I want to add that however random's are changed, e.g., for the integers,
the current behavior MUST still be available. The reason is because most
benchmarks I know about for other systems use uniformly chosen random
numbers in an interval. Loosing this behavior would make it much much
more painf
Of course. I agree that there should be an algorithm parameter, but I
bet most people/functions will end up using the default which should
be something reasonable.
On Mar 3, 2007, at 8:25 AM, William Stein wrote:
> I want to add that however random's are changed, e.g., for the
> integers,
Hi,
According to
http://code.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=60302&topic=10727
mentoring organizations can apply to mentor Google Summer of Code
projects between March 5 and March 12.
I think the chances Google will declare SAGE / Univ of Washington as a
mentoring organization are s
Hi,
I was playing a little with sage, and I've found that there are some
problems with the interface with gp when dealing with big numbers, due
to
the the fact that sage doesn not understand the gp exponential
notation.
One first example, is the following:
a= factorial(100,'pari'); a
works as
On Saturday 03 March 2007 9:40 pm, pdenapo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was playing a little with sage, and I've found that there are some
> problems with the interface with gp when dealing with big numbers, due
> to
> the the fact that sage doesn not understand the gp exponential
> notation.
>
> One first
