Re: [sage-devel] optional doctests

2012-10-15 Thread John Cremona
> How about that... > >> ("Fails" in the sense that something >> does work whil the doctest is written with the assumtption that it >> will not). Is it possible that you can change that example to an >> equivalent one with a curve of conductor much greater then 30? PS: http://www.lmfdb.org/E

Re: [sage-devel] optional doctests

2012-10-15 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:23 AM, John Cremona wrote: > On 15 October 2012 17:15, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:22 AM, John Cremona wrote: >>> 1. In the Developers' Guide >>> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/conventions.html regarding >>> optional doctests it says >>

Re: [sage-devel] optional doctests

2012-10-15 Thread John Cremona
On 15 October 2012 17:15, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:22 AM, John Cremona wrote: >> 1. In the Developers' Guide >> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/conventions.html regarding >> optional doctests it says >> >> "Mark a doctest as optional if it requires optional package

Re: [sage-devel] optional doctests

2012-10-15 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:22 AM, John Cremona wrote: > 1. In the Developers' Guide > http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/conventions.html regarding > optional doctests it says > > "Mark a doctest as optional if it requires optional packages; even > better, mark it as optional - PKG_NAME if it re