Hi,
I've posted a new version of the compmath proposal here:
http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_summary.pdf
http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_description.pdf
http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/references_cited.pdf
This is basically the final version, though I coul
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted a new version of the compmath proposal here:
>
> http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_summary.pdf
> http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_description.pdf
> http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/references_cited.pdf
>
> This is basica
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 06:26:55AM -0500, Tim Daly wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've posted a new version of the compmath proposal here:
> >
> > http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_summary.pdf
> > http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_description.pdf
> > h
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:28:57AM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted a new version of the compmath proposal here:
>
> http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_summary.pdf
> http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_description.pdf
> http://wstein.org/grants/compma
Why Is It Essential To Keep An Updated Resume!!!
Just check it out guys.
http://highbrains.com/?page_id=1124
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more op
The binomial is buggy again (sage 4.2):
In [143]: [binomial(1,1),binomial(1,2),binomial(1,3),binomial(1,4)]
Out[143]: [1, 0, 0, 0]
In [144]: [binomial(1.0,1),binomial(1.0,2),binomial(1.0,3),binomial
(1.0,4)]
Out[144]: [1.00, 0.000, NaN, NaN]
--
To post to this group, sen
> sage: sorted(g.degree(), reverse=True)
> [4, 4, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2]
This is probably what I was thinking of; I didn't see sample code.
Probably in the situations I used, I just used g.degree() all by its
lonesome self, unsorted, because the cases I needed could be done "by
hand".
- kcrisman
--
To
I confirm this in 4.2.1. This is now #7562.
- kcrisman
On Nov 30, 12:19 pm, Henryk Trappmann wrote:
> The binomial is buggy again (sage 4.2):
>
> In [143]: [binomial(1,1),binomial(1,2),binomial(1,3),binomial(1,4)]
> Out[143]: [1, 0, 0, 0]
>
> In [144]: [binomial(1.0,1),binomial(1.0,2),binomial(
I've just banned this person. I can't find the message, so I guess
another moderator deleted it already.
Sorry for the spam.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Shoaib Khan wrote:
> Why Is It Essential To Keep An Updated Resume!!!
> Just check it out guys.
> http://highbrains.com/?
Hello,
Singular does not build properly on a Fedora system (4 processors
Intel Xeon). The end of the log is copied at the end of this message
and the complete log can be accessed from :
http://iml.univ-mrs.fr/~delecroi/install.log.tar.gz
I will try the binary solution unless you have a solution.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 02:38:35PM -0800, William Cauchois wrote:
> Original author of the patch here. I took some time to look at this
> today and found that the doctesting bug was due to reading the value
> of sys.stdout only once in install(); during doctesting, sys.stdout is
> reset some time a
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:19:14AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
> 1 - Add an option called ``version`` do deprecation where you can put the
> information on since which version of sage this thing was deprecated:
>
> sage: def bar():
> ...sage.misc.misc.deprecation("The function
You may recall some discussion recently about ./sage -bdist was not working on
Solaris, due to a GNUism (the non-POSIX option -a to 'cp').
I've attempted to fix this, by using more appropiate options for systems other
than Linux. There are basically two changes
I am however getting this messag
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:22:36AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
> > I volunteer for combinatorics if Mike wants to get out of it.
> >
> > Alternatively, would it make sense to make sage-combinat the owner,
> > meaning in practice we would share the work between Florent, Mike,
> > myself, for a bet
Hi kcrisman,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:42 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> That is odd; I am pretty sure there used to be such a method, maybe
> two years ago?
Ticket #7564 [1] improves the documentation of the method
GenericGraph.degree() by adding two examples showing how one could use
that method to
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are the trac components with who "owns" each. It's possible that
> many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would
> like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc., just
> respond in this thread.Don't ask me exactly what
Hi!
At #6854 (ready for review, I think), I implemented introspection and
tab completion for elements of Infinite Polynomial Rings. This became
necessary since they have a __getattr__ method that allows to use
methods of the underlying *finite* polynomial (e.g., _latex_) in an
easy way, to the exp
I just built a Sage binary on one machine (Netra T1, Solaris 10
03/2005) and move it to a faster machine (Blade 2000) running the
latest version of Solaris. I installed it as root, in a different
location from where it was built on the first machine. I then tried to
run it as a normal user, and get
> cp: cannot access *.sage
In short: that does not seem to be a new problem.
I've seen this line before (I think I get it every time I build a
bdist on my Macs), and I admit, that I never cared. The files ending
in *.sage are supposed to be loadable/attachable scripts (in)to Sage
sessions, see e.
