On Jan 5, 7:09 am, "Georg S. Weber"
wrote:
> On 4 Jan., 00:09, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
Hi Georg,
> > I have been cleaning up the wiki of Spam and unfortunately on occasion
> > I am removing content that isn't spam, i.e. I removed the art page.
> > But fortunately none of the content is
On 4 Jan., 00:09, mabshoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been cleaning up the wiki of Spam and unfortunately on occasion
> I am removing content that isn't spam, i.e. I removed the art page.
> But fortunately none of the content is lost, so please let me know if
> anything is missing and I will resto
2009/1/5 Martin Rubey :
>
> (not sure whether this belongs to sage-support or sage-devel)
>
> I'm preparing class for tomorrow, and ran across something I do not quite
> understand:
>
> sage: f=ZZ[x].random_element(10)
> sage: g=ZZ[x].random_element(10)
> sage: timeit('gcd(QQ[x](f),QQ[x](g))')
> 1
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:21 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> That is odd since surge protection is off. But it has happened twice
> now recently, so maybe someone ought to poke around.
I gave the option to the *correct* moinmoin config file to turn it off
this morning. It was on before (obviously, since
"John Cremona" writes:
> 2009/1/5 Martin Rubey :
> >
> > (not sure whether this belongs to sage-support or sage-devel)
> >
> > I'm preparing class for tomorrow, and ran across something I do not quite
> > understand:
> >
> > sage: f=ZZ[x].random_element(10)
> > sage: g=ZZ[x].random_element(10)
>
On Jan 5, 10:28 am, "William Stein" wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:21 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> > That is odd since surge protection is off. But it has happened twice
> > now recently, so maybe someone ought to poke around.
>
> I gave the option to the *correct* moinmoin config file to turn it
On Jan 4, 10:58 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:52 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> >> I.e., for Sage we build only the static readline. Can't Python, Gap,
> >> PARI, etc. just link in a static readline?
>
> > Well, I tried that and I ended up with a Python without readline
> >
On Jan 5, 10:46 am, mabshoff wrote:
> On Jan 4, 10:58 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
> > Well, my question is first: does this work?
>
> I would prefer to solve it another way, but it would work.
Oops, right after pressing "send" I realized why this might be a bad
idea: Installing readline-dev
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 4, 10:58 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:52 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
>> >> I.e., for Sage we build only the static readline. Can't Python, Gap,
>> >> PARI, etc. just link in a static readline?
>>
>> > Wel
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 4, 10:58 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:52 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
>> >> I.e., for Sage we build only the static readline. Can't Python, Gap,
>> >> PARI, etc. just link in a static readline?
>>
>> > Wel
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:03 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 4, 10:58 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:52 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> >> I.e., for Sage we build only the static readline. Can't Python,
On Jan 5, 11:03 am, "William Stein" wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> > Yes, that trick was my first idea.
>
> Wait a minute. Just for the record I just tested my OpenSuse 32-bit
> build of sage with libreadline.so* deleted, and Python, Gap, and PARI
> all *do* ge
(not sure whether this belongs to sage-support or sage-devel)
I'm preparing class for tomorrow, and ran across something I do not quite
understand:
sage: f=ZZ[x].random_element(10)
sage: g=ZZ[x].random_element(10)
sage: timeit('gcd(QQ[x](f),QQ[x](g))')
125 loops, best of 3: 2.96 ms per loop
sage
On Jan 4, 2009, at 11:47 AM, ggrafendorfer wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> thanks for your answer,
> I not sure if I know the difference between coercion and conversion,
> could you explain it to me?
A coercion is implicit and happens, for example, when you do arithmetic.
sage: 1 + 1/2# 1 is coerced
Tried to install graphviz into sage 3.2.1 using sage -i
graphviz-2.16.1.p0
Got errors -- see log posted below -- seems like trac#1762 (http://
trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1762), but repo version still not
right?
I like pydot and Networkx in python and want to use them in sage
notebook.
-
On Jan 5, 11:59 am, "rsnowakow...@gmail.com"
wrote:
Hi,
> Tried to install graphviz into sage 3.2.1 using sage -i
> graphviz-2.16.1.p0
>
> Got errors -- see log posted below -- seems like trac#1762 (http://
> trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1762), but repo version still not
> right?
There
Sorry I forgot to include the install.log lines -- everything went
well until the end (see below).
This is ubuntu linux 32 bit (Intrepid 8.10). The original install was:
sage-3.2.1-ubuntu8.04-32bit-PENTIUM-M-i686-Linux.tar.gz because it
seemed like the best match. The only optional ins
On Jan 5, 12:14 pm, "rsnowakow...@gmail.com"
wrote:
Hi,
> Sorry I forgot to include the install.log lines -- everything went
> well until the end (see below).
>
> This is ubuntu linux 32 bit (Intrepid 8.10). The original install was:
> sage-3.2.1-ubuntu8.04-32bit-PENTIUM-M-i686-Linux
I just checked and the latest GraphViz is graphviz-2.20.3.tar.gz, so
if anyone wants this updated someone make a ticket and someone else
will take care of it :)
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
This worked! Thanks.
On Jan 5, 3:20 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> On Jan 5, 12:14 pm, "rsnowakow...@gmail.com"
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Sorry I forgot to include the install.log lines -- everything went
> > well until the end (see below).
>
> > This is ubuntu linux 32 bit (Intrepid 8.10). The original i
20 matches
Mail list logo
