On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Actually, the concept Timothy is talking about is true. The framework
>> for running notebook processes in Knoboo is very different from what
>> Sage does to serve notebooks. Indeed, the machine running actual
>> noteb
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Dorian Raymer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> This is a good discussion. It's interesting to see, after all this time, the
> public notebook being attacked! (exclaimed in the most respectful, positive,
> excited that now this problem really has to be solved mano
cript
> to point to the right directory, I have a clean shell, but I still get
> the error.
>
> As before, this on an Ubuntu Intrepid amd64 system. Suggestions?
>
> Dan
>
> 1.
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/search?group=sage-devel&q=tests+hang+with+3.1.2
&
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 at 12:08AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> This is a shot in the dark, but maybe ipython was upgraded and your
> ipythonrc is incompatible somehow. Could you try deleting
> $HOME/.sage/ipython and try again?
No dice. Same error.
Although I did notice that Sage *did* start, and
On Oct 15, 12:08 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I built 3.1.3 with no trouble (parallel build now works), and in "make
> > test" I got the usual failures with Lisp and Maxima [1]. But now I can't
> > eve
I propose that there should be links from the front page of
sagemath.org to:
1. The source download
2. The source browser
Since, after all the emphasis is on open source. It's a pretty trivial
point, but it would be nice to be one click away...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~--
I put a patch up at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4291
which I'm pretty sure should fix the init.sage issue. It'd be good if
someone else could test this out.
--Mike
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:05 PM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Builds fine in real time 349m6.025s on P
On Oct 15, 2008, at 6:44 AM, Robert Miller wrote:
> I propose that there should be links from the front page of
> sagemath.org to:
>
> 1. The source download
>
> 2. The source browser
>
> Since, after all the emphasis is on open source. It's a pretty trivial
> point, but it would be nice to be on
+1
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 15, 2008, at 6:44 AM, Robert Miller wrote:
>
>> I propose that there should be links from the front page of
>> sagemath.org to:
>>
>> 1. The source download
>>
>> 2. The source browser
>>
>> Since, after all
+1
On 15 Oct, 15:49, "Timothy Clemans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Robert Bradshaw
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 15, 2008, at 6:44 AM, Robert Miller wrote:
>
> >> I propose that there should be links from the front page of
> >> sagemath.org t
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 at 01:18AM -0700, mabshoff wrote:
> Unfortunately I did not have time to upgrade clisp, but I should have
> an spkg for you to test by the weekend, i.e. after I have made it home
> from SD 10 :)
Sweet. I want to complain about my Lisp/Maxima problems often enough so
you don't f
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 at 03:15AM -0700, mabshoff wrote:
> Not to steal someone's thunder, but Mike and Burcin determined that
> the problem is sage.init being parsed too early. They are working on a
> fix, so we should have a working version soon. As people would have
> guessed I do not use a sage.in
/devel/sage-main/mercurial-howto.txt
To emphasize -- if you try to use Mercurial as a "clone of darcs", you'll
get frustrated and confused -- Mercurial works a bit more like svn
or bizaare-ng or git than like darcs. It is *very* different
^^^
William, did you write that on purpose?
htt
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have just downloaded and unpacked
> http://sage.apcocoa.org/linux/32bit/sage-3.1.2-debian32-intel-i686-Linux.tar.gz
>
> The sage binary is now
>
> ~/software/lib/sage/sage
>
> and ~/software/bin/sage links to this plac
I have just downloaded and unpacked
http://sage.apcocoa.org/linux/32bit/sage-3.1.2-debian32-intel-i686-Linux.tar.gz
The sage binary is now
~/software/lib/sage/sage
and ~/software/bin/sage links to this place while ~/software/bin is in
my PATH.
Then I read ~/software/lib/sage/devel/sage-main/m
On Oct 15, 1:49 am, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 at 01:18AM -0700, mabshoff wrote:
Hi Dan,
> > Unfortunately I did not have time to upgrade clisp, but I should have
> > an spkg for you to test by the weekend, i.e. after I have made it home
> > from SD 10 :)
>
> Sw
On Oct 14, 2008, at 10:04 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here are the minimal fixes for the final 3.1.3:
>
> #4271: Paul Zimmermann: improve coverage test of ell_generic.py to
> 100%, and fix typos [Reviewed by John Cremona]
> #4272: Michael Abshoff: add the files from new coercion to
Hi, I know that it is important to emphasize on open source. Therefore
I even mention the GPL license in the first sentence. There are also
two links to the source browser on the index.html page since a long
time:
one is in the header of each page, "open source" in the first line and
below the 6 b
Related to Mike's fix is the macports/fink error message; this is hard
to fix for those without a lot of shell experience. Could this be
added to the build error message when /sw or /opt/local is in the
PATH? It would have made things easier for me, and I was even
expecting this because of the t
On 10/15/2008 10:21 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Oct 14, 6:49 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I wonder if any of this code sponsored by NAG is truely FOSS. I
>> didn't see any licensing statements though I didn't dig very deep.
