[sage-devel] Solaris - top level README.txt is missing what it says is there.

2009-04-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Looking at the top level README.txt in sage-3.4.2.alpha0, there are a couple of things about Solaris of note. The first is minor - the second less so. 1) At one point its called Solaris, and another SOLARIS. After finding 'Solaris' at the top, I did a search (using vi as the editor) and found

[sage-devel] polybori uses 'deprecated or antiquated header' files.

2009-04-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
I'm not sure if this is Solaris specific or not, but I noticed that there are complaints about the use of 'deprecated or antiquated header' files in polybori. #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header which may be removed without further notice at a future dat

[sage-devel] PLMMS 2009: Last Call for Papers

2009-04-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
The ACM SIGSAM 2009 International Workshop on Programming Languages for Mechanized Mathematics Systems PLMMS 2009 Munich, Germany; August 21, 2009 http://plmms09.cse.tamu.ed

[sage-devel] Re: multipolynomial bug

2009-04-28 Thread Alex Ghitza
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > On Monday 27 April 2009, John Cremona wrote: >> 2^16 is the smallest for which givaro is not used.  In char.2, we switch to >> NTL. > > Yes, it is likely in the conversion routine from NTL to Singular. > I managed to track this all the

[sage-devel] Re: multipolynomial bug

2009-04-28 Thread John Cremona
Alex, you have found it! The variable i in that code is undefined. Replace it by 0 so it reads {{{ n1 = naInit(GF2_conv_to_long(GF2X_coeff(rep,0))) }}} and then it works. Must run to a seminar or I would make the patch... John 2009/4/28 Alex Ghitza : > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:

[sage-devel] Re: multipolynomial bug

2009-04-28 Thread John Cremona
Patch posted at #5919 (and already has a positive review -- thanks, malb!) 2009/4/28 John Cremona : > Alex, you have found it! The variable i in that code is undefined. > Replace it by 0 so it reads > {{{ > n1 = naInit(GF2_conv_to_long(GF2X_coeff(rep,0))) > }}} > > and then it works. >

[sage-devel] Re: polybori uses 'deprecated or antiquated header' files.

2009-04-28 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 28, 12:45 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: > I'm not sure if this is Solaris specific or not, but I noticed that > there are complaints about the use of 'deprecated or antiquated header' > files in polybori. It is not Solaris specific and will be fixed in the next PolyBoRi release. Cheers

[sage-devel] Re: multipolynomial bug

2009-04-28 Thread Alex Ghitza
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:02 AM, John Cremona wrote: > > Alex, you have found it!  The variable i in that code is undefined. > Replace it by 0 so it reads > {{{ >           n1 = naInit(GF2_conv_to_long(GF2X_coeff(rep,0))) > }}} > > and then it works. > > Must run to a seminar or I would make the

[sage-devel] Re: figures in terminal using pyglet

2009-04-28 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:59 PM, William Stein wrote: > > 2009/4/3 Ondrej Certik : >> >> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Jason Grout >> wrote: >>> >>> An interesting post on the matplotlib list pointed to this recent >>> project playing around with using pyglet to draw a terminal: >>> >>> http:

[sage-devel] Maple 13

2009-04-28 Thread William Stein
Hi, Maple 13 was released today, I think. The "new features" page is here: http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/new_features/full_list.aspx Looking it over, the only overlap with Sage (current or in development features) seems to be the following: * They now have graph isomorphism t

[sage-devel] Wolfram Alpha and Google (Trendalyzer)

2009-04-28 Thread kcrisman
I believe these services are at least partially relevant to this list, particularly the Wolfram announcement. If they have been mentioned recently here, my apologies. - kcrisman http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-10229202-76.html?tag=newsLeadStoriesArea.1 http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/28

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-04-28 Thread Dan Drake
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 at 04:10PM -0700, William Stein wrote: > Maple 13 was released today, I think. The "new features" page is here: [...] > * The combinatorics package now includes the Eulerian numbers of > first and second order. [...] > I don't know anything about Eulerian numbers. def eule

[sage-devel] sage-4.0 final push status update

2009-04-28 Thread William Stein
Hi, Our goals for Sage-4.0, in order, are: 1. Switch from Maxima to Pynac for Symbolics. 2. Get doctest coverage for the core Sage library to 75%. 3. Official 32-bit Solaris support 4. OS X 64-bit. The top priority items on the TODO list for Sage 4.0 are: 1. Fix that symmetrica is broken on

[sage-devel] Trac server down?

