Re: [sage-devel] Re: webgl

2012-01-31 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/30/12 5:11 PM, Jason Grout wrote: >> >> On 1/29/12 1:49 PM, Keshav Kini wrote: >>> >>> Well, I wonder if we shouldn't ask around a bit more. If a day later you >>> found something better than pre3d, maybe soon you will find something >>> e

Re: [sage-devel] Re: webgl

2012-01-29 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, 30 January 2012 03:49:45 UTC+8, Keshav Kini wrote: > > Well, I wonder if we shouldn't ask around a bit more. If a day later you > found something better than pre3d, maybe soon you will find something even > better than three.js? :P As to who would be a good community to ask about >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: webgl

2012-01-29 Thread Keshav Kini
Well, I wonder if we shouldn't ask around a bit more. If a day later you found something better than pre3d, maybe soon you will find something even better than three.js? :P As to who would be a good community to ask about this stuff, though, I have no idea. -Keshav Join us in #sagemath on

Re: [sage-devel] Re: webgl

2012-01-28 Thread Volker Braun
Even better, three.js can render canvas, svg, and WebGL.. Maybe that is what "three" refers to? ;-) Once we can render svg, it would be easy to convert that to pdf for publications. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an em

Re: [sage-devel] Re: webgl

2012-01-28 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:25 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:10 AM, mmarco wrote: >> I have just tested on chromium and firefor under linux. It does work >> on both (but i have the impression that performance is better in >> chromium). Strangely, it does work on the version o

Re: [sage-devel] Re: webgl

2012-01-27 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:10 AM, mmarco wrote: > I have just tested on chromium and firefor under linux. It does work > on both (but i have the impression that performance is better in > chromium). Strangely, it does work on the version of firefox that i > have compiled in my computer, but it does

Re: [sage-devel] Re: webgl

2012-01-26 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > On Thursday, January 26, 2012 2:14:36 PM UTC-8, William wrote: >> >> [1] If you're using Chrome, check out >> http://www.chromeexperiments.com/webgl > > > Unless you use Linux, where chrome doesn't support webgl despite what the > documentatio