On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Tom Boothby wrote:
> +1 to using Graph6 strings, and I'll review this tomorrow.
OK, the doctest is in the patch, and all ready for review.
--
Robert L. Miller
http://www.rlmiller.org/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To u
+1 to using Graph6 strings, and I'll review this tomorrow.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Robert Miller wrote:
> Fixed!
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9045
>
> Note that the patch does not yet have any doctests. I'm waiting on a
> better description of the graphs which caused the
Fixed!
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9045
Note that the patch does not yet have any doctests. I'm waiting on a
better description of the graphs which caused the bug in the first
place. (Although we could use the graph6 strings for now, since having
this merged is probably pretty impor
