On Mar 24, 3:18 am, Alex Ghitza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On a Dual Core machine running Gentoo, I've tried
>
> ./sage -tp 1 devel/sage/sage
>
> and
>
> ./sage -tp 2 devel/sage/sage
>
> Both appeared to run fine; the first used only one core
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Alex Ghitza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> Martin Albrecht brought up the following issue, in relation to
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2634
>
> "I am not convinced that it i
> I've been incredibly glad on numerous occasions that across the board
> Sage works very well with matrices that have 0 rows or columns, though
> this took a lot of extra work initially. The only argument put forth for
> removing multivariate polynomials rings with 0 generators is "It will
> be
For those in arithmetical algebraic geometry, the ratpoints
program might be of interest. It is GPL'd (GPLv3) and written in C.
Some documentation was just posted to the math arxivs:
Title: Documentation for the ratpoints program
Authors: Michael Stoll
Categories: math.NT
Comments: 14 pages
MSC-c
It would certainly be very useful to have this.
Note that an earlier version of ratpoints was wrapped by me into a C++
class which is in eclib. Changing that to use the new and
substantially revised version of ratpoints would be a good thing (for
me) to do, but highly nontrivial.
John
On 24 Ma
Ubuntu 7.10, amd64:
./sage -tp 1 devel/sage/sage
gave
The following tests failed:
sage -t 1/devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.py: 1 doctests failed
sage -t 1/devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py: 5 doctests failed
sage -t 1/devel/sage/sage/misc/preparser.py: 1 doctests failed
-
On Mar 24, 1:13 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ubuntu 7.10, amd64:
> ./sage -tp 1 devel/sage/sage
> gave
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t 1/devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.py: 1 doctests failed
Hi David,
> sage -t 1/devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py: 5
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:01 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It would certainly be very useful to have this.
>
> Note that an earlier version of ratpoints was wrapped by me into a C++
> class which is in eclib. Changing that to use the new and
> substantially revised version o
It is likely that Michael Stoll could be persuaded to change this.
John
On 24 Mar, 14:30, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:01 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It would certainly be very useful to have this.
>
> > Note that an earlier versi
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:50 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 24, 1:13 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ubuntu 7.10, amd64:
> > ./sage -tp 1 devel/sage/sage
> > gave
> > The following tests failed:
> >
> > sage -t 1/devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.p
Hi David,
> "Rerunning sage -t" yields all tests pass. I was reporting "sage -tp".
I know ;)
> Here is
> a copy+paste from the terminal history:
>
> sage -t 1/devel/sage/sage/misc/preparser.py
> **
> File "preparser.py", line
On Mar 23, 2008, at 12:11 PM, didier deshommes wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Jason Grout
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Jason Grout wrote:
>>> I'm in the process of overhauling the matrix() constructor. I ran
>>> across an (undocumented) behavior of the current matrix() functio
Could it be a Maxima pexpect issue?
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:38 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>
> > "Rerunning sage -t" yields all tests pass. I was reporting "sage -tp".
>
> I know ;)
>
>
>
> > Here is
> > a copy+paste from the terminal history:
> >
> > sage -
On Mar 24, 7:32 pm, "Bill Furnish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could it be a Maxima pexpect issue?
I doubt it since there was only one thread running. The interesting
question is whether it is reproducible.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
When applying the patch for a overhauled matrix() function at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2651, I get doctest failures
in crypto/mq/sr.py and sage/plot/plot3d/transform.pyx related to calling
matrix() with a list of rows, but specifying a number of rows that
conflicts.
You can
In http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2658, a situation is
brought up where the current behavior of matrix() is sort of awkward.
The issue is that if matrix(object) is called, the first thing that is
tried is object._matrix_(ZZ) and if that fails, then object._matrix_()
is tried. Is th
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:38 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>
> > "Rerunning sage -t" yields all tests pass. I was reporting "sage -tp".
>
> I know ;)
>
>
>
> > Here is
> > a copy+paste from the terminal history:
> >
> > sage -t 1/devel/sage/sage/misc/preparser.p
Hi Martin et al.,
Magma doesn't support rank zero polynomial rings and this is a real
pain when
we were trying to implement schemes. I could give you examples which
break
the schemes code, but I made no progress in convincing Allan Steel to
support
this boundary case. On the other hand if the
That one is a known issue.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:55 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:38 PM, mabshoff
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
>
> > Hi David,
> >
> >
> > > "Rerunning sage -t" yields all tests pass. I was reporting "sage -tp".
> >
>> I would prefer an error to be raised in all cases instead of silently
>> reshaping my data.
>>
>> didier
>>>
>
> I think an error should be raised in all cases as well.
+1.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups
(I'm taking this thread *off* the Cython lists and onto sage-devel
where it belongs.)
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Robert,
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> >
> > Some of us ran into MeatAxe before, but no one had any experienc
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2658, a situation is
> brought up where the current behavior of matrix() is sort of awkward.
> The issue is that if matrix(object) is called, the first thing that is
> tried
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> When applying the patch for a overhauled matrix() function at
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2651, I get doctest failures
> in crypto/mq/sr.py and sage/plot/plot3d/transform.pyx related to calling
> m
I thought this worth noting: Washington's 'Elliptic Curves' is out (in
the sense that you can order it, if not receive it). I got an ad for
it in the (snail) mail today, and the ad notes that one of the
features is:
- introduces three popular packages (Pari, Magma, and Sage) for
computi
On Mar 25, 5:37 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I'm taking this thread *off* the Cython lists and onto sage-devel
> where it belongs.)
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear Robert,
>
> > On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Robert Bradshaw wro
Hi,
I still did not look at the code of Meat axe, but I remember having been
really impressed a presentation at MSRI last year about MeatAxe.
The timings were really impressive especially the matmul ones.
So I am really surprised by your experience with slow matmul.
>>> The strength of MTX in
26 matches
Mail list logo
