Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Follow NEP 29: Recommended Python version

2024-06-05 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Actually, it doesn't seem that the votes have ever been counted here. In view of SymPy willing to follow NEP 29 (cf. https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/0BPkiiWYrIU/m/c1vlJoMGEwAJ), it seems natural to join this trend and follow NEP 29. On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 10:35:21 AM UTC+1 G. M.-S

Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Follow NEP 29: Recommended Python version

2023-05-30 Thread G. M.-S.
My vote is empty, for the following reasons: —I think the question asked is not clear enough, as per reactions. —My "dream" is having an easy to install recent version of SageMath for everybody wishing to do mathematics with it. Currently this is only the case for macOS and perhaps some flavours o

Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Follow NEP 29: Recommended Python version

2023-05-26 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I am for adapting NEP 29 for Sage (and thus dropping Python 3.8 now). Few comments on the Summary: 2) it's very important to be in sync with various Sage's upstream parts, as much as possible. We don't want to lag behind, preventing us from being able to use latest versions. 3) Saying that Pytho