Hello folks,
there have been a large, nebulous set of rules regarding how things
are done in trac, patch review and merging and the Sage development
process in general. Now I finally took the time to clear those up and
I put a *draft* of the guidelines up at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/TracGuidelin
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> here we go with 2.11.rc0. Hopefully this will be identical
> to the final 2.11 release. So please build, doctest and
> report all issues you hit. We thing we have fixed all
> reported doctest failures. Depending on whether issues do
> crop up we might do a 2.11.
From sci.math.symbolic
See also the follow up.
Original Message
Subject: Re: benchmarking CAS
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 06:57:32 GMT
From: Nasser Abbasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Nasser Abbasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
Newsgroups: sci.math.sym
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:41 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here we go with 2.11.rc0. Hopefully this will be identical
> to the final 2.11 release. So please build, doctest and
> report all issues you hit.
On 32bit-intel Ubuntu 7.10 I had one failure, same as Jaap found but
with mor
On Mar 30, 2:13 pm, "Carlo Hamalainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:41 AM, mabshoff
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > here we go with 2.11.rc0. Hopefully this will be identical
> > to the final 2.11 release. So please build, doctest and
> > report all issues you hit
On Mar 30, 2008, at 6:31 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> there have been a large, nebulous set of rules regarding how things
> are done in trac, patch review and merging and the Sage development
> process in general. Now I finally took the time to clear those up and
> I put a *draft* of
On Mar 30, 3:50 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2008, at 6:31 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hello folks,
>
> > there have been a large, nebulous set of rules regarding how things
> > are done in trac, patch review and merging and the Sage development
> > process in g
> On a quick skim-read, I found the "Sage Specific" paragraph very
> confusing. Are you trying to say that if someone makes up their own
> version of Sage that ships different versions of packages to the ones
> we normally ship, then they are on their own? Or something else?
>
> david
One
I get the same as Carlo.
John
On Mar 30, 1:13 pm, "Carlo Hamalainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:41 AM, mabshoff
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > here we go with 2.11.rc0. Hopefully this will be identical
> > to the final 2.11 release. So please build, doctest and
I get this also, on a G4 mac running 10.4.11.
My "make test" got hung up in a strange way and my terminal seemed
corrupted, but I think that was because firefox crashed doing some
jmol stuff and its probably irrelevent. I reran the test where it
hung and it passed (sage/interfaces/expect.py)
-M
Hi,
rc0 -- On every single test machine
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/dsage/tests/testdoc.py
fails.
On Meccah (athlon 32-bit):
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/psage.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/mi
On an (old) ubuntu 7.10 amd64 machine, s.11.rc0 installed fine but
sage -testall has hung 3 times (as of now). I ctl-C'd and restarted.
It has hung on const.tex, calculus.py, and special.py.
Failures so far in testdoc.py and weierstrass_morphism.py:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/dsage/tests/te
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 5:44 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2:13 pm, "Carlo Hamalainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:41 AM, mabshoff
> >
>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > here we go with 2.11.rc0. Hopefully this will be identica
On Mar 30, 6:31 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> rc0 -- On every single test machine
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/dsage/tests/testdoc.py
> fails.
Yeah, but as Yi wrote below it is an exception thrown at exit. I don't
consider it a show stopper for 2.10.4.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:00 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 30, 6:31 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > rc0 -- On every single test machine
> >sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/dsage/tests/testdoc.py
> > fails.
>
> Yeah, but as Yi
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From sci.math.symbolic
>
> See also the follow up.
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: benchmarking CAS
> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 06:57:32 GMT
> From: Nasser Abbasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: N
I am the author of the program Frobby, which does computations on
monomial ideals. I think Sage is a great project, and I would like to
contribute by making it possible to use Frobby as a part of Sage. My
question is whether Frobby is an appropriate thing to add to Sage, and
if so how I might begi
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Bjake Hammersholt Roune
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am the author of the program Frobby, which does computations on
> monomial ideals. I think Sage is a great project, and I would like to
> contribute by making it possible to use Frobby as a part of Sage. M
I'm pleased to announce the availability of a working set of Debian
packages for SAGE 2.10.4. The dependencies of SAGE that are not already
in Debian have their own Debian packages that install into /usr, and the
SAGE package is uses these separately packaged dependencies (SAGE itself
lives i
Nice work Tim (and mabshoff)!
--Mike
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Timothy G Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm pleased to announce the availability of a working set of Debian
> packages for SAGE 2.10.4. The dependencies of SAGE that are not already
> in Debian have their own Debia
The set of Debian packages for SAGE 2.10.4 that I just announced do not
pass all doctests. Some known problems include:
- the scipy_sandbox is not installed (so delaunay.py won't load)
- jmol is not installed
- a few GAP packages are not available in Debian's GAP.
- PARI in Debian has the ma
On Mar 31, 2:20 am, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice work Tim (and mabshoff)!
Well, it was overwhelmingly Tim since I have been busy with other
ports. About 5 minutes before you posted this email I released 2.11.
Welcome to to the rat race :)
Cheers,
Michaeö
> --Mike
>
> On Su
In running doctests with my Debian installation of SAGE (where SAGE_ROOT
is set to /usr/lib/sagemath), it's been annoying that one needs to run the
tests as root so that SAGE can write to
- $SAGE_ROOT/tmp/test.log
- .doctest_filename.py in various directories of the SAGE install
- the directory
On Mar 31, 2:44 am, Timothy G Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Tim,
> In running doctests with my Debian installation of SAGE (where SAGE_ROOT
> is set to /usr/lib/sagemath), it's been annoying that one needs to run the
> tests as root so that SAGE can write to
>
> - $SAGE_ROOT/tmp/test.lo
I use Suse enterprise server 9 sp2-ia64, below is the 'uname -a' result.
Linux linux 2.6.5-7.191-sn2 #1 SMP Tue Jun 28 14:58:56 UTC 2005 ia64
ia64 ia64 GNU/Linux
compiler is gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)
The first error was encountered in periods.cc where an ambiguous call.
It is a pity that I cann
On Mar 31, 3:10 am, guez offtsing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use Suse enterprise server 9 sp2-ia64, below is the 'uname -a' result.
> Linux linux 2.6.5-7.191-sn2 #1 SMP Tue Jun 28 14:58:56 UTC 2005 ia64
> ia64 ia64 GNU/Linux
> compiler is gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)
> The first error was en
On Mar 31, 3:10 am, guez offtsing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /usr/include/g++/cmath:411: error: float std::log(float)
> periods.cc: In function `NTL::RR G(int, NTL::RR)':
> periods.cc:975: error: call of overloaded `log(int)' is ambiguous
> /usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h:110:
On 30 Mar., 19:15, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a few ideas. Hopefully someone who is more of an expert on
> commutative algebra computations will weigh in.
>
> The usual procedure is to
> (1) make an optional SAGE package (spkg file - see the programming
> manual, maybe use th
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Bjake Hammersholt Roune
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 30 Mar., 19:15, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just a few ideas. Hopefully someone who is more of an expert on
> > commutative algebra computations will weigh in.
> >
> > The usual proced
Hello folks,
Sage 2.11 has been released on March 30th, 2008. It is available at
http://sagemath.org/download.html
I will post binaries sometime this evening.
* About Sage (http://www.sagemath.org)
Sage is developed by volunteers and combines 71 open source packages.
It is available
30 matches
Mail list logo
