On 11/ 8/10 06:16 AM, Tom Boothby wrote:
Ah hah, I see the problem. I was recalling this page:
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/WhyYouDoNotUsuallyNeedToKnowAboutInternals.html
which is what I thought the link originating this tread had replaced.
Thanks for being civil about p
Ah hah, I see the problem. I was recalling this page:
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/WhyYouDoNotUsuallyNeedToKnowAboutInternals.html
which is what I thought the link originating this tread had replaced.
Thanks for being civil about pointing out my error, Mark.
On Sun, Nov 7,
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:27 PM, mark mcclure wrote:
> On Nov 7, 7:22 pm, Tom Boothby wrote:
>> Hey, that's pretty neat! I wonder if this is a direct response to our
>> public criticism of their (extreme lack of) openness?
>> ...
>> > Mark Sofroniou (one of the numerical algorithm developers at W
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:44 PM, rjf wrote:
> On Nov 7, 4:22 pm, Tom Boothby wrote:
>> Hey, that's pretty neat! I wonder if this is a direct response to our
>> public criticism of their (extreme lack of) openness?
>>
>
> What are you smoking?
Nothing, and I'm completely serious. At the 2008 Joi
On 6 November 2010 20:39, rjf wrote:
> on that page has a link from the command documentation to that page.
> A regular user of Mathematica with some curiosity about algorithms
> will
> have been referred to that page many times by following links from
> help.
>
> The documentation on that page g