Hi David,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:29 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> I just built a Sage binary on one machine (Netra T1, Solaris 10
> 03/2005) and move it to a faster machine (Blade 2000) running the
> latest version of Solaris. I installed it as root, in a different
> location from where it was buil
Hi Minh
On 30 Nov., 23:44, Minh Nguyen wrote:
...
> My two-cent, but you probably know already: Say as root, you build
> Sage and then move the resulting binary to a different directory.
> After moving the whole Sage (binary) directory, you need to start up
> Sage as root at least once before you
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:29 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> I just built a Sage binary on one machine (Netra T1, Solaris 10
>> 03/2005) and move it to a faster machine (Blade 2000) running the
>> latest version of Solaris. I installed it as root, in a different
>> lo
Simon King wrote:
> Hi Minh
>
> On 30 Nov., 23:44, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
>> My two-cent, but you probably know already: Say as root, you build
>> Sage and then move the resulting binary to a different directory.
>> After moving the whole Sage (binary) directory, you need to start up
>> Sage a
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 at 10:43PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > Does that mean that one of us has to move to Vladivostok, Pekin or
> > Sidney ?
>
> We should get Dan to join. I mean: Dan Bump if Mike is still in
> Malaysia, and Dan Drake otherwise. Actually probably both :-)
I was going to men
I build Sage 4.2.0 on a machine with the first release of Solaris 10.
(A painfully slow process, as the machine is only 500 MHz). I
upgraded that to 4.2.1, which went without a hitch.
As you will gather from a previous email or two, I've created a
Solaris binary using
./sage -bdist
on the slow
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Simon King wrote:
> I guess David's point was that this information should be stated more
> clearly in the Readme text.
See ticket #7565 [1] for a newer README.txt file. I hope the newer
README.txt is much clearer about the concern David raised.
[1]
2009/11/30 Minh Nguyen :
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:29 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> I just built a Sage binary on one machine (Netra T1, Solaris 10
>> 03/2005) and move it to a faster machine (Blade 2000) running the
>> latest version of Solaris. I installed it as root, in a different
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:22:36AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
>> > I volunteer for combinatorics if Mike wants to get out of it.
>> >
>> > Alternatively, would it make sense to make sage-combinat the owner,
>> > meaning in practice we w
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here are the trac components with who "owns" each. It's possible that
>> many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would
>> like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> You may recall some discussion recently about ./sage -bdist was not working
> on
> Solaris, due to a GNUism (the non-POSIX option -a to 'cp').
>
> I've attempted to fix this, by using more appropiate options for systems other
> than Linu
William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> You may recall some discussion recently about ./sage -bdist was not working
>> on
>> Solaris, due to a GNUism (the non-POSIX option -a to 'cp').
>>
>> I've attempted to fix this, by using more appropiate options
Oh, I thought 'tbd' was 'the benevolent dictator' :)
-Marshall
On Nov 30, 3:52 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > Here are the trac components with who "owns" each. It's possible that
> > many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would
> > li
I've resurrected this post because I have some indication of the
source of the subject start-up errors. The sage version is 4.2.1, my
architecture is amd64 running Gentoo and my gcc info is:
gcc version 4.3.4 (Gentoo 4.3.4 p1.0, pie-10.1.5)
Building sage with the usual "make" results in a sage th
On Nov 29, 2009, at 5:22 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Nathann,
>
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Nathann Cohen > wrote:
>
>
>
>> If I make no mistake, Robert Miller rewrote the Graph class in C,
>> which sounds like we are trying to remove networkX from Sage and use
>> our own version of graph
On Nov 29, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
> GluCat ( http://glucat.sf.net ) currently uses uBLAS, which is part
> of Boost.
> I'm looking at Eigen (
> http://www.macresearch.org/interview-eigen-matrix-library
> http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/
> http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=B
On Nov 29, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> HMmmm...
>
> I started creating new modules, and I wanted to split it piece by
> piece, with time. Ticket #7365 creates a module named
> graph_decomposition which I intend to fill ( but I will begin to write
> these functions when this patch will
Isn't there an option to set to run all the spkg internal tests?
- Robert
On Nov 29, 2009, at 2:16 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> I was just looking at
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7095
>
> "os x 10.6 port -- numerous mysterious errors caused by weird 'abort
> trap' issue"
>
> and se
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery <
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr> wrote:
> For the record: there is a patch of mine on trac with sage
> -fixdoctests improvements, in particular for multiline output (sorry,
> I am in the train, and unable to look up the ticket number). By
> accident i
38 matches
Mail list logo
