Hi all,
I tried "sage -ba" and the build now completes. Sage now starts without
errors! So it looks to me like the patch to module_list.py is needed for
openSUSE 11.2. Thanks, all.
I also ran:
./sage -docbuild all html 2>&1 | tee -a dochtml.log
It also looks like that works fine now, too.
I a
Thanks Nathan, Mike,
I applied
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/8844/trac_8844-
module_list.patch to $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-main/module_list.py.
What do I now need to do to re-build sage without starting from scratch?
"sage -b" and "sage -f sage" seem to "work", but they don't f
Hi all,
OK. I have now run make again, this time with
unset SAGE_CHECK
unset SAGE64
The build apparently completes, but dochtml.log still has much the same error
messages:
---
sphinx-build -b html -d
/home/leopardi/src/Sage/sage-4.4.1/devel/sage/doc/output/doctrees/en/numerical_s
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Paul Leopardi
wrote:
> Hi all,
> make clean
> make
>
> does not work the way I expected it to. I expected it to clean out my existing
> build of sage and start again. Instead, "make clean" outputs:
Use "make distclean".
William
>
> echo "Deleted spkg/build"
> D
Hi all,
make clean
make
does not work the way I expected it to. I expected it to clean out my existing
build of sage and start again. Instead, "make clean" outputs:
echo "Deleted spkg/build"
Deleted spkg/build
rm -rf spkg/build
mkdir -p spkg/build
echo "Deleted spkg/archive"
Deleted spkg/archive
Thanks, Jaap,
> From: Jaap Spies
> Mon, 17 May 2010 18:30:23 +0200
>
> Paul Leopardi wrote:
> > Thanks, Georg,
> > I moved -lm to just before -o test in the makefile for symmetrica-2.0.p5,
used
> > tar zcf to creat a replacement spkg, and the make now continues past
> > symmetrica-2.0.p5. The ma
Hi all,
The build on my machine apparently finished. The end of install.log looks
like:
--
[...]
Successfully installed sagetex-2.2.5
Running the test suite.
pdfTeX using libpoppler 3.1415926-1.40.9-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.7)
kpathsea vers
In the makefile for symmetrica, the -lm has to go after all the .o files that
need libm.a or libm.so. This is standard practice for GNU binutils and not a
quirk of OpenSUSE, so I don't see why the build should have worked with any
other Linux distribution (remember that I have exported
SAGE_CHE
Thanks, Georg,
I moved -lm to just before -o test in the makefile for symmetrica-2.0.p5, used
tar zcf to creat a replacement spkg, and the make now continues past
symmetrica-2.0.p5. The make is still running.
I have the following environment variables defined:
SAGE64=yes
SAGE_CHECK=yes
SAGE_ROO
Thanks for the help. I tried again but with
export SAGE64=yes
before running make.
The only difference is that the calls to gcc now include the option -m64.
The warning and error messages are the same.
Best, Paul
--- install.2.log 2010-05-16 15:38:19.0 +1000
+++ install.log 2010-05-
On 05/16/10 07:01 AM, Paul Leopardi wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to build Sage 4.4.1 from sourece, using gcc 4.4.1 on SUSE 11.2.
So far I have had two failures. I can work around the first, but have no clue
about the second.
Best, Paul
1. Problem with libreadline
Symptom:
[...]/local/lib/libreadli
11 matches
Mail list logo