> Aldor is not free as I am sure many Axiom/FriCAS devel
Hi,
I found an interesting review of Sage at Softpedia:
http://www.softpedia.com/reviews/linux/Sage-3-0-2-Review-Review-93004.shtml
It's a couple of pages long and details a new user's experience playing
around in Sage. The reviewer gives Sage an overall five star rating.
William
--
Wil
On Oct 14, 6:49 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if any of this code sponsored by NAG is truely FOSS.
> I didn't see any licensing statements though I didn't dig very deep.
Aldor is not free as I am sure many Axiom/FriCAS developers will tell
you. PoSSo is still being ma
On Oct 15, 5:49 am, Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ralf,
> I have just downloaded and
> unpackedhttp://sage.apcocoa.org/linux/32bit/sage-3.1.2-debian32-intel-i686-Li...
> I run debian etch and have not otherwise installed mercurial.
>
> BTW.
This file is just plain wrong and
Builds fine in real time 349m6.025s on PPC OSX.4
Same "problem", fixed by moving init.sage.
- kcrisman
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For mor
Hello,
I wanted to call attention to Trac #4303, which I just opened, in the
hopes that the right person to fix it will see it. It has to do with
the color of plotted points.
>
> From the docstring for point2d, the following works fine:
>
> sage: p = point(((0.5, 0.5), (1, 2), (0.5, 0.9), (-1,-1
On Oct 15, 2:39 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Zimmermann is hitting the same IPython problem as you do and Mike
> Hansen and Burcin are debugging it locally on his machine. So
> hopefully we will have a fix soon and might do a 3.1.4 because of it.
Not to steal someone's thunde
Hi Jason,
This is actually something I fixed that's in Sage 3.1.3 (soon to be
3.1.4). It is a duplicate of #2076 and #4167. I hope that fix was
fast enough for you :-)
--Mike
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Jason Bandlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to call attention to
I tried
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tar -zxvf sage-3.1.3-sage.math-only-x86_64-
Linux.tar.gz
(copied from
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.1.3/)
and it gives me the error:
sage-3.1.3-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux/local/lib/clisp-2.46/base/
width.o
sage-3.1.3-sage.math-only
Hey John -- it looks like your copy of the file got hosed somehow. Did
you start the untar before the file finished copying over? Maybe try
recopying it and untar again?
-cc
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 1:41 PM, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I tried
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tar -zxvf sag
On Oct 15, 1:48 pm, "Craig Citro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey John -- it looks like your copy of the file got hosed somehow. Did
> you start the untar before the file finished copying over? Maybe try
> recopying it and untar again?
>
> -cc
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 1:41 PM, John Voight <[
On Oct 15, 3:52 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm giving a talk at Bordeaux tomorrow that is a sort of birds eye view
> overview
> of number theory functionality in Sage. I've attached my slides to this
> email.
Hi,
some spelling issues:
apostrophe missing: "Sage
Looks good!
a few minor details:
on pages 2 and 3, what do the "# not tested" mean? do they need to be
there?
on page 5, "colling the plot method" should be "calling the plot method"
on page 6, "one should never plots" should be "one should never plot"
on page 8, "chooses when to uses" shoul
On Oct 15, 2008, at 3:52 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm giving a talk at Bordeaux tomorrow that is a sort of birds eye
> view overview
> of number theory functionality in Sage. I've attached my slides to
> this email.
I get a blank page (p. 10) between "p-adic regulators" and "p-ad
On Oct 15, 2008, at 4:40 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Oct 15, 3:52 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> This talk (and the other two?) should obviously be stuffed (together
> with John's talk from SD 10) into some manual.
+1
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large
Instit
Looks great ... and gets me fired up about getting some work done! :)
Here are a few minor questions/corrections that weren't above:
- p-adic L-series slide: should Rob Pollack's name appear somewhere?
- complex L-functions: in the definition of L(E,s), you have
"pp^{1-2s}". I think you want eit
There is a typo on the page "Matrix of Frobenius on Hyperelliptic
Curves". Where you say "We do the same calculation over the bigger
field F_{101^4}", it's not doing anything over an extension field.
It's computing in Z/101^4 Z.
david
On Oct 15, 2008, at 6:52 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi
36 matches
Mail list logo
