On Dec 18, 2009, at 7:38 AM, William Stein wrote:
> I wonder if somebody who understands the mac launcher for SAge could comment
> on
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7700
Done. I accepted the ticket and should get around to it after finals are done.
-Ivan
--
To post to this
Hallo,
it seems currently (sage 4.2) that the plot scale is not recomputed
when changing the aspect_ratio, but simply graphically resized. This
leads to possibly overlapping numbers, and looks somehow squeezed.
Example:
p = plot(lambda x: 10*x, (0,1)); p.set_aspect_ratio(1); p
--
To post to thi
Henryk Trappmann wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> it seems currently (sage 4.2) that the plot scale is not recomputed
> when changing the aspect_ratio, but simply graphically resized. This
> leads to possibly overlapping numbers, and looks somehow squeezed.
> Example:
>
> p = plot(lambda x: 10*x, (0,1)); p.se
Jason Grout wrote:
> Henryk Trappmann wrote:
>> Hallo,
>>
>> it seems currently (sage 4.2) that the plot scale is not recomputed
>> when changing the aspect_ratio, but simply graphically resized. This
>> leads to possibly overlapping numbers, and looks somehow squeezed.
>> Example:
>>
>> p = plot(l
> > I think that requiring them for every single function is excessive,
> > for example many functions don't take any parameters but self, or
> > don't return output.
>
> OK, good point. How about requiring INPUT if there are any inputs
> beyond self, and requiring OUTPUT if there are any outputs?
Currently we don't require documentation for __cinit__, __dealloc__ and
__new__. Are there any other functions we want to add to that list? I
could see an argument for _add_ and other arithmetic functions too.
David
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 1:41 PM, David Roe wrote:
>
> > I think that requiring
On Dec 19, 2009, at 10:59 AM, David Roe wrote:
> Currently we don't require documentation for __cinit__, __dealloc__
> and __new__. Are there any other functions we want to add to that
> list? I could see an argument for _add_ and other arithmetic
> functions too.
A TESTS block is certain
Hi!
On 19 Dez., 21:23, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> A TESTS block is certainly a good thing to have for the arithmetic
> operators.
+1
For _add_ etc, the type of both in- and output is clear (IIRC,
coercion etc happens before). But it should certainly be tested.
2 cents
Simon
--
To post to thi
It appears that Scilab 5 (http://www.scilab.org/)
is now GPL v2 compatible according to their web site
and the FAQ for the license that they're using,
http://www.cecill.info/faq.en.html#compatible
Having an interface to Scilab would certainly be
nice. However, I don't think I'll have time to wor
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
> It appears that Scilab 5 (http://www.scilab.org/)
> is now GPL v2 compatible according to their web site
> and the FAQ for the license that they're using,
>
> http://www.cecill.info/faq.en.html#compatible
Excellent. Is there _any_ valuable cod
On 12-19-2009, at 3:50 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>> It appears that Scilab 5 (http://www.scilab.org/)
>> is now GPL v2 compatible according to their web site
>> and the FAQ for the license that they're using,
>>
>> http://www.cecill.info/faq.e
William Stein wrote:
> Excellent. Is there _any_ valuable code/libraries/components/ideas in
> Scilab that could be used in Sage? (I hope yes!) Or are they in
> catchup mode with octave/gsl/numpy/scipy? (I hope not.) Is there
> anything we can offer them...?
Access to t2 for testing on Solar
Sounds good. That's the current requirement.
David
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 19 Dez., 21:23, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
> > A TESTS block is certainly a good thing to have for the arithmetic
> > operators.
>
> +1
>
> For _add_ etc, the type of both in- and o
The site
http://www.sagemath.org/
is not displaying what is intended - it tells you nothing about Sage, except
listing where to download it.
If one adds the /index.html on the end, so we get what I think is actually
intended to be.
Has the server been reconfigured in some way? It looks like t
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:45:50 +, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> The site
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/
>
> is not displaying what is intended - it tells you nothing about Sage, except
> listing where to download it.
>
> If one adds the /index.html on the end, so we get what I think is actually
Alex Ghitza wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:45:50 +, "Dr. David Kirkby"
> wrote:
>> The site
>>
>> http://www.sagemath.org/
>>
>> is not displaying what is intended - it tells you nothing about Sage, except
>> listing where to download it.
>>
>> If one adds the /index.html on the end, so we
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Alex Ghitza wrote:
>> I am not seeing any problems. http://www.sagemath.org/ and
>> http://www.sagemath.org/index.html look identical on my browser.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Alex
>>
>
> Odd, they do not for me.
> Could it be my IP address is seen to be in the UK, and so I'm
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:04:19 +, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
>
> Could it be my IP address is seen to be in the UK, and so I'm being directed
> to
> a different mirror, outside the USA ??
>
Yes, that would be my guess now. Harald would know exactly what's going
on, so hopefully he can enli
On 12-19-2009, at 7:08 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
>> Could it be my IP address is seen to be in the UK, and so I'm being directed
>> to
>> a different mirror, outside the USA ??
>>
>>
>
> Looking more closely, I see Alex is probably in Australia. Perhaps I'm seeing
> a
> different mirr
Hi!
On 20 Dez., 01:08, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> > Could it be my IP address is seen to be in the UK, and so I'm being
> > directed to
> > a different mirror, outside the USA ??
>
> Looking more closely, I see Alex is probably in Australia. Perhaps I'm seeing
> a
> different mirror. Perhaps s
Tim Lahey wrote:
> On 12-19-2009, at 7:08 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
>>> Could it be my IP address is seen to be in the UK, and so I'm being
>>> directed to
>>> a different mirror, outside the USA ??
>>>
>>>
>> Looking more closely, I see Alex is probably in Australia. Perhaps I'm
>> seeing
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> The site
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/
>
> is not displaying what is intended - it tells you nothing about Sage,
> except listing where to download it.
>
> If one adds the /index.html on the end, so we get what I think is
> actually intended to be.
>
> Has the server
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> The site
>>
>> http://www.sagemath.org/
>>
>> is not displaying what is intended - it tells you nothing about Sage,
>> except listing where to download it.
>>
>> If one adds the /index.html on the end, so we get what I think is
>> actually inte
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>> The site
>>>
>>> http://www.sagemath.org/
>>>
>>> is not displaying what is intended - it tells you nothing about Sage,
>>> except listing where to download it.
>>>
>>> If one adds the
Dear SAGE community:
The Jmol development team is starting to build a plot object into
Jmol that SAGE could just pass a group of surfaces/meshes to for
plotting.
Initially we are talking about a 3-D plot object, which would take
care of scaling, axis ticks, axis labels and aspect ratios and a
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Jonathan wrote:
> Dear SAGE community:
> The Jmol development team is starting to build a plot object into
> Jmol that SAGE could just pass a group of surfaces/meshes to for
> plotting.
>
> Initially we are talking about a 3-D plot object, which would take
> ca
26 matches
Mail list logo
