Re: [sage-devel] Re: hosting wiki and trac

2016-06-07 Thread Erik Bray
On Jun 7, 2016 19:36, "kcrisman" wrote: > > > >> >> >> +1 to hosting at at Tier 1 cloud provider >> >> > > > Just as a point of information, are there any other "Tier 1 cloud providers" who might be alternatives (usable for Sage development) for anyone who has some philosophical objection to one p

Re: [sage-devel] Re: hosting wiki and trac

2016-06-07 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:36:26 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: > > > > >> >> +1 to hosting at at Tier 1 cloud provider >> >> >> > > Just as a point of information, are there any other "Tier 1 cloud > providers" who might be alternatives (usable for Sage development) for > anyone who has some

Re: [sage-devel] Re: hosting wiki and trac

2016-06-07 Thread kcrisman
> >> +1 to hosting at at Tier 1 cloud provider > >> > Just as a point of information, are there any other "Tier 1 cloud providers" who might be alternatives (usable for Sage development) for anyone who has some philosophical objection to one particular such provider? Also, not to beat a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: hosting wiki and trac

2016-06-07 Thread Erik Bray
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:54 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Volker Braun wrote: >> +1 to hosting at at Tier 1 cloud provider >> >> Also, if you have any arguments pro or con then send it to the mailinglist >> and not to William's private email. > > +1 -- SageMath should

Re: [sage-devel] Re: hosting wiki and trac

2016-06-07 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > +1 to hosting at at Tier 1 cloud provider > > Also, if you have any arguments pro or con then send it to the mailinglist > and not to William's private email. +1 -- SageMath should be as open a project as possible. See, e.g., "Avoid Private D