On Jul 2, 8:01 am, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 1 July 2010 20:25, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:05 PM, David Kirkby
> > wrote:
> >> I don't understand your proposal. Would it need the patch command
> >> added to Sage? I don't understand your method, so can't comment
> >>
On Jul 2, 2010 8:02am, Adam Webb wrote:
I felt that the important part of the proposal was the use of patches.
Yes.
I don't know if there will really be a lot of space saved but I think
that is less important.
Agreed. But the point I would make is that just removing two of the huge
p
On Jul 2, 2010 8:02am, Adam Webb wrote:
I felt that the important part of the proposal was the use of patches.
Yes.
I don't know if there will really be a lot of space saved but I think
that is less important.
Agreed. But the point I would make is that just removing two of the huge
p
I don't think it's feasible to carry out William's proposal with
conditional patches. I'm +1 on including GNU patch in Sage.
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Fo
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:10:25 -0700
Mike Hansen wrote:
> I don't think it's feasible to carry out William's proposal with
> conditional patches. I'm +1 on including GNU patch in Sage.
I also vote YES to including patch in Sage.
I would like to see some more standardization in how the patches are
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:10:25 -0700
>
> Mike Hansen wrote:
> > I don't think it's feasible to carry out William's proposal with
> > conditional patches. I'm +1 on including GNU patch in Sage.
>
> I also vote YES to including patch in Sage.
>
> I would like to see some more standardization in h
Thanks! I needed something simple to learn how
to review. Someone tell me if I did anything wrong.
Mariah
On Jul 1, 8:52 am, David Kirkby wrote:
> If someone wants an easy patch to review,
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9399
>
> should come pretty easy. Currently a header file i
On 2 July 2010 15:09, Mariah wrote:
> Thanks! I needed something simple to learn how
> to review. Someone tell me if I did anything wrong.
>
> Mariah
Thank you for reviewing it.
You should have added your name as the reviewer. The convention is to
add ones full name.
I had also omitted to add
Well, it's a little dangerous for someone (me) who doesn't really
understand how to *use* the tool to *design the interface* to the
tool. But since I'm rarely bothered by my own ignorance, I'll charge
ahead. :-)
After writing a long, detailed email, I realized it's probably better
to start a wiki
Dear sage-devel,
I consistently have a weird thing happen when I empty Trash (on Mac)
that has a Sage I've used in it.Everything goes fine, but I get
about five messages saying
"The operation can't be completed because the item X is in use"
where X is in the set {python2.6, python, time.so,
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
> I don't think it's feasible to carry out William's proposal with
> conditional patches.
Why? Consider that we *already* successfully conditionally patch
files without using patch at all... and this works for every spkg
included in Sage.
>
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:52 AM, William Stein wrote:
> Why? Consider that we *already* successfully conditionally patch
> files without using patch at all... and this works for every spkg
> included in Sage.
Right, but it's all managed by hand. Once you start making automating
things, then th
Ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9385
raises an error of ATLAS going into an infinite loop on Fedora 13. The submitter
also believe people are having the same problem on ArchLinux. Is this true?
I know there were issues with Fedora 13. Is there anyone who has built Sage
4.4.4
According to the ICU web site
"ICU is a mature, widely used set of C/C++ and Java libraries providing Unicode
and Globalization support for software applications."
R appears to need this on at least some systems, though I'm not sure if it
needed on all of them.
When R is built on Solaris, t
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:58:20 +0100, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> Ticket
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9385
>
> raises an error of ATLAS going into an infinite loop on Fedora 13. The
> submitter
> also believe people are having the same problem on ArchLinux. Is this true?
I ha
I've seen this on Tiger too,
and it might be related to doctesting (which both of us do rather
extensively, I guess, but probably not the average user).
Cheers,
Georg
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-
If gcc/gfortran are used, prereq-0.7 verifies that they are the same
version and aborts if they aren't. Is there a specific requirement
for this? As far as I can see, there is no interaction between the
C/C++ compiler and Fortran compiler output - in particular,
libgfortran has no dependencies on
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 09:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Ryan Hinton wrote:
> Well, it's a little dangerous for someone (me) who doesn't really
> understand how to *use* the tool to *design the interface* to the
> tool. But since I'm rarely bothered by my own ignorance, I'll charge
> ahead. :-)
>
> After writin
On Jul 2, 10:47 pm, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> If gcc/gfortran are used, prereq-0.7 verifies that they are the same
> version and aborts if they aren't. Is there a specific requirement
> for this? As far as I can see, there is no interaction between the
> C/C++ compiler and Fortran compiler output
Ping!
I'd like to repeat my request, since I have just discovered yet
another edge that needs adding:
positive_review --> needs_info
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Robert Miller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to make some tweaks to the workflow on Sage's trac server, in
> particular the annoyi
On Jul 2, 7:31 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> Dear sage-devel,
>
> I consistently have a weird thing happen when I empty Trash (on Mac)
> that has a Sage I've used in it. Everything goes fine, but I get
> about five messages saying
>
> "The operation can't be completed because the item X is in use"
>
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
> Ping!
>
> I'd like to repeat my request, since I have just discovered yet
> another edge that needs adding:
>
> positive_review --> needs_info
Both should be added.
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.
Hi,
I still vote -1 to this, and think it is possible to get around using
patch at runtime.
Nonetheless, I am ok with this proposal going forward, because it
clearly received a lot of support from most developers who commented.
William
On Friday, July 2, 2010, Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:49 PM, William Stein wrote:
> I still vote -1 to this, and think it is possible to get around using
> patch at runtime.
If we can do it and it's not too awkward, then that's great. But, I
personally am not sure how to implement it well. With using patch,
it's just very
Hi,
There is a Sage Days 23.5 in Kaiserslautern, Germany on "Singular and
Sage integration" that is coming up later this month.
http://wiki.sagemath.org/days23.5
There's a little bit of extra funding left. If anybody in Europe is
very, very interested in attending,
please send me an ema
25 matches
Mail list logo
