[sage-devel] Re: Should cached_method be documented in the reference manual?

2011-01-10 Thread Simon King
On 10 Jan., 08:56, Simon King wrote: > IMO, it obviously should be added. But where in the TOC tree should it > be inserted? Perhaps under "Basic Structures", right between "Unique > Representation" and "Dynamic classes"? Or better under "Miscellaneous", right after "Abstract method"? -- To pos

[sage-devel] Re: can sage binaries be stripped (made smaller)

2011-01-10 Thread emil
sagelive-511-46-r3.iso released I have build the Live CD distribution in the conventional way, iso size is 630 MB (note: OS with applications, complete Sage with jsmathfonts, Java and working R plotting) release announcement is here http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread

[sage-devel] Tickets #8537, #8538 and #10566 for outdated spkgs openmpi, mpi4py and it's docu would need some review

2011-01-10 Thread maldun
Hi all! I needed them for a seminar project, so I updated the openmpi (see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8537) mpi4py (see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8538) packages and the mpi4py docu (see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10566). The packages worked on ubuntu

[sage-devel] Re: Community thanks

2011-01-10 Thread Niles
I just wanted to add my voice of *thanks!* to everyone involved with the booth. I enjoyed the chance to meet some other sage folks and talk to some new people about sage. And I love my sage sticker ;) thanks everyone, Niles -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com

[sage-devel] Re: Community thanks

2011-01-10 Thread kcrisman
Yes, the booth was great. Even during the slowest periods of the exhibit areas, there was often at least one person stopping by. At peak times we'd have as many as four people, each talking to a different 'regular'. A lot of people mentioning wanting to consider switching (as opposed to not hav

[sage-devel] Re: can sage binaries be stripped (made smaller)

2011-01-10 Thread Harald Schilly
On Thursday, January 6, 2011 8:59:32 PM UTC+1, emil wrote: > > > contain lots of identical files > Here is a line for bash that shows you identical files: find . -type f -exec md5sum {} \; | sort --key=1,32 | uniq -w 32 -d --all-repeated=separate H -- To post to this group, send an email

[sage-devel] Re: can sage binaries be stripped (made smaller)

2011-01-10 Thread Volker Braun
you can use fslint to identify duplicate files and merge them (i.e. hardlink them to a single file). [vbr...@volker-two ~]$ /usr/share/fslint/fslint/findup --help find dUPlicate files. Usage: findup [[[-t [-m|-d]] | [--summary]] [-r] [-f] paths(s) ...] If no path(s) specified then the currrent d

[sage-devel] Re: .py versus .spyx

2011-01-10 Thread G Hahn
Thanks! It worked... On 7 Jan., 06:01, William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:03 PM, G Hahn wrote: > > Thanks for your help! > > When you add a .pyxfile, you will also have to edit > SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/module_list.py to get "sage -b" to recognize it. > Look at the examples in that fi

[sage-devel] Re: help needed with coercion model, actions, and _lmul_

2011-01-10 Thread koffie
Ok I finally found the error. I should have used cpdef for the _lmul_ function. Now sparse*scalar multiplication runtime is finally no longer depending on the matrix size, only on the number of nonzero enties. It's ready for review at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10568 BTW. If you rea

[sage-devel] Re: Community thanks

2011-01-10 Thread BFJ
The booth was great, and the stickers were a perfect conversation starter. Thanks Marshall and Jason and Dan and everyone else I saw manning the booth. -- Benjamin Jones jone...@uwstout.edu On Jan 10, 8:32 am, kcrisman wrote: > Yes, the booth was great.  Even during the slowest periods of the >