2009-04-28 Thread Justin C. Walker
Hi, all, Trying to access the trac server, I get, variously, Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/sage/sage_install/new/ local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Trac-0.11.3-py2.5.egg/trac/web/ api.py", line 367, in send_error 'text/html') File "/home/sage/ sage_install/new/local/lib/pytho

[sage-devel] Re: Is Maxima incompatible with Sage licensing

2009-04-28 Thread Tom Boothby
Yeah, you might note that. But you should also note that when the fed tries to restrict software export, they lose. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernstein_v._United_States http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junger_v._Daley On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:12 PM, root wrote: > > It might be noted that, sinc

[sage-devel] Re: Trac server down?

2009-04-28 Thread kcrisman
> Is it just me? No, I get the same thing right now. - kcrisman --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit th

[sage-devel] Re: Trac server down?

2009-04-28 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 28, 7:23 pm, kcrisman wrote: > > Is it just me? > > No, I get the same thing right now. > > - kcrisman Fixed. Some partition run out of space :( Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To un

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.0 final push status update

2009-04-28 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 28, 6:53 pm, William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > Our goals for Sage-4.0, in order, are: > > 1. Switch from Maxima to Pynac for Symbolics. > 2. Get doctest coverage for the core Sage library to 75%. > 3. Official 32-bit Solaris support > 4. OS X 64-bit. > > The top priority items on the TODO l

[sage-devel] 3.4.1.rc0 reviews ... tick tock

2009-04-28 Thread mabshoff
Hello folks, 3.4.1.rc0 ought to drop in the next 18 hours, so if you want something in and still need it reviewed you ought to hurry up. Once rc0 is done only essential bugfixes will be merged since we want the release to be done by the end of this months ;) Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~

[sage-devel] Re: Solaris - top level README.txt is missing what it says is there.

2009-04-28 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 28, 12:04 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: Hi David, > Looking at the top level README.txt in sage-3.4.2.alpha0, there are a > couple of things about Solaris of note. The first is minor - the second > less so. > > 1) At one point its called Solaris, and another SOLARIS. After finding > 'S

[sage-devel] Re: Trac server down?

2009-04-28 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Apr 28, 2009, at 20:36 , mabshoff wrote: > On Apr 28, 7:23 pm, kcrisman wrote: >>> Is it just me? >> >> No, I get the same thing right now. >> >> - kcrisman > > Fixed. Some partition run out of space :( Tnx! J -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large Institute for the Absorption of Federa

[sage-devel] Re: 3.4.1.rc0 reviews ... tick tock

2009-04-28 Thread Alex Ghitza
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:44 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > Hello folks, > > 3.4.1.rc0 ought to drop in the next 18 hours, so if you want something > in and still need it reviewed you ought to hurry up. Assuming that you mean 3.4.2.rc0: I have two patches up that need fairly simple reviews: - #5479 i

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.0 final push status update

2009-04-28 Thread Gonzalo Tornaria
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:41 AM, mabshoff wrote: >>   5. Switch from Clisp to ECL: >>          http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5929 > > Yeah, the main issue is not so much getting ecl and then Maxima to > build, the main problem will be dealing with potential pexpect issues > that migh

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-04-28 Thread Roman Pearce
On Apr 28, 4:10 pm, William Stein wrote: > Maple 13 was released today, I think.  The "new features" page is here: >    http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/new_features/full_list.aspx > > Looking it over, the only overlap with Sage (current or in development > features) seems to be the follow

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.0 final push status update

2009-04-28 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 28, 9:06 pm, Gonzalo Tornaria wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:41 AM, mabshoff wrote: > >>   5. Switch from Clisp to ECL: > >>          http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5929 Hi, > > Yeah, the main issue is not so much getting ecl and then Maxima to > > build, the main prob

[sage-devel] Re: 3.4.2.rc0 reviews ... tick tock

2009-04-28 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 28, 9:04 pm, Alex Ghitza wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:44 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > > Hello folks, > > > 3.4.1.rc0 ought to drop in the next 18 hours, so if you want something > > in and still need it reviewed you ought to hurry up. > > Assuming that you mean 3.4.2.rc0: Yeah, sorry