread Simon King
On 2012-04-19, Rajeev Singh wrote: > Hi, > > I get the following error while trying to install git from > sage-optional packages. The error seems to be in one of the python > library files (os.py) and is a syntax error - > > File "/compute/imsc9/rajeev/bin/sage-4.8/local/lib/python/os.py", line 7

[sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread Volker Braun
The b"" is a string with the Python 3 byte-prefix. In Python 2, version 2.6+ this is a noop for Python 3 compatibility. In Python versions older than 2.6, this is an error. Conclusion: You are running an old Python interpreter, in particular not the one that is part of Sage. Hence it breaks.

[sage-devel] Re: Created "plotting" component on Trac

2012-04-19 Thread kcrisman
On Apr 19, 5:40 am, Jason Grout wrote: > On 4/19/12 3:39 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > > On 2012-04-19 09:30, Jason Grout wrote: > >> On 4/19/12 2:18 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > >>> I created a new component "plotting" on Trac.  If anybody would like to > >>> become owner of such tickets (meanin

[sage-devel] Re: Created "plotting" component on Trac

2012-04-19 Thread leif
On 19 Apr., 12:09, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Also removed components: > * debian_package > * dsage (0 tickets) > * msvc (0 tickets) > * sage-mode (0 tickets) > > Then there are a few very specific components like "fractals" which have > tickets but should probably be removed also and be recategorize

[sage-devel] Re: Created "plotting" component on Trac

2012-04-19 Thread leif
On 19 Apr., 20:59, kcrisman wrote: > On Apr 19, 5:40 am, Jason Grout wrote: > > On 4/19/12 3:39 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > > On 2012-04-19 09:30, Jason Grout wrote: > > >> On 4/19/12 2:18 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > >>> I created a new component "plotting" on Trac.  If anybody would like to

[sage-devel] Re: sympow bug

2012-04-19 Thread leif
On 19 Apr., 05:33, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > I think I have found the problem with sympow.  It is nothing to do with > elliptic curves.  It is simply a malloc/free error. > > In util.c there is a function free_data, which frees TACKS[0].  TACKS[0] > is meant to be allocated in disk.c, but

[sage-devel] Re: Call for Papers: Symbolic computation with Sage in mathematical education and research

2012-04-19 Thread kcrisman
Given that it claims to be about both research and education usage, I'm forwarding this to the other relevant Google groups. Nice find! On Thursday, April 19, 2012 2:11:19 PM UTC-4, LFS wrote: > > Hopefully doing this correctly since not exactly a "question". Just wanted > to make sure this gro

[sage-devel] Re: Including pari and znpoly in the same file

2012-04-19 Thread leif
On 17 Apr., 23:30, David Roe wrote: > Patching zn_poly in Sage sounds good to me I could include such a patch into the zn_poly spkg at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12433 -leif > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 17:25, François Bissey > wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:56:52 David R

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Created "plotting" component on Trac

2012-04-19 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-04-19 21:05, leif wrote: > Can you rename the porting "subcomponents" as suggested? No, but maybe somebody who knows more about Trac can. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googleg

[sage-devel] Re: Including pari and znpoly in the same file

2012-04-19 Thread leif
On 18 Apr., 00:44, Bill Hart wrote: > At the present moment flint 2.3 does not use zn_poly. zn_poly's 'configure' has some '--use-flint' option, but we currently don't use that either. -leif > We may be incorporating some code from zn_poly in flint 2.3 in the > future, but will not need to hav

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Including pari and znpoly in the same file

2012-04-19 Thread David Roe
That would be great. David On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 13:27, leif wrote: > On 17 Apr., 23:30, David Roe wrote: > > Patching zn_poly in Sage sounds good to me > > I could include such a patch into the zn_poly spkg at > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12433 > > > -leif > > > On Tue,

[sage-devel] Re: Created "plotting" component on Trac

2012-04-19 Thread leif
On 19 Apr., 22:34, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2012-04-19 21:05, leif wrote: > Can you rename the porting "subcomponents" as suggested? > > No, but maybe somebody who knows more about Trac can. Not me. Haven't even tried, but presumably needs some SQL statement to change the fields of all tickets

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Created "plotting" component on Trac

2012-04-19 Thread David Roe
I can probably do it, if we decide on a list of changes we want to make. David On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 13:44, leif wrote: > On 19 Apr., 22:34, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2012-04-19 21:05, leif wrote: > > Can you rename the porting "subcomponents" as suggested? > > > > No, but maybe somebody w

[sage-devel] Bug in base_ring?

2012-04-19 Thread Andrew Mathas
The following snippet appears to exhibit a minor bug in base_ring: sage: F.=FiniteField(5^6) sage: z.base_ring() Finite Field of size 5 sage: a.parent() Finite Field in z of size 5^6 According to the documentation, base_ring() "Returns the base ring of this element's parent (if that makes sense)

Re: [sage-devel] Bug in base_ring?

