On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Tim Abbott wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, wrote:
>> > I think there are a couple new dependencies that are not in Debian; there
>> > weren't any as of version 4.0 or so. I would recommend first getting
>>
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, wrote:
> > I think there are a couple new dependencies that are not in Debian; there
> > weren't any as of version 4.0 or so. I would recommend first getting
> > sagemath working building the copies contained in the sag
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>
>> > Kamaraju,
>> >
>> > Overall I like your plan. And I'd like to help.
>> >
>> > I do not like starting with version 3.0.6. I think such an old version
>> > is unlikely to attract many users and hence t
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:00:19 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi
wrote:
> Users do not want to install the latest version without knowing if
> their problem is fixed in the latest version. But if they know that
> the problem is fixed, then they make every effort to get that version.
This is reasonably eas
On 08/ 6/10 11:00 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
My understanding is that upstream is very unhappy with the fact that
Debian is shipping an old version, as it generates support requests for
something that they don't want to support (3.0.5 was released on
2008-07-11).
If anyone has the time, I
