On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>> NetworkX is a standard package in Sage, so everything in NetworkX is in Sage.
>
> Sigh
Moreover, what matters to me is the open source ecosystem, not just Sage.
My goal is (as it has been for a decade) to make the open source
ecosyst
> NetworkX is a standard package in Sage, so everything in NetworkX is in Sage.
Sigh
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsu
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>> combinatorial geometry. Unfortunately I don't know enough about graph theory
>> to say how Sage compares with any other CAS, but I would think we compare
>> quite well. Nathann?
>
> I've got no idea. I never used the graph theory library of
On Monday, February 15, 2016 at 1:43:02 AM UTC-6, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> On Monday, February 15, 2016 at 1:11:18 AM UTC+1, William wrote:
>>
>> Combinatorics is definitely the strongest part of Sage.
>
>
> Old school combinatorics perhaps. But see
> http://unsexy-science.blogspot.de/2015/10/survey
Yo,
> combinatorial geometry. Unfortunately I don't know enough about graph theory
> to say how Sage compares with any other CAS, but I would think we compare
> quite well. Nathann?
I've got no idea. I never used the graph theory library of any other
CAS, and the independent graph libraries I met
>
> Combinatorics is definitely the strongest part of Sage.
>
>
> Old school combinatorics perhaps. But see
> http://unsexy-science.blogspot.de/2015/10/survey-sage-and-enumerative.html
>
We also have strong support for algebraic combinatorics with symmetric
functions and its well-known/studied g
Le 15/02/2016 08:27, Daniel Krenn a écrit :
> On 2016-02-15 06:25, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, William Stein wrote:
>> Shall we teach Python in the process of teaching Sage?
>
> At least, I do in my first year's course.
>
> D
>
And one argument for teaching Sage at undergraduat
On Monday, February 15, 2016 at 1:11:18 AM UTC+1, William wrote:
>
> Combinatorics is definitely the strongest part of Sage.
Old school combinatorics perhaps. But see
http://unsexy-science.blogspot.de/2015/10/survey-sage-and-enumerative.html
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
On 2016-02-15 06:25, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, William Stein wrote:
> Shall we teach Python in the process of teaching Sage?
At least, I do in my first year's course.
D
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubs
On 2016-02-15 07:56, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> -> We write to the guys who complain about the software and ask
> them to give us more concrete examples, so that we learn and fix them.
> The first one, the guy who mentions bad doc and useless functions
> surely has some stories to tell..
>
> If som
> There's a big reddit discussion in which a lot of people say
> not-so-nice things about Sage:
>
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/45q7j1/sagemath_open_source_is_now_ready_to_compete_with/
What do you think about doing something smart?
-> We write to the guys who complain about t
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, William Stein wrote:
There's a big reddit discussion in which a lot of people say
not-so-nice things about Sage:
https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/45q7j1/sagemath_open_source_is_now_ready_to_compete_with/
Shall we teach Python in the process of teaching Sage?
It sh
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 5:32:34 PM UTC-6, William wrote:
>>
>> There's a big reddit discussion in which a lot of people say
>> not-so-nice things about Sage:
>>
>>
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/45q7j1/sagemath_open
13 matches
Mail list logo
