[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!

2008-02-15 Thread mabshoff
Hello folks, > * unramified and eisenstein extensions We are having some problems with the build from vanilla sources build: [10:11] mabshoff: You there? [10:13] After building alpha0, I get the following: [10:13] : No module named padic_extension_generic_element [10:26] wstein-grant: You

[sage-devel] an amusing little function

2008-02-15 Thread David Joyner
Hi: The following function is useful for me and maybe for others. What is amusing is that I wrote it for vectors by it works equally well for matrices (and maybe other structures) unchanged. I'm happy to make a patch for it, if others are interested, but am not sure where it should go. Comments or

[sage-devel] Re: an amusing little function

2008-02-15 Thread Jason Grout
David Joyner wrote: > Hi: > The following function is useful for me and maybe for > others. What is amusing is that I wrote it for vectors > by it works equally well for matrices (and maybe > other structures) unchanged. > I'm happy to make a patch for it, if others are interested, > but am not su

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!

2008-02-15 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 15, 2:03 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > Hello folks, > > > * unramified and eisenstein extensions > > We are having some problems with the build from vanilla sources build: > > [10:11] mabshoff: You there? > [10:13] After building alpha0, I get the following: > [

[sage-devel] Re: an amusing little function

2008-02-15 Thread John Cremona
I think both/either of these are useful enough they should be included. In David's code I noticed that he had to shift from permutations starting at 1 to 0 and back, but Jason's code did not do this. What magic is that? Either way, this particular issue needs to be well documented... John On

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!

2008-02-15 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > > > On Feb 15, 2:03 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > dortmund.de> wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >>> * unramified and eisenstein extensions >> We are having some problems with the build from vanilla sources build: >> >> [10:11] mabshoff: You there? >> [10:13] After building alph

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!

2008-02-15 Thread David Roe
This is doctest where the result used to be Traceback (most recent call last): ... TypeError: cannot create a p-adic out of but after the p-adics patch it started working and returning p. I looked at it briefly and couldn't figure out why it was doing so. David On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:16 PM

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!

2008-02-15 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 15, 9:21 pm, "David Roe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi David, > This is doctest where the result used to be > Traceback (most recent call > last): > > ... > > TypeError: cannot create a p-adic out of sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_element.MPolynomial_polydict'> > > but after th

[sage-devel] Re: random seed framework (was: Re: problem with test framework)

2008-02-15 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Feb 14, 2008, at 8:44 PM, Carl Witty wrote: [...] > randstate_python() > Returns an instance of random.Random. The first time it is called > on a given instance of randgen, a new random.Random is created and > seeded from the gmp_randstate_t; this is saved, and subsequent > cal

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!

2008-02-15 Thread Craig Citro
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py > Actually, this one could be unexpected numerical noise from the code I added in with John Voight's code. Jaap, could you post this doctest failure, too? -cc --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To pos

[sage-devel] Re: an amusing little function

2008-02-15 Thread David Joyner
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:43 PM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think both/either of these are useful enough they should be > included. In David's code I noticed that he had to shift from > permutations starting at 1 to 0 and back, but Jason's code did not do > this. What mag

[sage-devel] Re: random seed framework (was: Re: problem with test framework)

2008-02-15 Thread Carl Witty
On Feb 15, 10:12 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 14, 2008, at 8:44 PM, Carl Witty wrote: > > [...] > > > > > randstate_python() > > Returns an instance of random.Random. The first time it is called > > on a given instance of randgen, a new random.Random is create

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!

2008-02-15 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > >> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial.pyx > > That is a new one. Could you post the detailed failure? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.10.2.alpha0]$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial.pyx sage -t devel/sage-m

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!

2008-02-15 Thread mabshoff
> > The patch at > > >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/1963/Sage-2.10.2... > > > fixes the import error. Hi Jaap > After applying the patch I got on Fedora 7 32 bits: > -- > The following tests failed: > >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!

2008-02-15 Thread mabshoff
If you want to commit to the devel/sage repo you need to drop in the files from http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/missing-debian.tar.gz into SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage. hg status should then show that everything is ok. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[sage-devel] Tickets with older patches/negative review/need for some attention

2008-02-15 Thread mabshoff
Hello folks, here is an incomplete list with tickets that need some attention. I got up to nearly 2100, so there are some tickets with patches not listed here, but they are fairly young. It is very likely that I should follow up to those in the next day or so, depending also on the feedback I get

[sage-devel] Re: an amusing little function

2008-02-15 Thread Jason Grout
David Joyner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:43 PM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think both/either of these are useful enough they should be >> included. In David's code I noticed that he had to shift from >> permutations starting at 1 to 0 and back, but Jason's code did no

[sage-devel] Re: an amusing little function

2008-02-15 Thread David Joyner
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > David Joyner wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:43 PM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I think both/either of these are useful enough they should be > >> included. In David's code I noticed that he

[sage-devel] Problem building 2.10.2.alpha0 when SAGE_ROOT is a symlink

2008-02-15 Thread Nick Alexander
The new dependency caching code breaks when SAGE_ROOT is a symlink. Easy fix: don't have SAGE_ROOT be a symlink. But symlink's are convenient... The issue is in module_path, which doesn't recognize that SAGE_ROOT and the absolute path of its input could not be text identical. It could