[sage-devel] Re: Base ring(s) for free module morphisms

2011-06-30 Thread Francis Clarke
On Jun 30, 2:26 am, Rob Beezer wrote: > sage: V = GF(3)^3 > sage: W = QQ^2 > sage: H = Hom(V, W) > sage: m = matrix(3, 2, range(6)) > sage: f = H(m) This makes no sense at all; the function is not a homomorphism: sage: v = [V.random_element() for i in range(2)] sage: l = [GF(3).random_element

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Compile Error on LMDE x64

2011-06-30 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Jun 29, 7:39 pm, Roman Sinayev wrote: > Ok, I changed the PATH (removed /local/ stuff) and it didn't help.  I > think i have the local folder as a part of the default PATH on my > ubuntu notebook as well. > > Which log would I look at in the build directory? python-2.6.4.p11/src/config.log l

[sage-devel] Conférence PyCONFR 2011

2011-06-30 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Bonjour, Pour information: Conférence PyCONFR 2011 17 et 18 Septembre 2011 Rennes, France Rendez-vous annuel des utilisateurs de Python organisé par l'Association Francophone Python http://www.pycon.fr/conference/edition2011 Quelqu'un ser

[sage-devel] Re: Call for vote: lrcalc as standard or optional spkg?

2011-06-30 Thread Nils Bruin
On Jun 29, 3:49 pm, Florent Hivert wrote: >       Hi David, > > > I thought it had been agreed no package would be standard unless it > > is first optional. > > There were indeed such an agreement. However, I'd rather following the idea of > the rule rather than the letter. [...] > I don't see the

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Compile Error on LMDE x64

2011-06-30 Thread Roman Sinayev
The log is here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6726175/config.log On Jun 30, 4:26 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Jun 29, 7:39 pm, Roman Sinayev wrote: > > > Ok, I changed the PATH (removed /local/ stuff) and it didn't help.  I > > think i have the local folder as a part of the default PATH on my > > u

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Call for vote: lrcalc as standard or optional spkg?

2011-06-30 Thread Francois Bissey
> On Jun 29, 3:49 pm, Florent Hivert > > wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > > I thought it had been agreed no package would be standard unless it > > > is first optional. > > > > There were indeed such an agreement. However, I'd rather following the > > idea of the rule rather than the letter.

Re: [sage-devel] Conférence PyCONFR 2011

2011-06-30 Thread slelievre
Le 30 juin 2011 09:48, Nicolas M. Thiery a écrit : >        Bonjour, > > Pour information: > >        Conférence PyCONFR 2011 >        17 et 18 Septembre 2011 >        Rennes, France > >        Rendez-vous annuel des utilisateurs de Python organisé par >        l'Association Francophone Python > >

[sage-devel] Re: Base ring(s) for free module morphisms

2011-06-30 Thread Rob Beezer
On Jun 30, 1:05 am, Francis Clarke wrote: Thanks, Francis. Very astute. > This makes no sense at all; the function is not a homomorphism: Right. So K^2 is a 4-dimensional vector space over the rationals. But you've represented f with a 2 x 2 matrix. Despite f above acting as a homomor