On Saturday, 23 January 2016 17:22:23 UTC, David Loeffler wrote:
>
> (The joke doesn't actually work in British English, because we'd always
> say "X is really lazy" rather than "X is real lazy".)
>
no, no, the joke is about real vs complex...
> David
>
> On 23 January 2016 at 17:03, Dima Pas
(The joke doesn't actually work in British English, because we'd always say
"X is really lazy" rather than "X is real lazy".)
David
On 23 January 2016 at 17:03, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, 23 January 2016 14:47:26 UTC, David Loeffler wrote:
>>
>> I have also raised some objections
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 14:47:26 UTC, David Loeffler wrote:
>
> I have also raised some objections on the ticket, which relate less to the
> content of the ticket than to the tone of the discussion (both on the
> ticket and on this thread). It is one thing to propose a change to a file
>
I have also raised some objections on the ticket, which relate less to the
content of the ticket than to the tone of the discussion (both on the
ticket and on this thread). It is one thing to propose a change to a file
name; it is another thing to mock a fellow Sage contributor or to accuse
the
I raised some objections on the ticket.
David
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Nathann Cohen
wrote:
> The 'constructor' file is being renamed to 'finite_field_constructor'
> in the following ticket:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19941
>
> Nathann
>
> On 22 January 2016 at 12:13, Nathan
