Hi,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:13:28AM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:09 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> > I thought of one more issue here. Has the new branch of sagenb where the
> > "report a bug" link goes to ask.sagemath instead of the Google doc gone live
> > yet? That woul
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:09 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> I thought of one more issue here. Has the new branch of sagenb where the
> "report a bug" link goes to ask.sagemath instead of the Google doc gone live
> yet? That would be unfortunate at this time.
If somebody with server admin skills (especi
On 2014-02-21 19:09, kcrisman wrote:
I thought of one more issue here. Has the new branch of sagenb where
the "report a bug" link goes to ask.sagemath instead of the Google doc
gone live yet?
Yes, it's like that in Sage 6.1.1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
I thought of one more issue here. Has the new branch of sagenb where the
"report a bug" link goes to ask.sagemath instead of the Google doc gone
live yet? That would be unfortunate at this time.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:03 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> Looks like William just redirected ask.sagemath to his own homepage for now.
I have disabled http://ask.sagemath.org until somebody fixes the
backend spam-related problems. Hosting spam = quick way to have all
my network access at University of
On Friday, February 21, 2014 9:50:18 AM UTC-5, kcrisman wrote:
> Does someone have access to the actual database? I suppose it could be
done at that really low level too.
That's what I had in mind (not that I would know how to do it myself).
After that I think the natural step is to upgrade
Looks like William just redirected ask.sagemath to his own homepage for
now. I had almost finished deleting all the spam, too ;-) Good thing I
was giving an exam!
On Friday, February 21, 2014 9:50:18 AM UTC-5, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 21, 2014 9:40:56 AM UTC-5, kcrisman wrot
On Friday, February 21, 2014 9:40:56 AM UTC-5, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 21, 2014 9:11:33 AM UTC-5, Niles Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Now that I've spent a little time thinking about this, here are some
>> comments:
>>
>> * I misread our version of askbot -- it's over 2 years old
>>
>
On Friday, February 21, 2014 9:11:33 AM UTC-5, Niles Johnson wrote:
>
> Now that I've spent a little time thinking about this, here are some
> comments:
>
> * I misread our version of askbot -- it's over 2 years old
>
>
True.
> * recent versions of askbot (6 months ago or so) can put a captc
Now that I've spent a little time thinking about this, here are some
comments:
* I misread our version of askbot -- it's over 2 years old
* recent versions of askbot (6 months ago or so) can put a captcha on
users' first posts
* some of the spam is posted as "Anonymous" -- but that still requi
On Friday, February 21, 2014 7:52:45 AM UTC-5, Niles Johnson wrote:
>
> hmmm; we need a bigger hammer here. There was no more spam coming in when
> I left the office last night, but now at least the first 7 pages are full
> of spam from several different users. I can't delete that many by han
hmmm; we need a bigger hammer here. There was no more spam coming in when
I left the office last night, but now at least the first 7 pages are full
of spam from several different users. I can't delete that many by hand.
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:16:46 PM UTC-5, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
>
On 02/20/2014 12:14 PM, Niles Johnson wrote:
>
> There are a number of ideas on the askbot support site
>
> http://askbot.org/en/question/7893/suggestions-for-antispam-measures/
>
> but I don't know which of them are available in our version of askbot
> (roughly 1 year old).
>
I have a bit of
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:48:53 AM UTC-5, William wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I found that I'm an admin (which makes sense) -- I've changed kcrisman
> and niles to be admins. You can make other people admins as you see
> fit under "Moderation" --> "Change status to:".
>
>
Thanks, awesome.
-
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 12:14:45 PM UTC-5, Niles Johnson wrote:
>
> Blocking and deleting posts helped a lot. But now this particular spammer
> seems to be waiting a little while and then creating a new user to add more
> spam (I've blocked and deleted the same spam from 4 or 5 separate
Blocking and deleting posts helped a lot. But now this particular spammer
seems to be waiting a little while and then creating a new user to add more
spam (I've blocked and deleted the same spam from 4 or 5 separate users
now). I don't know how to deal with that.
There are a number of ideas o
Thanks -- deleting spam now . . .
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:48:53 AM UTC-5, William wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I found that I'm an admin (which makes sense) -- I've changed kcrisman
> and niles to be admins. You can make other people admins as you see
> fit under "Moderation" --> "Change statu
Hi,
I found that I'm an admin (which makes sense) -- I've changed kcrisman
and niles to be admins. You can make other people admins as you see
fit under "Moderation" --> "Change status to:".
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Niles Johnson wrote:
> I was just going to ask the same question. Karl
18 matches
Mail list logo
