On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
>> No, absolutely not. That is as wrong a perspective as possible, so if
>> you still think that then somebody needs to make a screencast.
>
> Well, since you said it was "definitely not in any way, shape, or
> form, what [you] had in mind", I
> No, absolutely not. That is as wrong a perspective as possible, so if
> you still think that then somebody needs to make a screencast.
Well, since you said it was "definitely not in any way, shape, or
form, what [you] had in mind", I certainly don't *still* think that,
it's just the wrong preco
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 00:42, William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
>>> Can we adapt the IPython Qt app? Or did you want something more than that?
>>> From what I've heard, the IPython Qt app would work
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 00:42, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
>> Can we adapt the IPython Qt app? Or did you want something more than that?
>> From what I've heard, the IPython Qt app would work well in this scenario
>> since it can connect over zeromq
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Can we adapt the IPython Qt app? Or did you want something more than that?
> From what I've heard, the IPython Qt app would work well in this scenario
> since it can connect over zeromq to the backend inside the virtual machine
> while itself r
Can we adapt the IPython Qt app? Or did you want something more than that?
>From what I've heard, the IPython Qt app would work well in this scenario
since it can connect over zeromq to the backend inside the virtual machine
while itself running natively on Windows.
-Keshav
Join us in #sa
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 10:51:15 AM UTC-5, William wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure what you guys means by "headless". I would definitely not
>> call Volker's current VM headless, since when you start it up there is a
>> visible Linux console (
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 10:51:15 AM UTC-5, William wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what you guys means by "headless". I would definitely not
> call Volker's current VM headless, since when you start it up there is a
> visible Linux console (which I would call a "head"), and if you click in
> it, t
On Jan 10, 2012 6:37 AM, "Volker Braun" wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 8:22:51 AM UTC-5, mmarco wrote:
>>
>> Oh, and by the way: what about the option of running the VM in
>> headless mode?
>
>
> Again, that is what my current virtual machine does. It works fine as
long as the host has ne