2012-04-19 Thread Alex Ghitza
Hi, On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Andrew Mathas wrote: > The following snippet appears to exhibit a minor bug in base_ring: > > sage: F.=FiniteField(5^6) > sage: z.base_ring() > Finite Field of size 5 > sage: a.parent() > Finite Field in z of size 5^6 > > According to the documentation, base_r

Re: [sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread Rajeev Singh
I don't think that should happen because I'm just giving the following command on terminal - sage -i git-1.7.9.4 I am using sage-4.8. I get the same error on two computers (one running SuseLinux and another running Debian). Rajeev On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > The b"

Re: [sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:25:15 PM UTC-7, Rajeev wrote: > > I don't think that should happen because I'm just giving the following > command on terminal - > > sage -i git-1.7.9.4 > > I am using sage-4.8. I get the same error on two computers (one > running SuseLinux and another running Debian

[sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread leif
On 20 Apr., 05:25, Rajeev Singh wrote: > I don't think that should happen because I'm just giving the following > command on terminal - > > sage -i git-1.7.9.4 > > I am using sage-4.8. I get the same error on two computers (one > running SuseLinux and another running Debian). What does $ sage --

[sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:23:47 PM UTC-7, leif wrote: > > On 20 Apr., 05:25, Rajeev Singh wrote: > > I don't think that should happen because I'm just giving the following > > command on terminal - > > > > sage -i git-1.7.9.4 > > > > I am using sage-4.8. I get the same error on two com

[sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread leif
On 20 Apr., 06:23, leif wrote: > On 20 Apr., 05:25, Rajeev Singh wrote: > > > I don't think that should happen because I'm just giving the following > > command on terminal - > > > sage -i git-1.7.9.4 P.S.: You should try the git-1.7.9.4.p1.spkg -leif -- To post to this group, send an emai

[sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread leif
On 20 Apr., 06:27, John H Palmieri wrote: > On Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:23:47 PM UTC-7, leif wrote: > > > On 20 Apr., 05:25, Rajeev Singh wrote: > > > I don't think that should happen because I'm just giving the following > > > command on terminal - > > > > sage -i git-1.7.9.4 > > > > I am usin

[sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread Keshav Kini
That is here: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12707 On Friday, April 20, 2012 12:31:04 PM UTC+8, leif wrote: > > > > On 20 Apr., 06:23, leif wrote: > > On 20 Apr., 05:25, Rajeev Singh wrote: > > > > > I don't think that should happen because I'm just giving the following > > > comm

Re: [sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread Keshav Kini
Hmm... keshav@sage ~ $ mkdir bin keshav@sage ~ $ cat - > bin/python #!/bin/sh echo "You are likely to be eaten by a grue" keshav@sage ~ $ chmod a+x bin/python keshav@sage ~ $ export PATH="/home/keshav/bin:$PATH" keshav@sage ~ $ ./sage/sage -i ./git-1.7.9.4.p1.spkg | grep grue keshav@sage ~ $ So

[sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread leif
On 20 Apr., 06:35, leif wrote: > On 20 Apr., 06:27, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:23:47 PM UTC-7, leif wrote: > > > > On 20 Apr., 05:25, Rajeev Singh wrote: > > > > I don't think that should happen because I'm just giving the following > > > > comma

Re: [sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread Keshav Kini
Uh... I'm not sure why Google Groups just quoted John's message five times, but sorry about that... -Keshav -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit th

[sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread leif
On 20 Apr., 06:49, Keshav Kini wrote: > Uh... I'm not sure why Google Groups just quoted John's message five times, > but sorry about that... In this case not that bad, as I completely missed his original post. >8) I'm pretty sure Google swallowed it for me in the first place (old web interface

Re: [sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread Keshav Kini
D'oh: keshav@sage ~ $ grep -r '/python' git-1.7.9.4.p1 git-1.7.9.4.p1/src/Makefile:PYTHON_PATH = /usr/bin/python git-1.7.9.4.p1/src/Makefile:PYTHON_PATH = /usr/local/bin/python git-1.7.9.4.p1/src/git_remote_helpers/Makefile:PYTHON_PATH = /usr/local/bin/python git-1.7.9.4.p1/src/gi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread Keshav Kini
Er, not patch the makefile, but actually just exporting some environment variables should be sufficient. -Keshav -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, vis

[sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread leif
On 20 Apr., 06:48, leif wrote: > On 20 Apr., 06:35, leif wrote: > > On 20 Apr., 06:27, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > On Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:23:47 PM UTC-7, leif wrote: > > > > On 20 Apr., 05:25, Rajeev Singh wrote: > > > > > I don't think that should happen because I'm just giving the fol

[sage-devel] Re: bug in os.py

2012-04-19 Thread Keshav Kini
OK, a new SPKG is up in my homedir on boxen. Once ticket #12707 is accepted, the SPKG will be on the official server, and one should be able to install it with `sage -i git`, but for now, please test with $ cd /tmp $ wget http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/keshav/files/git-1.7.10.spkg $ sage -

[sage-devel] Re: Bug in base_ring?

2012-04-19 Thread Keshav Kini
Alex Ghitza writes: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Andrew Mathas > wrote: >> The following snippet appears to exhibit a minor bug in base_ring: >> >> sage: F.=FiniteField(5^6) >> sage: z.base_ring() >> Finite Field of size 5 >> sage: a.parent() >> Finite Field in z of size 5^6 >> >> Accordin