On Friday, January 25, 2013 10:49:21 AM UTC-5, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2013-01-25 16:38, kcrisman wrote:
> > Yes with SAGE_CHECK=yes
> I actually don't think the value of SAGE_CHECK matters, as the failure
> is in a quick test which is done anyway (even with SAGE_CHECK off).
>
That was
On 2013-01-25 16:38, kcrisman wrote:
> Yes with SAGE_CHECK=yes
I actually don't think the value of SAGE_CHECK matters, as the failure
is in a quick test which is done anyway (even with SAGE_CHECK off).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" grou
On Friday, January 25, 2013 6:32:35 AM UTC-5, David Joyner wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Jeroen Demeyer
> >
> wrote:
> > On 2013-01-25 12:21, David Joyner wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Jeroen Demeyer
> >> >
> wrote:
> >>> On 2013-01-25 12:02, David Joyner wrote
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2013-01-25 12:21, David Joyner wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Jeroen Demeyer
>> wrote:
>>> On 2013-01-25 12:02, David Joyner wrote:
Does that mean something is still wrong?
>>> Yes, this bug hasn't been fixed. The bug
On 2013-01-25 12:21, David Joyner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Jeroen Demeyer
> wrote:
>> On 2013-01-25 12:02, David Joyner wrote:
>>> Does that mean something is still wrong?
>> Yes, this bug hasn't been fixed. The bug is non-deterministic, try
>> building again. But it seems that
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2013-01-25 12:02, David Joyner wrote:
>> Does that mean something is still wrong?
> Yes, this bug hasn't been fixed. The bug is non-deterministic, try
> building again. But it seems that the new MPIR somehow made this bug
> more likely
On 2013-01-25 12:02, David Joyner wrote:
> Does that mean something is still wrong?
Yes, this bug hasn't been fixed. The bug is non-deterministic, try
building again. But it seems that the new MPIR somehow made this bug
more likely to appear.
--
You received this message because you are subscri
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Could someone try to build the new MPIR from
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13137 and build zn_poly on top of
> it (especially the make check target).
It is included in 5.7.b0 and I can't get sage to built on l