davidp wrote:
>> I haven't seen a definition of the laplacian matrix for looped digraphs,
>> but sure, okay, I assume this is standard, then? I don't think the
>> laplacian_matrix function calculates this quantity for digraphs. This
>> might be a bug, then.
>
> It is standard to take the Laplac
Update:
Rob I just downloaded SAGE 3.4 from that link and got
the correct checksum.
The next week, the newest version of SAGElwlcd will be
realeased including SAGE 3.4.
As said before I appreciate any feedback you can give me
on the past release (comments, etc). The same in case people
you know
Is any of you guys a launchpad member?
I'm not able to contact the Quantities developers, this is the email I sent
to their mailing list, but it has probably been filtered because of not
being a developer. Jason can you forward this to the Quantities developers?
https://edge.launchpad.net/~python-q
On Mar 21, 1:19 am, Lucio Lastra wrote:
As said before I appreciate any feedback you can give me
on the past release (comments, etc). The same in case people
you know wants to try it out.
Hi Lucio,
Several suggestions and comments. I've got a basic idea of what is
involved here, but can't say
Maurizio wrote:
> Is any of you guys a launchpad member?
> I'm not able to contact the Quantities developers, this is the email I
> sent to their mailing list, but it has probably been filtered because of
> not being a developer. Jason can you forward this to the Quantities
> developers?
> http
As I see there are no specific plot commands for complex functions.
There are 3 types that would be preferable:
1. parametric plot
2. contour plot
3. conformal plot
The parametric plot can be simulated with parametric_plot and the
contour plot with contour_plot.
However for these functions one ha
I've opened a question on their launchpad project:
https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/python-quantities/+question/64894
I hope you guys share my feelings, so that I've been a good ambassador
Regards
Maurizio
On 21 Mar, 19:28, Jason Grout wrote:
> Maurizio wrote:
> > Is any of you guys a laun
I agree... but what about magnitude and argument of the complex
number? I find this representation often more useful than real and
imaginary, so I think it's just a matter of the application.
+1 from me
Maurizio
On 21 Mar, 22:28, Henryk Trappmann wrote:
> As I see there are no specific plot co
Maurizio wrote:
> I've opened a question on their launchpad project:
>
> https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/python-quantities/+question/64894
>
> I hope you guys share my feelings, so that I've been a good ambassador
>
Thanks! We're right behind you on trying to see if this would be a good
Henryk Trappmann wrote:
> As I see there are no specific plot commands for complex functions.
> There are 3 types that would be preferable:
> 1. parametric plot
> 2. contour plot
> 3. conformal plot
>
> The parametric plot can be simulated with parametric_plot and the
> contour plot with contour_
On Mar 21, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> Henryk Trappmann wrote:
>> As I see there are no specific plot commands for complex functions.
>> There are 3 types that would be preferable:
>> 1. parametric plot
>> 2. contour plot
>> 3. conformal plot
>>
>> The parametric plot can be simulated
On Mar 21, 11:50 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> I have actually already implemented this--I should get my code
> cleaned up and attach it to a ticket. (I put it on old waiting for
> fast_callable to handle complex inputs, but that's not a requirement).
Where can I get your code?
And what exact
On Mar 21, 2009, at 4:09 PM, Henryk Trappmann wrote:
> On Mar 21, 11:50 pm, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> I have actually already implemented this--I should get my code
>> cleaned up and attach it to a ticket. (I put it on old waiting for
>> fast_callable to handle complex inputs, but that's not a
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
>> Where can I get your code?
>
> I'll post make a ticket and post a patch soon.
>
>> And what exactly did you implement? parametric_plot and contour_plot?
>
> Basically, I implemented this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> File:Complex_
Is there any reason why plot converts the arguments of a function
allways to float?
This way it is impossible to zoom in, and sometimes there are strange
artifacts, like breaks in otherwise smooth functions.
Why not just take the number domain of the interval borders.
If it is QQ, then give as arg
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mar 20, 12:09 am, Gustav Delius wrote:
>> I read that Sage was upgraded to using NetworkX v0.99 as of Sage
>> version 3.3. However onwww.sagenb.org, one still has to use
>> networkx.XGraph() class even though that has be
Henryk Trappmann wrote:
> Is there any reason why plot converts the arguments of a function
> allways to float?
> This way it is impossible to zoom in, and sometimes there are strange
> artifacts, like breaks in otherwise smooth functions.
> Why not just take the number domain of the interval bord
Hello developers,
Just wanted to draw your attention to the fact that REDUCE has been
released under a modified BSD license. Please see:
http://reduce-algebra.com/
http://reduce-algebra.sourceforge.net/
http://www.zib.de/Symbolik/reduce/
http://www.codemist.co.uk/reduce/
http://en.wikipedia.org
Hazem wrote:
>
> Hello developers,
>
> Just wanted to draw your attention to the fact that REDUCE has been
> released under a modified BSD license. Please see:
>
> http://reduce-algebra.com/
> http://reduce-algebra.sourceforge.net/
> http://www.zib.de/Symbolik/reduce/
> http://www.codemist.co.u
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Hazem wrote:
>
>
> Hello developers,
>
> Just wanted to draw your attention to the fact that REDUCE has been
> released under a modified BSD license. Please see:
>
> http://reduce-algebra.com/
> http://reduce-algebra.sourceforge.net/
> http://www.zib.de/Symbo
Hello,
I'm not really familiar with Reduce, and am not a CAS developer. I am
a kind of "interested observer" and I try to be helpful by collecting
info about existing CAS systems and ideas and submitting links to the
experts - you guys.
Since I am alot more familiar with physics/engineering/nume
>>
>> Ondrej
>>
>
> Cool. Please post here when you setup all the project infrastructure,
> so I can join the mailing list, etc.
Ok, here is a preliminary stuff:
http://code.google.com/p/qsnake/wiki/SPD
and it rocks, it installs on our university cluster and all numpy,
scipy etc. just works:
22 matches
Mail list logo
