I just submitted trac #1233 which reports how the wrapping of mwrank
for elliptic curve rank calculations causes errors for non-minimal
curves.
The diagnosis is that even though mwrank is perfect ;) it would be
much easier to fix this from within mwrank than from within Sage, so I
assigned it t
John Cremona wrote:
Hello John,
> I just submitted trac #1233 which reports how the wrapping of mwrank
> for elliptic curve rank calculations causes errors for non-minimal
> curves.
>
> The diagnosis is that even though mwrank is perfect ;) it would be
> much easier to fix this from within mwra
Thanks! I added a comment to #1058 too (formatted properly this time)
and assigned it to me since it can be fixed at the same time. By me.
John
On 21/11/2007, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John Cremona wrote:
>
> Hello John,
>
> > I just submitted trac #1233 which reports how the wra
Hello,
this is the final rc for this release cycle. Unless something goes
horribly wrong expect a release in about 6 hours or so.
rc2->rc1
Tarball is at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.13.rc2.tar
[165MB]
doctest fixes:
- merged #1190, #1223, #1225, #1226, #1227, #1228,
Hi, I needed some calculation period benchmark for pairings. I could
not find anything build in, but the following implementation solved my
problem:
http://maths.straylight.co.uk/archives/104
Cheers, Steffen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email
On Nov 21, 2007 8:17 AM, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, I needed some calculation period benchmark for pairings. I could
> not find anything build in, but the following implementation solved my
> problem:
>
> http://maths.straylight.co.uk/archives/104
Thanks! I've made adding this to
Hi,
thanks for inviting me to become a member here!
David: I am working in Algebraic Geometry (algebraic cycles and K-
theory) mainly but teach almost entirely number theory and hence
essentially only give away thesis topics in number theory. By the way
I got into all this after writing
a
On Nov 20, 2007 1:40 PM, Paul Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>William,
>
> sage told me to report you, thus I do:
[... see below]
For the particular curve you're considering mwrank (via sage's rank command)
can compute the rank -- which is what you want -- in 0.5 seconds, so maybe
On Nov 19, 2007 11:49 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 6:12 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just did a test and using the new version of g95 here:
> >
> >http://ftp.g95.org/g95-x86-osx.tgz
> >
> > works fine for building Sage on Leopard OS X
On Nov 21, 2007 8:11 AM, sms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for inviting me to become a member here!
Welcome to sage-devel!
>
> David: I am working in Algebraic Geometry (algebraic cycles and K-
> theory) mainly but teach almost entirely number theory and hence
> essentially only give
On Nov 21, 6:27 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 11:49 PM, mabshoff
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 20, 6:12 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
>
> > > I just did a test and using the new version of g95 here:
>
> > >http://f
Hi Sage Devel,
If you noticed the publicity a few months ago about E8, "the Sage
supercomputer", etc.,
then you might be interested in this project.The software here,
which is a mostly
well documented (but sometimes not) not unpleasant C++ program
http://www.liegroups.org/software/downl
On Nov 21, 2007, at 8:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 8:17 AM, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I needed some calculation period benchmark for pairings. I could
>> not find anything build in, but the following implementation
>> solved my
>> problem:
>>
>> http://maths.
I have a project that I have meant to tackle myself, but I doubt I
will have time to do it for at least a year, so someone can beat me to
it (just let me know!):
Write a parallellized (DSage!) algorithm/implementation to compute
convex hulls of rational points in n-dimensional space, using exact
On Nov 21, 2007 11:16 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a project that I have meant to tackle myself, but I doubt I
> will have time to do it for at least a year, so someone can beat me to
> it (just let me know!):
>
> Write a parallellized (DSage!) algorithm/implementation to com
I think this is interesting but I wonder how easy it is to compile.
Also, is there also a plan to include lie?
++
On 11/21/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Sage Devel,
>
> If you noticed the publicity a few months ago about E8, "the Sage
> supercom
On Nov 21, 8:50 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello David,
> I think this is interesting but I wonder how easy it is to compile.
It compiles on OSX, Linux, Solaris and Windows (probably Cygwin), the
sources are at their website.
> Also, is there also a plan to include lie?
M
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007, at 8:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
> > On Nov 21, 2007 8:17 AM, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi, I needed some calculation period benchmark for pairings. I could
> >> not find anything build in, but the following implemen
Hello folks,
2.8.13 is about to be released, but I would like to make a couple
remarks of things I think we can do to have a better release next
time:
* Mandatory patch review is good, but instead of waiting for the
actual merge cycle it would be better if the autor[s] of a patch/
patches would
On Nov 21, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Nov 21, 2007, at 8:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Nov 21, 2007 8:17 AM, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I needed some calculation period benchmark for pairings. I
>>
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is the final rc for this release cycle. Unless something goes
> horribly wrong expect a release in about 6 hours or so.
>
> rc2->rc1
>
Hi Michael,
I don't think this is a blocker!
Jaap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.8.13.rc2]$ ./sage -t
devel/sage-main/sage/i
It's fixed (patch posted to trac). As suspected, it was a bug introduced in
the ell_rational_field refactoring.
David
On Nov 21, 2007 12:25 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2007 1:40 PM, Paul Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >William,
> >
> > sage told
William suggested that I wrote a paragraph or two describing what
would be involved for the S-integral points implementation. I have
not done so yet, but this email might contain enough to get someone
started, I spent some time yesterday looking up the literature on
this, and there is quite a lo
Hello folks,
Sage 2.8.13 has been released. Sources are and binaries should soon be
available at
http://sagemath.org/download.html
This is the first release after the excellent Sage Days 6 in Bristol.
We are a couple days late, mostly due to a rocky initial alpha0 that
took some t
Polymake fails to meet my needs because I am interested in really
large, high-dimensional polytopes, and doing anything in exact
arithmetic with them is challenging. Fukuda's cdd is the best serial
program at computing degenerate high-dimensional convex hulls exactly,
but it gets overwhelmed by s
On Nov 21, 10:56 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> > this is the final rc for this release cycle. Unless something goes
> > horribly wrong expect a release in about 6 hours or so.
>
> > rc2->rc1
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I don't think this is a blocker!
>
> Jaa
On Nov 22, 12:46 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Sage 2.8.13 has been released. Sources are and binaries should soon be
> available at
>
> http://sagemath.org/download.html
>
> This is the first release after the excellent Sage Days 6 in Bristol.
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
