On Dec 9, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Pablo De Napoli wrote:
> Many thanks to everybody for your help.
>
> some questions/remarks:
>
> 1) ¿Does every function needs to have two versions: a symbolic one and
> a numerical one?
Somewhat. The situation arises because one often only defines the
function numer
Many thanks to everybody for your help.
some questions/remarks:
1) ¿Does every function needs to have two versions: a symbolic one and
a numerical
one?
2) the current implementation treats f(x)=sin(x) as a symbolic expression
sage: f(x)=sin(x)
sage: f
x |--> sin(x)
sage: type(f)
However, math
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Would it be possible, using this, to define a symbolic Sum ? Something
> like Sum(Set([1,2,3,4,5,6]))...This would be extremely useful in
What would the output of that be?
There is http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3587 , but I don't
