>
>
> Anyway, I'm not sure what to do about this. I don't even know what
> "complex infinity" means...
Sure you do (as someone working in modular forms)! Infinity is the
point at infinity of the projective line over the
complex numbers (which is a 2-sphere). z<-->1/z exchanges complex
infinity
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:44:27 -0700
"William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Nils Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I tried the first example below in sage. It failed , complaining that
> > maxima wanted to know whether x was positive, negative or
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> > Anyway, I'm not sure what to do about this. I don't even know what
> > "complex infinity" means...
>
> Sure you do (as someone working in modular forms)!
> Infinity is the
> point at infinity of the projectiv
I guess you are right. In modular forms one actually works with the
complex upper half plane
equipped with the action of a discrete group. If I am not mixing
things up (which is
quite likely as I am not an expert) you want a sort of minimal
compactification which is equivariant for the action
of t
Hi,
I am attempting to build Sage 2.10.4 om Mac OSX 10.3.9 (PPC), and have
run into an error building cremoz/eclib. The error output looks like:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DNEW_OP_ORDER -DUSE_PARI_FACTORING -I../include -
DNTL_ALL -I/Users/wendy/Transfer/sage-2.10.4/local/include -I/Users/
wendy/Transfer
On Mar 28, 11:28 am, DuaneKaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am attempting to build Sage 2.10.4 om Mac OSX 10.3.9 (PPC), and have
> run into an error building cremoz/eclib. The error output looks like:
> Any idea what to try next?
Hi Duane,
building Sage on OSX 10.3 is no longer
Thanks Martin,
I think the issue is that we want a version of our repository that has no
binary data in it for transparency. The virus part is just a possible
scenario that has been blown out of proportion because of the way I asked
the question, since I didn't understand it well enough myself :)
> As a compromise between you and Jason Grout I just went through the
> plot code
> and made sure all the print statements are replaced by calls to the
> verbose(...)
> function. This is a compromise because they're calls with the option
> level=0, so
> people will see them unless they type s
On Mar 27, 11:13 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's worth rethiking our _foo_init_ methods a little and allowing
> a tiny bit more than a single string that has to eval to the object.
> However, it's critical that we don't do something that is at all complicated
> or "ni
Something else to try (did in a notebook, not command line) is some variant
of
var('x')
p = plot(sin(x), 0, 0.01)
p.show(xmin = 0, xmax = 0.02, ymin = 0, ymax = 0.02)
Hopefully this helps with the xmin -- xmax problems at which I too have
sworn.
You may also change size of image with a modi
William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Jo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have tried to plot a graphic in the notebook with a small scale (<1)
>> and it end up by showing up nothing:
>>sage: var('x')
>>sage: plot(sin(x), 0, 0.01)
>>
>
> Try this:
>
> sage: plot(sin(x),
At risk of being irrelevant, one AlexGhitza took out another max/min ticket
at
< http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2607 > in response to an earlier
thread in sage-support, "Possible bug in Solve()," last March 18 -- 20.
*
So find_minimum_on_interval() returns a local minimum as opposed t
> Here's a nicely overengineered rough proposal.
I didn't comment before, but...
In my opinion this is not over-engineered. This is the canonical way
to do this sort of thing. whole-heartedly support this style and
wish it was in place in other areas, such as the production of latex
out
On Mar 5, 7:13 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a nicely overengineered rough proposal. The idea is to make it
> easy to write _sage_init_ methods, and get very nice output; without
> worrying much about how hard it is to write the framework. (I would
> probably write the frame
On Mar 27, 2008, at 3:47 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Although Justin's solution certainly works, one might consider adding
> a "real_part()" function to the quaternion class. But it would not do
> to call the function "real_part" since of course it depends on the
> ground field (which in the exa
Hi everybody,
Recently while working on the gfan interface I starting thinking about
adding some other polytope-related functionality to Sage, but I am not
sure how it should be organized. The classes I created in gfan
(probably to be sage-2.11) are somewhat ad-hoc.
In the near future I plan on
I thought it appropriate to put this one to vote. As someone has
pointed out( http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2684 ), red is
not an ideal color for vertices, since it is too dark. I propose we
change them to white.
Thoughts?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought it appropriate to put this one to vote. As someone has
> pointed out( http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2684 ), red is
> not an ideal color for vertices, since it is too dark. I propose we
> change
William Gates Hall (LAW) 119 has a ceiling mount projector, wifi, and 60 rolly
chairs.
http://www.css.washington.edu/room/434
Also, Parrington is really nice -- if you recall, that's the building we did
the VIGRE status report meetings. Same amenities as above.
http://www.css.washington.edu/ro
Hello folks,
this is 2.11.alpha2. It is a little later than I had hoped and
planned mostly due to the fact that Easter and Spring break
put somewhat of a damper on development. So far we merged 111
patches into this release.
There were fixes all over the map. This build should now also
build fin
Am I first to respond? w00t! But I have an unfair advantage this week,
being in an unusual time zone (India).
Anyway, on 64-bit RH (Opteron), I get one doctest failure (not in
parallel):
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/dsage/tests/testdoc.py
which fails as follows:
-
sage -t devel/sa
Hey Kiran,
Can you run
sage -t -verbose devel/sage-main/sage/dsage/tests/
and attach the output of that?
Thanks,
Yi
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Kiran Kedlaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am I first to respond? w00t! But I have an unfair advantage this week,
> being in an unusual time z
22 matches
Mail list logo
