Can you tell me where the license to fluid is located? I downloaded
from http://fluidapp.com/
the zip file. There is a subdirectory for licenses but the fluid
license isn't in it only
the (BSD-like) licenses for the components.
BTW, it appears to be Leopard only and the website says is similar to
Wow, I had no idea that was even a possibility:)
Thanks for pointing that out to me.
-Chris Gorecki
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more op
> Can you tell me where the license to fluid is located? I downloaded
> from http://fluidapp.com/ the zip file. There is a subdirectory for
> licenses but the fluid license isn't in it only the (BSD-like) licenses for
> the components.
Actually the README.txt is probably as close as you will get.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:59 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 7, 8:53 am, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does one just add a bunch of documentation and make a patch and submit
> > it? Or does one make a bunch of Trac tickets and make a ton of
> > patches?
Hi Sage-Devel:
The main goals for Sage-3.0 are:
* DOCTESTS: Raise the doctest coverage of the Sage library to 50%.
* INTERACT: Interactive versions of functions in the notebook; kind of
like Mathematica's Manipulate command.
* R: a pexpect R interface
* TIMING/BENCHMARK: M
Hi
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 08:29:33AM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel:
> The main goals for Sage-3.0 are:
> The target date is April 5, 2008.
Awesome, great work, good luck, and thanks to all the devs!
Jan
--
.~.
/V\ Jan Groenewald
/( )\www.aims.ac.za
^^-^^
--~-
See some screenshots:
http://picasaweb.google.com/j.spies88/ScreenshotsMlabMayavi210
For those in the *experimental vein* (linux only):
See:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/SPKGS/mayavi_2.1.0/
> Install or build sage-2.10.3 or one of the release candidates.
>
> Put all this files in
Here are slides from my first Sage talk. I told the audience why I am
excited about Sage.
http://www.lacim.uqam.ca/~saliola/maths/talks/slides/SageTalk1.pdf
I made the slides with beamer using the sagetex latex package. Here is
the tex file for the slides.
http://www.lacim.uqam.ca/~saliola/
There has been talk of things that need to be updated in the programming
guide. Here is a short list (also on trac at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2422 ). Is there anything
else? You might add your comments to the trac ticket.
The programming guide should be updated:
1. Instru
Nice. I really liked the LaTeX examples.
John
On 07/03/2008, Franco Saliola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here are slides from my first Sage talk. I told the audience why I am
> excited about Sage.
>
> http://www.lacim.uqam.ca/~saliola/maths/talks/slides/SageTalk1.pdf
>
> I made the slide
In reviewing #2340, which adds some nice documentation for
rings/ring.pyx -- done by cswiercz -- I came across for the first time
the feature that gcd(a,b) works for rational a,b, returning a
perfectly sensible answer.
sage: gcd(1/2,1/3)
1/6
Are there any other fields for which someone has imple
On Mar 7, 2008, at 09:10 , Franco Saliola wrote:
>
> Here are slides from my first Sage talk. I told the audience why I am
> excited about Sage.
>
> http://www.lacim.uqam.ca/~saliola/maths/talks/slides/SageTalk1.pdf
>
> I made the slides with beamer using the sagetex latex package. Here is
> t
This is at http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/2425 awaiting review.
Jason
John Cremona wrote:
> +1. For calculus, gradient is the good term. For a Jacobian
> function I would expect the input to be a list/sequence of functions
> and the output a matrix.
>
> John
>
> On 29/02/2008, didier de
I would like to implement some Bayesian routines using Cython. I have
looked at some of the Cython examples but they don't really provide
enough information for a newbie like me. As a starting point i'd like
to implement bootstrapping of OLS parameter standard errors. That
would give me an idea of
14 matches
Mail list logo
