On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 26, 2008, at 1:43 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> It's the "programatically" part that makes it a bit more difficult.
>>> so imagine doing
On Aug 25, 2008, at 8:35 AM, Gary Furnish wrote:
> I've been trying to get an answer for this question for the last few
> weeks: Is the plan to extend ginac (write algorithms in C) or to
> extend sage (write new algorithms in Sage) using cython/python?
I don't think this was addressed in the ema
+1 from me to include Pynac/GiNaC in Sage,
Martin Albrecht asked about the Windows porting issue: I looked at the
GiNaC code and it is very clean C++. The maintainer is willing to
merge MSVC related patches where needed, i.e. export statements for
the symbols we need. I am not aware of any other
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:49 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> BTW, one important warning: ginac and sympycore are missing
>> assumptions and sympy only has very trivial ones, like positive,
>> negative, integer, even, odd, etc. This is really important for any
>> nontrivial thing
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:49 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, one important warning: ginac and sympycore are missing
>>> assumptions and sympy only has very trivial ones, like positive,
>>> nega
>>> I think it's just about getting people to fix it. There are many
>>> people around who can fix Python/Cython and a little less (I guess)
>>> who can fix C++ and C. But a lot less who can fix lisp.
>
> As I mentioned before, another big
> problem is that lisp doesn't manipulate native Python ob
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:43 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:49 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
BTW, one important warning: ginac and sympycore are mis
On Aug 25, 11:50 pm, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> >>> I think it's just about getting people to fix it. There are many
> >>> people around who can fix Python/Cython and a little less (I guess)
> >>> who can fix C++ and C. But a lot less who can fix lisp.
>
> > As I mentioned
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
