The ticket #13726 on semimonomial transformation group is merged into
sage-5.13.beta.
Now, the last step would be to find a reviewer for #13771...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
Am Samstag, 5. Oktober 2013 15:50:46 UTC+2 schrieb Volker Braun:
>
> On Saturday, October 5, 2013 2:03:57 PM UTC+1, David Joyner wrote:
>>
>> My vote would be to certainly allow it to be an experimental package.
>>
>
> There isn't really too much need for additional work here, what I'm seeing
>
On Saturday, October 5, 2013 2:03:57 PM UTC+1, David Joyner wrote:
>
> My vote would be to certainly allow it to be an experimental package.
>
There isn't really too much need for additional work here, what I'm seeing
in the current patch is mostly adequate. A bit more documentation of
input/ou
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Thomas Feulner
wrote:
> Thanks for all your help.
>
> @Volker: You are right, the names are terrible. I will change them. There is
> no need to have LinearCode_AutGroupCanLabel in the global namespace. I think
> LinearCode should have a member of this type, but I wa
Thomas:
What is your goal here? To have codecan included standard in Sage or
as an optional package or as an experimental package? I ask because
it seems you have installed everything in local/lib/python2.7/site-packages.
Unless I am mistaken (and I easily could be) that is an unusual location
for
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Thomas Feulner
wrote:
> The last post to this thread is 2 years old, but I have continued my work on
> canonical forms for linear codes.
>
> I have followed up Dima`s proposal and prepared a package, which is entirely
> written in Python/Cython, since there is no on
