tl;dr old curmudgeon flaming on about the dead past, not "getting it"
about Sage.
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
In terms of the general rant, there are two points I'd like to make.
The first is that there's a distinction between the Sage library
itself and the many other spkgs we ship. By far the ma
On 08/29/10 07:07 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
There have been many reports of where doctests fail when running
make ptest
or
make ptestlong
which later pass if run individually. I've lost count of the number of times
I've seen that reported,
Hello,
I'm working on arithmetic subgroup in sage.modular.arithgroup
especially on arithgroup_perm, and I do not know what does the method
__cmp__ must do (it is not specified in sage.groups.group.Group where
I guess it is the right place):
* equality and inclusions? In this case, the given imp
On 27 srp, 18:49, Ryan Hinton wrote:
> I split these problems into three tickets, now trac #9823, #9824, and
> #9825. My knowledge and need are not great enough for me to dig into
> these at the moment, but at least they are in the system now. :-)
>
> - Ryan
Thanks for making the report.
I su
Hi,
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:02:05 -0700 (PDT), Vincent D <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm working on arithmetic subgroup in sage.modular.arithgroup
> especially on arithgroup_perm, and I do not know what does the method
> __cmp__ must do (it is not specified in sage.groups.group.Group whe
On 08/29/10 09:56 AM, Tim Daly wrote:
tl;dr old curmudgeon flaming on about the dead past, not "getting it"
about Sage.
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
In terms of the general rant, there are two points I'd like to make.
The first is that there's a distinction between the Sage library
itself and the m
Why is this entire thread not on sage-flame? What does software
engineering, documentation, test code, etc. have to do with "Creating
a viable free open source alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica and
Matlab."?
I found the entire thread really amusing. I would parody the hell out
of it, but th
Bill Hart wrote:
Why is this entire thread not on sage-flame? What does software
engineering, documentation, test code, etc. have to do with "Creating
a viable free open source alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica and
Matlab."?
Despite what appears to be competitive badgering I really do
This is a split off from the thread "Random banter about Sage
standards" at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/c80b87648c213c5
Hi Tim,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Tim Daly wrote:
> For *standard test suites*, I believe we should have these in many
> different a
On 30 Aug, 03:09, Tim Daly wrote:
> Bill Hart wrote:
> > Why is this entire thread not on sage-flame? What does software
> > engineering, documentation, test code, etc. have to do with "Creating
> > a viable free open source alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica and
> > Matlab."?
>
> Despite
I am working on 2 new test suites.
One involves the Rubi test suite using patterns for integration.
This is a very large test suite, well over 9000 integrals.
I have created test cases for Axiom but not yet written the
rule-based integration patterns. I'll move them into the CATS
area in the near
Hi Tim,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Tim Daly wrote:
> Tim (somebody, I can't find his name) was going to try the
> CATS integration test suite in Sage. It should be rather easy
> as Sage uses Maxima and the syntax is very close. I don't
> know what became of that effort.
I don't recall read
Hi folks,
for IPython I found myself this weekend writing some pexpect-based
code, and I recall that in the past, Sage has looked into ways of
getting pexpect to run under Windows platforms. Robert Kern pointed
me to this:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/goreckc/sage/wexpect/
but it doesn'
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Tim Daly wrote:
>> Tim (somebody, I can't find his name) was going to try the
>> CATS integration test suite in Sage. It should be rather easy
>> as Sage uses Maxima and the syntax is very close. I
On 30 August 2010 01:41, Bill Hart wrote:
> Why is this entire thread not on sage-flame? What does software
> engineering, documentation, test code, etc. have to do with "Creating
> a viable free open source alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica and
> Matlab."?
Everything!
Correct software en
15 matches
Mail list logo
